|
Bailout for the People! A Bailout for You!
The Great Depression of the 21st
Century: Collapse of the Real Economy
Why Taxes Are Not Necessary
Behind the Stock Market Illusion is Government
Collusion
Income Taxes are Cartoon Images of the Law
Hidden Truth about Income Taxes
IRS Deceives in the Use of Their Code Words
Income, Person, Shall, and Must
IRS Demands You Waive Your Fifth Amendment Right
IRS Fraudulently Recording a Notice of Lien as a
Lien
Businesses NOT Required to Be Withholding Agents
Agent Reveals IRS is a Fraud
Four-month Federal Income Tax Evasion Case Ends
with No convictions
Stopping an IRS Audit with 32 questions
Social Security Number and W-4
Real Purpose of the Social Security Number Revealed!
Verbally Counter-offering a Government Agent's Notice
WHEN ALL CRIMES ARE COMMERCIAL
Winning with Written Words
Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports Expose
Fraud
- 2
CAFRs Are the True State of the State, Not
Budgets
Silent
Weapons for Quiet Wars
Marcella Brooks
served as foreman of the jury in the trial of
Whitey Harrell. Her account of
the deliberations of this jury is both powerful and stirring due to
the facts of the situation, combined with her tremendous personal
credibility.
Personally, I find these fourteen minutes to be one of the most
powerful accounts anyone could show to those who doubt the legitimacy
of issues raised by the Tax Movement. Click here for 14 minute clip of
the
VIDEO
A complete copy
of the June 29, 2000, Legality of Income Tax Conference video may be
obtained at the We the People Foundation Web site, by email at
acta@capital.net
or by telephone at (518) 656-3578
Obama Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel Tops
Recipients of Wall Street Money
Henry H. Klein - Jewish Martyr
for American Freedom
Global Economic Criminals -
2 -
3
Zionists Subjugate Our Nations by Controlling
Our Political Parties
Choosing Evil – Are Elections the Great American
Illusion?
Inverted Totalitarianism US Politics &
Government
Brave New World 2008- Loving Your Servitude
Federal judge tells trust to show clear mortgage
documentation in foreclosures
Errors in loan documents can save strapped
homeowners
Woman Tried to Prevent the Financial Mess Silenced
by Greenspan, Rubin, Summers
Politicians, lobbyists shielded financiers - Lack of
liability laws fueled firms' avarice - 1
Mortgage system crumbled while regulators jousted -
2
Bailout in the Public Interest Should Not Reward
Profiteers
Pork and Toy Arrows: the Bailout Bill of 2008
Bailout by Stealth
Naked Short Selling and Phantom Stock by
Criminals in the Financial Markets
Money and Votes in
Last Debate Over Bank Deregulation
Panic Consolidate Game Over but Not for Gold and
Silver
The Inevitable End of the Central Banking and
Political Money Regime
Fraud in Global Economy: The Law of Supply and
Demand Is Dead for Gold and Silver
Hedge Funds, Naked Short Selling, Phantom Stocks
and Stock Market Collapse-
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9 -
10 -
11 -
12-
13 -
14 -
15 -
16 -
17
The Coming Collapse of the Modern Banking
System: Staring Into the Abyss
Economic Collapse of 2008 An Inside Job
-
2
Behind the Stock Market Illusion is Government
Collusion
The Slide, the slide, the long coming sliiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiide
The Condition of the
Dollar
I Want The Earth Plus 5%
-- an allegory that's not a fairy tale.
Collapse of the Dollar:
How America Was Set Up to Take a Fall
Confronting the Illegal Money System
The Federal Reserve Dollar is Private Money
Derived from Private Credit
Billions for Bankers - Debts for the People
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
Real Story of Money is Global Control
War and Emergency Power Act Portal to
Dictatorship
-
2
-
3 -
4 -
5 -
6 -
7 -
8 -
9
Shatter the Illusions - Patriots Must Reject the
Two-Party System
TechnoFascism Is Totalitarianism
Hidden in the Form of Democracy
CPS Corruption and Human Trafficking Exposed in
San Luis Obispo County - A Mother's Story
CPS Corruption and Human Trafficking Exposed
in San Luis Obispo
Pledging Allegiance to the All Powerful State
Promoting Pentagon Propaganda
Allied War Crimes 1941-1950
In Eisenhower's Death Camps - A US
Prison Guard's Story
US War Crimes in World War II: -
2
The Firebombing of Dresden
Fortress Iran: Cutting through the War
Propaganda
Bush Crime Family Dictatorship
Smedley Butler: Marine Corps Legend:
War Is a Racket
Who Makes Profits from War?
Who Pays Bill for Wars?
How to Smash This War Racket!
To Hell with War!
The Club of Rome
The Limits to Growth
Manipulating Public Opinion
Edward Bernays Father of Spin
Vance Packard
Hidden Persuaders
History as a Tool of Propaganda
Origin of Holocaust Propaganda
The Origin of the Legend of the Six Million
Fake Holocaust Memoirs
Zionist Nationalist Myth of Enforced Exile -
Israel Deliberately Forgets Its History - Schlomo Sand
Deconstructing the Walls of Jericho: Who Are the
Jews?
The Wandering Who?
by Gilad Atzmon
The Club of Rome
The Limits to Growth
Manipulating Public Opinion
Edward Bernays Father of Spin
Vance Packard
Hidden Persuaders
The Club of Rome
The Limits to Growth
Report from Iron Mountain on the Possibility and Desirability of Peace -
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Food As a Weapon to Control People
Global Food Cartel an Instrument for Starvation
-
2 -
3 -
4
Concerns grow that Canadian plan will wipeout
alternative news sites and spread to US
Anthropology on Trial: The Mead - Freeman
Controversy
Hoaxing of Margaret Mead
Stamping out Dissent in Science
How Scientific Censorship Works
Suppression of Inconvenient Facts in Physics
-
2 -
3 -
4
Are Carbon Emissions the Cause of Global
Warming?
Chris Landsea Leaves IPCC
IPCC and the Nature of Consensus
The Scientific Consensus on Climate Change
Carbon cycle modelling and CO2 -
2 -
3 -
4
Fire and Ice Doomsday Alarmism Then and Now
-
2 -
3
Global Warming: Greenhouse Effect a Mirage
Global Warming: The Myth of Greenhouse Gases
Greenhouse Gas Facts and Fantasies
Lynching of Carbon Dioxide the Innocent Source
of Life -
2 -
3
IPCC Hockey Stick A New Low in Climate Science
-
2 -
3 -
4
Sun's Shifts May Cause Global Warming
Sun's Direct Role in
Global Warming Underestimated
Climate change confirmed but global warming is
cancelled
Global Warming as Religion and not Science
Prejudiced Authors Prejudiced Findings
-
2
The planet is burning
Let’s party!
Establish a Family Foundation
to obtain the tax savings, transfer tax liability, create a lucrative
retirement income, and establish a legacy
...
here |
|
DirtGlue and DustLess
are two new cost-effective, eco-friendly products made in the USA for
superior dust suppression in mining, industrial parking, and construction.
Soil stabilization, erosion control, dust control.
Hydroseeders!
Using DirtGlue Polymer Emulsion instead of your regular tackifier is a much
more effective and cost competitive solution to prevent run-offs and
accelerate germination.
ArenaKleen-No More Dust in Horse Riding
and Training Arenas!
ArenaKleen is an all natural, environmentally
safe dust control solution for horse arenas and equestrian facilities.
Eliminate dust.
Bank Fraud in Australia is Systemic -
part 2 -
part 3
Bank Fraud in Australia Is a Step Toward
Controlling the Economy and the People
Unfinished Business: Searching for a National
Conscience
Crucifixion and Resurrection
Bank Fraud Exposed - Money out of YOUR Pocket!
Bank Fraud in Australia is Systemic -
part 2 -
part 3
The Foreign Currency Loan Experience in 1980s
Australia: Dwyer v Commonwealth Bank of Australia -
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
The Quade Appeal on Decision vs CBA
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Bank Fraud in Australia Is a Step Toward
Controlling the Economy and the People
Bank Fraud in Australia Is Systemic and Affects
All Australians
The Banks and Small
Business Borrowers: case studies of adversity by Evan Jones
1
-
Introduction
2 -
Goonans
3 -
Paul Buckman
4 -
The Walter family
5 -
The McMinns
6 -
Lynton Freeman
7 -
Ross Delahunty
8 -
Keith Smith
9 -
The Somersets
10-Conclusion
Articles by Evan Jones
The NAB and Its Publicity Grabs
Innovation at the NAB and Grab
NAB accused of dirty tricks in Queensland
Bank Fraud and John Howard
Australian Four Pillars Bank Policy
Document Discovery and the Australian Courts
Banks Behaving Badly
When the Bankers became Con-men
NABbed - an overcharging scandal involving the
biggest Australian bank
**********************
A Case Study in the
Adverse Small Business Environment in Australia
The Walter Family and
the National Australia Bank
-
part 2
The Victorian Courts
-
part 2
The Industry and the
Federal Authorities
The State of Victoria
and the Bracks Government
The NAB and the New
Public Relations Program
The Regulators, the Law
and Bank Malpractice
-
part 2
Conclusion and
References
Final Warning: A History of the New World Order
Australian Bank Malpractice: Crucifixion and Resurrection
Australian Justice, Court Jesters, and
Constitutional Crisis
Unfinished Business: Searching for a National
Conscience
The Australian Bank Heist Condoned by Reserve Bank
Watchdog
Limitations
of the Federal District Court
issues explained
facts
conclusion and recommendations
sample letters
The Cash Cows of Personal Debt
Pycnogenol--the
natural super-antioxidant for relief of most chronic disorders
Seroctin--the
natural serotonin enhancer to reduce stress and depression, and
enjoy better sleep
Plant by Nature is Organic Gardening Nature's Way
Accelerated Equity can
help you own your home in half to one third the time and save many
thousands of dollars.
Dream Catchers
of the Seventh Fire
A New Beginning: A
Practical Course in Miracles
1 INTRODUCTION
2 HISTORY OF COMMERCE
3 RESPONSIBILITY
4 REDEMPTION
5
POWER OF ACCEPTANCE
6
BEING A DIPLOMAT
7
BEING A SOVEREIGN
8
PRIVATE BANKING
Drug Smuggling
Is Another Way that the Money Powers Have Profited
from Control of Government
False Flag Attacks on the Jews in Iraq in 1950-
2 -
3
The Lavon Affair: Another Mossad
False Flag Operation
False Flag Attack on the USS Liberty in 1967
Abu Nidal Mossad Terrorist
False Flag Bombing of the US Marines in Beirut
False Flag Attack on the USS Liberty in 1967
Nick Berg and 9-11
An Independent Investigation of 9-11 and its Zionist Connection
911 was a Day of Infamy
FEMA on Target
Fairy Tale at Emma E. Booker Elementary
Seven 9-11 Hijackers Are Alive and Well
Framing bin Laden
NOT WANTED in connection with the events of
September 11, 2001
Employer of the Dancing Israelis Got $498,750
from SBA before 9-11
Demolition of the World Trade Center
World Trade Center 7
Demolition
Towering Inferno
Jet Fuel at the World Trade Center
Law of Free Fall and 9-11
Such an Act Could Not Be Imagined
A Missile Not Flight 77
Rabbi Dov Zakheim Zionist
9-11 Cell Phone Use Was a Hoax
Flight 93 Crash -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
6
9-11 Has Shown the Face of the New World Order
They Hate Us for Our Freedoms
London Tube Train Bombings Were an Inside Job
The Mythical Lincoln
Pledging Allegiance to the All Powerful State
Allied War Crimes 1941-1950
In Eisenhower's Death Camps - A US
Prison Guard's Story
US War Crimes in World War II: -
2
Promoting Pentagon Propaganda
Fortress Iran: Cutting through the War
Propaganda
History as a Tool of Propaganda
Origin of Holocaust Propaganda
The Origin of the Legend of the Six Million
Anne Frank Life and Times
The Truth about the Diary of Anne Frank
Iyman Al Hams: Dying of a Young Girl
A Prominent Propagandist: Elie Wiesel
Elie Wiesel: Night and the Holocaust
-
2
The 1988 'Holocaust' Testimony of Joseph Burg
An Interview With JOSEF GINSBURG
|
|
Deceptive IRS Code Words "Income," "Person,"
"Taxpayer," "Shall," and "Must."
Learn to Decipher the Internal Revenue Code and IRS
Publications
The Internal Revenue Code
(IRC) is a masterpiece of deception designed
to mislead Citizens into believing that individuals are subject to federal
income tax. The Code was written by attorneys for the Internal Revenue
Service (IRS), and contains a series of directory statutes using the word
"shall", with provisions that are requirements for corporations, but not for
individuals. Even members of Congress are generally unaware of the deceptive
legal meanings of certain terms that are consistently used in the IRC. These
terms have legal definitions for use in the IRC that are very different from
the general understanding of the meaning of the words.
Lack of knowledge of these legal definitions causes misunderstanding by
uninformed Citizens who are confused as to the correct interpretation of
both the IRC and the true meaning of the tricky wording in IRS instructional
publications and news articles. However, when you understand the legal
definitions of these terms, the deception is easily recognized and the
limited application of the Code becomes clear. This understanding will help
you to see that filing income tax forms and paying income taxes must be
voluntary acts for most Americans because the United States Constitution
forbids the
federal government to impose any tax directly upon individuals.
INCOME
Most people mistakenly believe all moneys they receive, such as wages,
salaries, and tips, are "income". However, for years, IRS publication
#525, entitled "Taxable and Nontaxable Income", has acknowledged that
wages and salaries are not "income". Publication #525 states: "Wages
and salaries are the main source of income for most people." In the
court decision of Graves vs People of the State of New York ex rel
O'Keefe, 59 S.Ct. 595 (1939), the United States Supreme Court ruled
that a source of income is not income, and the source is not subject
to income tax. In that decision, the Court stated: "A tax on income is
not economically or legally a tax on its source." However, wages,
salaries, commissions, and tips (sources) are considered to be
"income" for an individual when he lists them as "income" on an IRS
tax return form. When he signs the tax form under penalty of perjury,
he has made a voluntary oath that his wages, salary, commissions, and
tips listed on the return are "income" and that he is subject to the
tax.
In the still standing decision of Brushaber vs Union Pacific Railroad
Company, 240 U.S. 1, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the
federal income tax is an excise tax under the Sixteenth Amendment (the
income tax amendment). The Court explained that the income tax cannot
be imposed as a direct tax (a tax on individuals or on property)
because the United States Constitution still requires that all direct
taxes must be apportioned among the States. "Apportioned" means that a
direct tax is laid upon the State governments in proportion to each
State's population. The Court ruled that income tax can be
constitutional only as an indirect (excise) tax -- that is, a tax on
profits earned by corporations or privileges granted by government. In
other words, said the Supreme Court, in order for there to be
"income", there must be profits or gains received in the exercise of a
privilege granted by government. As an example, a lawyer is granted
the government privilege of being an officer of the government court
when he represents clients in litigation.
At law, labor is property. In fact, the Supreme Court has identified
labor as man's most precious property. Therefore, the exchange of
one's labor for wages or salary (which are also property) is
considered by law to be an exchange of properties of equal value in
which there is no gain or profit. Such a property exchange of equal
value cannot be taxed because there is no profit or gain. Also, one
who works in an ordinary occupation is not a recipient of any
privilege granted by government, because he is merely exercising his
constitutionally guaranteed right to work and earn an living. Courts
have repeatedly ruled that no tax may be placed upon the exercise of
rights. Their reasoning was sensible. If the exercise of rights could
be taxed, government could destroy them by excessive rates of
taxation.
Items that the law includes in "income" are described in Code sections
listed under the title of "Items Specifically Included in Gross
Income", which covers Sections 71 through 86. Nowhere in these
sections and nowhere else in the Code is there any mention of wages,
salaries, commissions, or tips as being "income". For example, to
deceive and intimidate waitresses into declaring their tips to be
income is a double fraud. First, tips are gifts, not wages. According
to the IRC, gifts are not subject to income tax. In fact, even if tips
were considered to be wages, they would still not be "income" and
would not be subject to an income (excise) tax unless one enters them
as "income" on a tax return form.
PERSON
People generally consider the term "person" to mean an individual
only. But, IRC Section 7701, entitled "Definitions" , includes a
corporation, a trust, an estate, a partnership, an association, or
company as being a "person". All of these legal entities are "persons"
at law, so it is legally correct but very misleading when the federal
income (excise) tax on corporations is described by the deceptive
title of "Personal Income Tax". This misleading description leads most
people to believe that it means a tax on individuals.
The legal term "person" has an even more restricted definition when
used in IRC Chapter 75, which contains all the criminal penalties in
the Code. In Section 7343 of that Chapter, a "person" subject to
criminal penalties is defined as:
... [A]n officer or employee of a corporation, or a member or employee
of a partnership, who, as such officer, employee or member, is under a
duty to perform the act in respect of which the violation occurs.
An individual who is not in such a capacity is not defined as a
"person" subject to criminal penalties. Unprivileged individuals, who
do not impose the income (excise) tax upon themselves by filing
returns, are not subject to the tax and they are not "persons" who can
lawfully be subjected to criminal charges for not filing a return or
not paying income tax.
Sections of the Code relating to the requirements for filing returns,
keeping records, and disclosing information state that those sections
apply to "every person liable" or "any person made liable". These
descriptions mean "any person who is liable for the tax". They do not
state or mean that all persons are liable. The only persons liable are
those "persons" (legal entities such as corporations) who owe an
income (excise) tax, and are therefore subject to the requirements of
the IRC. If you substitute the word "corporation" for the term
"person" (a corporation is a person at law) when reading the Code or
other articles and publications relating to income tax, the true
meaning of the Code becomes more apparent.
A TAX PAYER IS NOT A "TAXPAYER"
The deceptive term "taxpayer" is a legal term created by combining the
words "tax" and "payer". The general understanding of the term's
meaning is different from its legal definition in the IRC. Section
7701(a)(14) gives the legal definition of the term "taxpayer" in
relation to income tax. It states: "The term 'taxpayer' means any
person subject to any internal revenue tax." (All internal revenue
taxes are excise taxes.) Note that the section does not say that all
persons are "taxpayers" subject to internal revenue tax. Corporations
are "taxpayers", for they are "persons" subject to an internal revenue
(excise) tax.
The term "taxpayer" is used extensively throughout the IRC, in IRS
publications, news articles, and instructional literature as a verbal
trap to make uninformed Citizens believe that all individuals are
subject to federal income tax and to the requirements of the IRC.
These materials state that "taxpayers" are required to file returns,
keep records, supply information, etc. Such statements are technically
correct, because "taxpayers" are those legal "persons" previously
described that are subject to an excise tax, but unprivileged
individuals are not "taxpayers" within the meaning of the IRC.
The confusion about the meaning of the term leads most people to
mistakenly assume that they are "taxpayers" because they pay other
taxes such as sales taxes and real estate taxes. Those people are tax
payers, not "taxpayers" as defined in the IRC. When they read articles
and publications related to income tax, describing the legal
requirements for "taxpayers", they erroneously believe that the term
applies to them as individuals. It is very important to understand
that the IRC requirements apply to IRC-defined "taxpayers" only, and
not to unprivileged individuals. Corporations and other
government-privileg ed legal entities are "taxpayers under the Internal
Revenue Code"; unprivileged individuals are not, unless they
voluntarily file income tax returns showing they owe taxes, thus
legally placing themselves in the classification of "taxpayers".
Because of its legal definition, the term "taxpayer" should never be
used in relation to income tax, except to describe those legal
entities subject to a federal excise tax.
"SHALL" means "MAY"
In general use, the word "shall" is a word of command with a mandatory
meaning. In the IRC, "shall" is a directory word that has a mandatory
meaning when applied to corporations. The IRC contains a series of
directory statutes using the word "shall" in describing the actions
called for in those sections of the law. The provisions of these
directory statutes are requirements for corporations, because
corporations are created by government and, consequently, are subject
to government direction and control. Since corporations are granted
the privilege to exist and operate by government-issued charters, they
do not have the constitutionally guaranteed rights of individuals.
This government-granted privilege legally obligates corporations to
make a "return" of profits and gains earned in the exercise of their
privileged operations when directed to do so by law. This is why the
tax form is called a "return".
However, directory words in the Code merely imply that individuals are
required to perform certain acts, but directory words are not
requirements for individuals when a mandatory interpretation of the
directory words would conflict with the constitutionally guaranteed
rights of individuals. Courts have repeatedly ruled that in statutes,
when a mandatory meaning of the word "shall" would create a
constitutional conflict, "shall" must be defined as meaning "may". The
following are quotes from a few of these decisions. In the decision of
Cairo & Fulton R.R. Co. vs Hecht, 95 U.S. 170, the U.S. Supreme Court
stated:
As against the government the word "shall" when used in statutes, is
to be construed as "may," unless a contrary intention is manifest.
In the decision of George Williams College vs Village of Williams Bay,
7 N.W.2d 891, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin stated:
"Shall" in a statute may be construed to mean "may" in order to avoid
constitutional doubt.
In the decision of Gow vs Consolidated Coppermines Corp., 165 Atlantic
136, the court stated:
If necessary to avoid unconstitutionality of a statute, "shall" will
be deemed equivalent to "may" ...
Sections 6001 and 6011 of the IRC are cited in the Privacy Act notice
in the IRS 1040 instruction booklet in order to lead individuals to
believe they are required to perform services for tax collectors. Note
the use of the word "shall" in the following sections of the Code:
Section 6001 states:
Every person liable for any tax imposed by this title, or for the
collection thereof, shall keep such records, render such statements,
make such returns, and comply with such rules and requirements as the
Secretary may from time to time prescribe.
Section 6011 states:
When required by regulations prescribed by the Secretary any person
made liable for any tax imposed by this title, or for the collection
thereof, shall make a return or statement according to the forms and
regulations prescribed by the Secretary.
Note that Sections 6001 and 6011 apply to "every person liable" and
"any person made liable", but not to "individuals" . However, there is
no section of the IRC that makes individuals liable for payment of
income tax because any law imposing a federal tax on individuals would
be unconstitutional, for it would violate the taxing limitations in
the U.S. Constitution which prohibit direct taxation of individuals by
the federal government. People are often confused when reading the
Code because, under Subtitle A, Chapter 1, which covers income taxes,
Part 1 of Subchapter A has the misleading title of "Tax on
Individuals" . The title is misleading because Part 1 imposes the tax
on "income", but contains no requirement for individuals to pay it.
But an individual becomes a "person liable" for the tax when he files
an income tax form, thereby swearing that he is liable for (owes) the
tax.
The Privacy Act notice in the instruction booklet for IRS Form 1040
also shows that disclosure of information by individuals is not
required. The notice states:
Our legal right to ask for information is Internal Revenue Code
sections 6001 and 6011 and their regulations.
The IRS does not say that those sections require individuals to submit
the information; those sections only give the IRS the authority to ask
for it.
Section 6012 states:
Returns with respect to income taxes under Subtitle A shall be made by
the following: (1)(A) Every individual having for the taxable year
gross which equals or exceeds the exemption amount ...."
Subsections (2) through (6) list corporations, estates, trusts,
partnerships, and certain political organizations as also being
subject to this section.
Any requirements compelling unprivileged individuals to keep records,
make returns and statements, or to involuntarily perform any other
services for tax collectors, would be violations of constitutionally
guaranteed rights.
The Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution forbids
compelling individuals to perform services involuntarily. The
Amendment states:
Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude,
except as punishment for
crimes whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist
within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.
The Fourth Amendment in the Bill of Rights of the United States
Constitution states that the people's right to privacy of their papers
shall not be violated by government. To compel individuals to disclose
information taken from their papers would violate this right.
The Fifth Amendment in the Bill of Rights protects the right of
individuals not to be required to be witnesses against themselves. To
compel individuals to disclose information by submitting statements or
information on a tax return form, all of which could be used against
them in criminal prosecutions, would violate their Fifth Amendment
right.
These examples show some constitutional conflicts that would result
from defining the word "shall" as meaning "is required to". Thus,
"shall" in the above mentioned statutes must be interpreted as meaning
"may". Consequently, for individuals, keeping records, making
statements, and making returns are clearly voluntary actions that are
not required by law.
"HAVING" INCOME
According to the wording of Section 6012 previously discussed, it is a
directory statute which pertains to the filing of income tax returns,
and applies only to those individuals "having income". Since the word
"having" has no deceptive legal definition in the Code, its legal
meaning is the same as its customary meaning in general use. Although
dictionaries define the word "have" as meaning "possess" or "hold in
one's possession", the IRS fraudulently misinterprets "having income"
as meaning "receiving gross receipts" when applying Section 6012 to
individuals.
To better understand the meaning of "having income", consider this
example: If during one year a corporation receives ten million dollars
(gross receipts) from the sales of its products, and has expense items
of nine million dollars, the corporation has a profit (income) of one
million dollars. When tax liabilities are determined at the end of the
year, the corporation has (possesses) an increase in its assets (a
gain) of one million dollars. But, if the corporation' s expenses equaled its gross receipts, it would then have (possess) no profit or
gain (income) and it would owe no income tax.
Now, consider another example: If during one year an individual
receives fifteen thousand dollars in wages (gross receipts) from the
sale of his labor, and has expenses of fifteen thousand dollars to
sustain himself and his family, he then has (possesses) no increase in
assets. Although he has (possesses) nothing more than he had at the
beginning of the year, IRS agents consider him as "having income" of
fifteen thousand dollars. IRS agents ignore the fact that his wages
were not income according to their own publications!
"MUST" means "MAY"
Most people have never studied the IRC and their understanding of the
law is generally based on hearsay, newspaper articles and IRS
instructional materials. These instructions make frequent use of the
deceptive word "must" in describing the things that the IRS wants you
to do, because "must" is a forceful word that people mistakenly
believe to mean "are required". Very few people realize that "must" is
a directory word similar to "shall" and that, in IRS instructions to
the public, it means "may", the same as the word "shall".
In the legal definition of the word "must" in Black's Law Dictionary,
it states:
... [I]t is often used in a merely directory sense, and consequently
is a synonym for the word "may" not only in the permissive sense of
that word, but also in the mandatory sense which it sometimes has.
Because of the constitutional conflicts explained earlier in this
article, the word "must", similar to the word "shall", cannot have a
mandatory meaning for individuals. It therefore means "may" when used
in IRS instruction publications.
The IRS instructions for Form 1040 state that you "must" file a return
if you have certain amounts of income. IRS withholding instructions
state that employers "must" withhold money from paychecks for income
tax, "must" withhold social security tax (an income tax also), and
"must" send to the IRS any W-4 withholding statement claiming
exemption from withholding, if the wages are expected to usually
exceed $200 per week. An understanding of the legal meaning of the
word "must" exposes the deception by the IRS and makes it clear that
the actions called for are voluntary actions for individuals that are
not required by law. If these actions were required by law, the
instructions would not use the word "must", but would say that the
actions were "required".
FREE SOVEREIGN CITIZENS
Prior to the American Revolution, the American colonists were subjects
of the English Kings and were subject to their orders and edicts. But,
according to the Declaration of Independence and the United States
Constitution, the Citizens of our country are free sovereign
individuals. They are not subjects of government, nor are they subject
to mandatory direction or control by the federal government. Except
for duties such as military draft and jury duty, the federal
government has no authority to require unprivileged individuals to
perform services for government.
There is no section in the IRC requiring individuals to pay income tax
or file income tax returns, because the federal government has no
constitutional authority to impose any tax directly upon individuals
or to require them involuntarily to keep records, make statements,
make returns, or perform any acts for the convenience of federal tax
collectors. But, if an individual files a return, his voluntary action
of signing the form, thereby swearing under penalty of perjury that he
owes the tax, is an acknowledgement under oath that he is subject to
the tax (a "taxpayer") and is therefore subject to the directory
statutes of the IRC.
The reader should remember the legal definitions of the various terms
and the information about the rights of Citizens presented in this
article whenever he reads the IRC and other materials relating to
income tax in order to better understand the correct meaning of
whatever they read.
Internal Revenue Code
Section 6654(e)(2)(c) states:...no tax liability...if....the individual was
a citizen or resident of the United States throughout the preceding taxable
year. IRS contends the success of the SELF-ASSESSMENT system depends on
VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE
All
human rights are natural and cannot be taken away by any legitimate means.
This is the premise of the Declaration of Independence. The United States
Government can only exercise powers given to it by "We the People" through
the U.S. Constitution. The "income
tax" is an INDIRECT TAX. There is no section of law in the Internal
Revenue Code (Title 26 USC) making a CITIZEN or a RESIDENT working and
living WITHIN A STATE OF THE UNION, LIABLE to pay the INCOME
(indirect/excise/duty) TAX.
Internal Revenue Code
Section 6654(e)(2)(c) states:...no tax liability...if....the individual was
a citizen or resident of the United States throughout the preceding taxable
year. IRS contends the success of the SELF-ASSESSMENT system depends on
VOLUNTARY COMPLIANCE
All
human rights are natural and cannot be taken away by any legitimate means.
This is the premise of the Declaration of Independence. The United States
Government can only exercise powers given to it by "We the People" through
the U.S. Constitution. The "income
tax" is an INDIRECT TAX. There is no section of law in the Internal
Revenue Code (Title 26 USC) making a CITIZEN or a RESIDENT working and
living WITHIN A STATE OF THE UNION, LIABLE to pay the INCOME
(indirect/excise/duty) TAX.
REAL Freedom
Library
History of Banking Fraud:
The Coming Battle
By M. W. WALBERT
The Coming Battle
documents from Congressional records, newspaper reports and writings by
the founding fathers and others a chronology of events long forgotten that
shaped our fledgling nation from 1776 to 1899. Read about the manipulation
of our money and its supply, the intentional creation of recessions,
depressions and panics, manipulation of the stock markets, and the
demonetization of silver.
Secrets of the Federal Reserve
by Eustace Mullins
Eustace Mullins' carefully
researched and documented treatise picks up from Walbert's expose' of
control of the money supply and the economy and
brings it to the mid 1980's.
The
World Order
by Eustace Mullins
How control of the world's money has inexorably led to an ever tighter
grip on control of the world's people.
Brave New World
by Aldous Huxley
Huxley presents a dystopic view of a future
in which mind-control creates a harmonized society stratified into classes
suitably manipulated and deprived to carry out work tasks with a hive
mentality. A foreign element is inserted when a high ranking Alpha brings a
Native American from a Reservation and a new perspective on freedom gnaws at
the fabric of the propaganda matrix.
Propaganda
by Edward Bernays
Walter
Lippmann's book, Public Opinion, published in 1922, detailed the
study in which he and Edward Bernays were involved while in London during
the First World War. It had to do with painting pictures inside people's
heads, which were cunningly and deliberately designed by expert craftsmen to
mislead not only individuals but entire societies.
Pawns in the Game
by William Guy Carr
This is the classic expose' of the New World Order from a Commander in
the Canadian Navy through the first half of the 20th Century.
Commander Carr was introduced to the Hidden Hand early in his life and
pursuing its mysteries became a lifelong mission.
Social Credit
by CH Douglas
In every country of the world the global financial system has
repeatedly been brought to the Bar of
Public Opinion as the chief factor in world unrest, and there is little
doubt that the jury of We the People has confirmed the Verdict somewhat rhetorically
expressed by Mr. William Jennings Bryan in his famous election speech: "The
money power preys upon the nation in times of peace, and conspires against
it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent
than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. It denounces, as public
enemies, all who question its methods, or throw light upon its crimes. It
can only be overthrown by the awakened conscience of the nation."
Social Credit by C.H. Douglas can clarify the issues from which we can
move forward to create a financial system that is fair and equitable.
Final Warning: A History of the New World Order
by
by David
Allen Rivera
David Allen Rivera has assembled a very carefully written history that
can serve us well. To have been
ignored in the history books, by the colleges and
universities, the print and electronic media, and the entire
national and international discussion shows their power to control
the flow of information as much as they control the flow of money.
What they intend to do with this power and influence should be one
of the most vital topics of conversation.
An Independent Investigation of 9-11 and its Zionist Connection
by Dr. Albert Pastore
History
provides patterns that we can learn to recognize so that we can avoid
them. Properly presented, history provides any of us with
invaluable tools to help us see behind the illusions. No one who
is paying attention to the patterns and their application to today's
events would fail to miss the signals or the dog that fails to bark.
Uranium Wars by Leuren Moret
How control of the world's people has inexorably led to wider use of
depopulation methods which include spreading radioactivity in food,
water, air, and the human genome.
Taking Back Your Power
by Allen Aslan Heart
WHAT CAN YOU DO? Stop playing THEIR game. Take back
your power. Stop paying taxes that are not legal or lawful. Stop paying
bills you don't really owe. Debt Elimination! Stop using THEIR money. There ARE ways if you
open your mind and look for the gaps in their fences that keep the sheeple
in their pasture. Are you chattel or a real person? You are the one who
makes that choice.
|
