|
|
And that's literally how it would begin. By the end of the third day, it
would be all over -- a state of martial law. We're not talking about war,
now; this is just economic collapse.
There's no military implication here, no political, no social implication or
policy directive thereunto. This is strictly economic collapse. By the end
of Day Three, effectively, all banks in the world will be shut down, all
paper currencies will become valueless. Martial
law would be declared. There would be no continuing transactions, at least
for a period of time, of commodities. All providers of fuels and foods would
be shut down automatically.
They have this in great detail too. U.S. Department of Defense Special 117th
Assault Unit would parachute in to seize control of the cattle yards in
Oklahoma City. This is how well it's planned. In other words, economic
collapse would automatically involve expansive military action and control.
By the end of the third day, when you no longer have a domestic medium of
exchange, you have to have secured food and fuel stocks. You've got to have
troops that have secured distribution points where there is food and fuel
stocks, warehouses, tanks, etc. Otherwise people are just going to go get
them, and the people have to know that if they try to go break into that
store and steal that loaf of bread, they're going to be shot.
Protocols for environmental disasters are called 'scaling-circle scenarios.'
'Scaling circles' is a Department of Defense euphemism. It's also used in
FEMA, OEM and other emergency management services. In environmental
catastrophes, which are going to become national or global, it's got to
start someplace. It's going to start in one very small, specific area.
Therefore what happens is that the immediate force containment is the
greatest in the first circle, to try to contain the spread of the disaster
and keep it within that circle.
The environmental problem, to whatever extent it's possible, before it
spreads, will be neutralized or mitigated, in order to keep that catastrophe
within that circle, or, if it is likely that it is to escape that circle, to
attack whatever it is in such a fashion as to mitigate its strength and its
ability to contaminate or otherwise affect other areas.
In the case of earthquakes, for instance, affecting the west coast,
beginning at Mt. Rainier and moving southward -- that's a different type of
scenario. That does not include as much Department of Defense involvement.
It includes separate protocols, wherein mostly FEMA and OEM act as the
senior coordinating agencies between municipal, county and state disaster
and containment, which is called Disaster and Containment Units. Federal
troops would only be brought in for the purposes of maintaining control.
In a military or economic collapse situation, National Guard units would
provide any spare help they could in combating whatever the problem is.
Federal troops would be used in order to have the specific authority simply
to shoot anyone. There are plans for all sorts of scenarios. The
economic-disaster scenario is the one I always found the most intriguing
because it is the one that is least understood by the American people.
Military control would be necessary when lines begin to form at the banks,
people trying to access their money. But that wasn't even anticipated as a
big problem. Lines would form at the banks, but it was not even envisioned
until sometime on Day Three because the American people wouldn't get it. It
would be announced that the stock markets are down 2000 or 3000 points, and
since we've always been taught they'll come back, the people would still be
buying stocks.
You could count on everybody remaining in ignorance all the way down because
the American people have never been taught Economics 101. The American
people wouldn't realize the full extent of it until the markets were closed
on the third day, or until the time when they went down to cash a check and
the bank was closed with soldiers out in front. Then they would go down and
see the gas stations closed. They see the local supermarket has been
shuttered, and there are federal troops in front of it. Then they might
begin to catch on. And remember -- it's not just federal troops. In
emergency-collapse protocols, even before the declaration of a formal state
of emergency or a state of martial law, the local military authorities
within any given county or jurisdiction have the ability to essentially
militarize anyone, that is, any civilian. This would be more than just
deputizing civilians. It's federal. In other words, they would have the
ability to militarize and give military authority to a civilian force. This
would include not only police and the sheriffs and state police, but all
local law enforcement that exists below the state level would be immediately
militarized. They wouldn't take just anybody like they did
in Iraq. It would be like the military when they call for volunteers. Then
they'd have everybody and their brother-in-law volunteering, waving around
the American flag and so on.
You've got a lot of pickup-driving guys in this country with the gun racks
in the back and the Confederate flag flying. So you start waving the
American flag in front of their face and say, Hey, you're going to get your
chance you always wanted -- to fit your potbelly inside an army uniform and
carry a gun and shoot people. How appealing would that be?
And besides, if you do this, then you're going to get to eat.
In other words, this is how it would unfold over three days, but, in fact,
very few Americans would know what to do about it or how to take any
precautions. They wouldn't have a clue because they don't understand enough
about economics to know what is happening. So that's what it is -- Economic
Armageddon. If the Bush-Cheney regime is re-installed into power, that is
effectively what Comptroller General David Walker is saying.
In conclusion, since there is very little the people of the United States
can do to protect themselves, we're not going to make any suggestions of how
to protect yourselves because there's very little you can do.
We could tell you to go out and buy gold coins and bury them in the coffee
can in the back yard and go to your nearest survivalist store, but, frankly,
that's useless. In the last analysis, it's a lot of hype. There is very
little the average US citizen could do. [At the minimum, you should stock
food, water, and medical supplies, if not a bit of silver or gold. Even
seeds could be a hedge against hard times both as barter and as a source of
food which could also be a useful form of barter.]
The only thing that can prevent this, as the Comptroller alluded to when he
was asked by Barbara Walters, “How do we prevent reaching the problem by
2009? He said simply, "A change of regimes."
So how do you prevent it? Don't vote for Bush and Cheney -- and hope that
Bush does not use his emergency powers to cancel or postpone the election by
edict, powers which you, the flag-waving citizens, have given him.
All flag-waving citizens, be warned. If you want to vote for Bush-Cheney
again, make sure you got plenty of Spam on hand. [Even if you didn't
participate in the fraudulent elections, make sure you go plenty of "Spam"
on hand. Bush-Cheney WERE elected and 2009 is not too far down the road.]
Here's an interesting and humorous aside. A couple of days ago, Hormel
Foods, which makes Spam, announced that in the last six months there have
been record sales of Spam in the United States the survivalists' food of
choice. After all, they pride themselves on the fact, as the spokesman for
Hormel said, "It is the only food product you can buy
with an expiration that's 50 years."
When everything goes to hell, when all that man has created has turned to
dust again, the final legacy is going to be Spam. It will be the last
surviving item -- when the anthropologists of 20 thousand years from now are
digging sites and they see these enormous mountains of unopened cans of Spam
They'll have monuments to the past out of Spam.
So if Bush-Cheney has a second term in office, there will be some sort of
currency restriction, like Nixon did in 1971. On April 13, 2004, Deputy
Assistant Treasury Secretary John Boine talked about potential currency
restrictions. He used the word that's going to fuel the flames of the
survivalist and gloom-and-doom collapse people.
It's very, very telling that the U.S. Treasury may institute a restriction
on the amount of U.S. dollars that can be converted into gold.
Furthermore, he intimated (and I suspected that this was coming, although
this wouldn't actually become law until Bush-Cheney was in office for second
term one way or another) that the Bush-Cheney regime determines that the
Gold Confiscation Act gives to Treasury the power for so-called forced
disclosure of gold holdings.
I'm not quite sure of the language of the Gold Confiscation Act from 1933.
It just says, "compelled", as in citizens are lawfully compelled to redeem
gold for script. I don't think there was any such provision, which he was
inferring that there is. That was FDR's "Raw Deal" of 1934, when people were
coerced into giving up their gold. But nowhere in this act does it
specifically authorize the Treasury to mandate citizens to report their gold
holdings. So if this gets any press at all, particularly within the circles
of gold bugs and so on, watch out.
Furthermore, on Washington Journal they were talking about how FEMA has
recommended to the Office of Homeland Security to have increased
restrictions regarding citizen hoarding of long-term food and fuel supplies.
That's pretty sinister too.
What they're talking about is the purchase of long-term so-called stores of
survival food. FEMA was talking about some sort of restriction preventing
people from accumulating food stores; putting it simply, that's what it
means. The second point was to increase
restrictions that already exist.
FEMA was recommending even tighter restrictions on citizens building their
own private property underground storage tanks for the purposes of long-term
storage of fuel. The real intent of this is is threefold:
a) to restrict citizens' ability to hoard food;
b) restrict citizens' ability to hoard long-term storage of fuel;
c) the forced identification of citizens to reveal food and fuel stocks they
may be hoarding.
And that, in my opinion, is the real essence. The Bush-Cheney regime was
scared of having the FEMA angle put into the equation because they knew what
it means and how people would interpret it.
They have tried to use environmental legislation to restrict people's
ability to build fuel storage facilities on their own property -- to get
around what the true intent of that was.
But the bigger picture is that if you start to limit citizens' ability to
hoard fuel and food and shake them up by potential forced identification of
gold holdings or forced redemption.
In other words, what you don't want is citizens who have the ability to
store a lot of food and fuel and to own gold because they would be able to
resist state control in the future.
You've got to have every citizen on a rationing card to control the civilian
population. You can't have citizens out there hoarding food and fuel because
then people can say to government, "I ain't taking a rationing card, baby,
with my national ID card. I don't have to. You can't control me through food
and fuel and ever-worthless paper currency."
I used to make fun of these people. But now, things have come full circle on
this debate. The Bush-Cheney regime is making it increasingly clear through
their small changes in policy. Not a lot of people monitor these decisions,
but I do. And the pattern is becoming increasingly clear.
In fact, I would believe that those of the survivalist mentality (the food,
fuel, the gold coins in the coffee can in the back yard) people who think
that way will be ultimately vindicated - if George Bush has a second term in
office.
People should quit making fun of them because they would be vindicated -
even though they were all burned out, twenty-dollared to death, buying books
and tapes, and discredited by mainstream media. It may sound like a hollow
victory, but it won't be a hollow victory for them - them that's got the
Spam...
History of Banking Fraud:
The Coming Battle
By M. W. WALBERT
The Coming Battle
documents from Congressional records, newspaper reports and writings by
the founding fathers and others a chronology of events long forgotten that
shaped our fledgling nation from 1776 to 1899. Read about the manipulation
of our money and its supply, the intentional creation of recessions,
depressions and panics, manipulation of the stock markets, and the
demonetization of silver.
Secrets of the Federal Reserve
by Eustace Mullins
Eustace Mullins' carefully
researched and documented treatise picks up from Walbert's expose' of
control of the money supply and the economy and
brings it to the mid 1980's.
The
World Order
by Eustace Mullins
How control of the world's money has inexorably led to an ever tighter
grip on control of the world's people.
Propaganda
by Edward Bernays
Walter
Lippmann's book, Public Opinion, published in 1922, detailed the
study in which he and Edward Bernays were involved while in London during
the First World War. It had to do with painting pictures inside people's
heads, which were cunningly and deliberately designed by expert craftsmen to
mislead not only individuals but entire societies.
Uranium Wars by Leuren Moret
How control of the world's people has inexorably led to wider use of
depopulation methods which include spreading radioactivity in food,
water, air, and the human genome.
Taking Back Your Power
by Allen Aslan Heart
WHAT CAN YOU DO? Stop playing THEIR game. Take back
your power. Stop paying taxes that are not legal or lawful. Stop paying
bills you don't really owe. Stop using THEIR money. There ARE ways if you
open your mind and look for the gaps in their fences that keep the sheeple
in their pasture. Are you chattel or a real person? You are the one who
makes that choice.
|
