WHEN ALL CRIMES ARE COMMERCIAL
CFR 27 SECTION 72.11
Victimized by our so-called “legal
Have you or a family member been victimized by our so-called “legal system?”
There is help, however it will not come
from an “attorney at law” for they are the problem, not the solution!
The Citizen’s Rights Task Force is here to help. Why? Consider the following
• According to the late Chief Justice
William H. Rehnquist, 100% of the people that are in Federal or State
Penitentiaries are there VOLUNTARILY!!!!! Don’t believe it? We have
some simple “yes” or “no” questions to prove how one is duped into
forfeiting their Rights and trading them for statutory privileges.
• An “attorney at law” is an arm of the state and their FIRST duty is to the
court, then the government… NOT to you! Furthermore, whenever any “duty” to
you interferes with their first duty, YOU are the one that is to take “back
• Think you have “attorney/client privilege” where what you say to an
“attorney at law” remains private? Ever hear of “discovery?” This is where
“your attorney” is ordered to turn over your information to THE STATE that
is attempting to incarcerate you.
• 1 in 32 Americans is either in prison or on parole or probation.
• Over 40% of people admitted into prisons in America are “convicted” under
the “Political Code” and therefore, by definition, Political Prisoners.
Furthermore, since Political Prisoners end up with mandatory longer
sentences, the cumulative effect is that they end up being the majority of
• America’s incarceration rate is now 743 per 100k, the highest in the
• America locks up more people for “Drug Crimes” than all of Europe locks up
for all crimes combined.
• If you go to “trial” in Federal Court, there is a 96% chance of being
“convicted.” Do you really believe that only 4% are innocent?
• It is the “government’s” position that if you do not know your Rights,
then you don’t have any!
• According to 27 CFR 72.11, burglary; counterfeiting; forgery; kidnapping;
larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of weapons; prostitution;
extortion; swindling; and many other things, like simple addiction to drugs
or marihuana use, are considered and defined as “Commercial Crimes” where
you are converted to an object for “commercial use” and Due Process of Law
becomes a farce!
So, what is the solution? Learn and exercise your Rights! They are yours, do
you know them? We are here to help you, however in the end it is YOU who
must stand up for your Rights! Judge Alger Fee stated it very clearly in the
case of US v Johnson, 76 Fed.Supp. 538, that your Rights are “neither
accorded to the passive resistant, nor to the person indifferent thereto.”
Furthermore Judge Fee stated that your Rights “cannot be claimed by attorney
or solicitor” and are only valid “when insisted upon by a BELLIGERENT
claimant in person.” His final warning was clear that “one who is persuaded
by honeyed words or moral suasion to testify or produce documents… simply
loses the protection” of your Rights!
What the Citizen’s Rights Task Force has to offer is NOT for the timid, but
for the one who is ready to stand up and FIGHT for their Rights! If you
don’t care about your Rights, go get an attorney and GO TO JAIL.
For a free “catalog” of Educational Materials, explaining more about how you
can FIGHT for your RIGHTS, send a blank email with the words “Educational
Materials” in the subject line to: CitizensRightsTaskForce@yahoo.com and be
prepared to be amazed!
This is just a quick
outline of research cites that I found while trying to understand
"commercial crimes" as set out in 27 CFR 72.11 below (in part).
27 CRF 72.11 purports to define some crimes as "commercial crimes":
Sec. 72.11 Meaning of
As used in this part, unless the context
otherwise requires, terms shall have the meanings ascribed in this section.
Words in the plural form shall include the singular, and vice versa, and
words importing the masculine gender shall include the feminine. The terms
"includes" and "including" do not exclude things not enumerated which are in
the same general class.
Commercial crimes. Any of the following types of crimes (Federal or State):
Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; counterfeiting; forgery;
kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons;
prostitution (including soliciting, procuring, pandering, white slaving,
keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and
confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or
compounding any of the foregoing crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use
of marihuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime....
I researched the term
"commercial crime" and found next to nothing in the legal resources
available to me. Some of the information I found may not be exactly on
point, but it does raise reasonable questions.
If, maybe, we are all presumed (by silent
judical notice) to be engaged in "commerce" and triable accordingly under
"Merchant Law"/"Commercial Law", perhaps the proper administrative forum to
start an administrative complaint would be the successors to the Interstate
Commerce Commission (ICC):
alphabet-soup agency]: These court folks have the crazy idea that I am
somehow involved in commerce. I don't know where they got that idea. I would
like a determination of status, or of activity, from you."
If we could get the
alphabet-soup agency to make an administrative determination that, for
whatever reason, it does not have jurisdiction because we are not engaged in
commerce, then that should end the complaint by removing it from the
jurisdiction of a possible "commerce court".
1. From A COMPILATION OF THE MESSAGES AND
PAPERS OF THE PRESIDENTS (Bureau of National Literature, Inc., New York,
1911-1914, 1916, 1917) [Vol. XIX] Encyclopedic Index, Commerce Court:
Mann-Elkins act of June 18, 1910, created a new judicial body known as the
Commerce Court to review the decisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission
on appeal and to expedit rate cases formerly tried in the United States
It had the same jurisdiction as Circuit Courts in (1) all cases for the
enforcement, otherwise than by adjudication and collection of a forfeiture
or penalty or by infliction of a criminal punishment, of any order of the
Interstate Commerce Commission other than the payment of money; (2) cases
brought to enjoin, set aside, annul or suspend in whole or part any order of
the Interstate Commerce Commission; (3) such cases as by section three of
the act entitled "An act to further regulate commerce with foreign nations
and among the states" approved Feb. 19, 1903, were authorized to be
maintained in a Circuit Court of the United States; (4) all such mandamus
proceedings as under the provisions of section twenty or section
twenty-three of the act entitled "An act to regulate commerce" approved Feb.
4, 1887, as amended, were authorized to be maintained in a Circuit Court of
the United States.
The jurisdiction of the Commerce Court over cases of the foregoing nature
was exclusive, but the Act did not affect the jurisdiction previously
possessed by any circuit or district court of the United States over cases
or proceedings of a kind not lying within the above-numerated classes.
The court was abolished Oct. 22, 1913, its jurisdiction transferred to the
district courts and its judges were retained as circuit judges.
Commerce Courts> (See Courts.):
Establishment of, recommended. 7442.
2.a. From 15 C.J.S.
1115 (1995), COMMERCE, § 148(1), fn. 59:
Former statutes; commerce court
(1) Under provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended by the act
of June 29, 1906, equitable jurisdiction to entertain, hear, and determine
suits to annul or to enjoin the enforcement of orders of the Interstate
Commerce Commission was conferred on the then circuit courts of the United
U.S.--Southern R. Co. v. Tift, Ga., 27 S.Ct. 709, 206 U.S. 428, 51 L.Ed.
1124, 11 Ann.Cas. 846. ...
(2) This jurisdiction was subsequently transferred to, and inhered in, the
commerce court, while the act creating that court was in force.
U.S.-- Interstate Commerce Commn. v. Baltimore, etc. R. Co. Com.Ct., 32 S.Ct.
742, 225 U.S. 326, 56 L.Ed. 1107. ...
(3) The commerce court was abolished in 1913 and the powers of the commerce
court were conferred on the specially constituted district court.
U.S.-- Brady v. Interstate Commerce Commisssion, D.C.W.Va., 43 F.2d 847,
affirmed Brady v. U.S., 51 S.Ct. 559, 283 U.S. 804, 75 L.Ed. 1424--Standard
Oil Co. v. U. S. D.C.Ind., 41 F.2d 836, affirmed Standard Oil Co., Indiana
v. U. S., 51 S.Ct. 429, 283 U.S. 235, 75 L.Ed. 999--Chesapeake & O. Ry. Co.
v. U.S. D.C.W.Va., 35 F.2d 769, affirmed 51 S.Ct. 337, 283 U.S. 35, 75 L.Ed.
2.b. From DIGEST UNITED
STATES SUPREME COURT REPORTS Five Year Supp. 1918-1922, p. 353:
1. The Interstate Commerce Commission Act of February 4, 1887 (24 Stat. at
L. 383, chap. 104, Comp. Stat. § 8576, 4 Fed. Stat. Anno. 2d ed. p. 448),
confers upon the Commission powers of investigation in very broad language,
and the Supreme Court has refused by construction to limit it so far as the
business of the carriers is concerned, and their relation to the public.
Smith v. Interstate Commerce Commission, 245 U. S. 33, 38 Sup. Ct. Rep. 30
[,] 62: [L.Ed.] 135
2.c. However, from
U.S.C.A. POPULAR NAME TABLE (2001), p. 859:
ICC Termination Act of
Pub.L. 104-88, Dec. 29, 1995, 109 Stat. 803 (2 § 451: 5 §§ 5314, 5315, 8332
note; 5 App. § 8G; 11 §1162; 15 §§ 18, 21, 26, 1681s, 1691c, 1692l, 5904; 16
§ 1247, 1248, 1261, 1261 note; 18 §§ 33, 921, 1992, 6001; 23 §§ 127, 149; 26
§§ 168, 281, 354, 3231, 7701; 28 §§ 1336, 1337, 1445, 2321, 2323, 2341,
2342;...) 3. From BOUVIER'S LAW DICTIONARY, Baldwin's Students Ed. (1946),
COMMERCIAL LAW. A phrase
employed to denote those branches of the law which relate to the rights of
property and relations of persons engaged in commerce.
This term denotes more than
the phrases "maritime law," which is sometimes used as synonymous, but which
more strictly relates to shipping and its incidents.
As the subjects with which commercial law, even as administered in any one
country, has to deal are dispersed throughout the globe, it results that
commercial law is less local and more cosmopolitan in its character than any
other great branch of municipal law; and the peculiar genius of the common
law, in adapting recognized principles of right to new and ever-varying
combinations of facts, has here found a field where its excellence had been
more clearly shown. The various systems of commercial law have been well
contrasted by Leone Levi in his collection entitled "Commercial Law, its
Principles and Administration, or the Mercantile Law of Great Britain
compared with the Codes and Laws of Commerce of all the Important Mercantile
Countries of the Modern World, and with the Institutes of Justinian;"
London, 1850-52; a work of great interest both as a contribution to the
project of a mercantile code and as a manual of present use.
As to the rule in the
Federal Courts, see 16 Pet. 1; id. 711; 107 U.S. 33, where Bradley, J. says,
"Where the law has not been settled, it is the right and duty of the Federal
Courts to exercise their own judgment, as they also always do in reference
to the doctrines of commercial law." See 12 Am. L. Reg. (N. S.) 473; United
Are you ready to take charge of your life? Click
Here's My Bailout
Internal Revenue Code
Section 6654(e)(2)(c) states:...no tax liability...if....the individual was
a citizen or resident of the United States throughout the preceding taxable
year. IRS contends the success of the SELF-ASSESSMENT system depends on
human rights are natural and cannot be taken away by any legitimate means.
This is the premise of the Declaration of Independence. The United States
Government can only exercise powers given to it by "We the People" through
the U.S. Constitution. The "income
tax" is an INDIRECT TAX. There is no section of law in the Internal
Revenue Code (Title 26 USC) making a CITIZEN or a RESIDENT working and
living WITHIN A STATE OF THE UNION, LIABLE to pay the INCOME
Read about the manipulation
of our money and its supply, the intentional creation of recessions,
depressions and panics, manipulation of the stock markets, and the
demonetization of silver.
Eustace Mullins' carefully
researched and documented treatise picks up from Walbert's expose' and
brings it to the mid 1980's
by Eustace Mullins
How control of the world's money has inexorably led to an ever tighter
grip on control of the world's people.
Brave New World
by Aldous Huxley
Huxley presents a dystopic view of a future
in which mind-control creates a harmonized society stratified into classes
suitably manipulated and deprived to carry out work tasks with a hive
mentality. A foreign element is inserted when a high ranking Alpha brings a
Native American from a Reservation and a new perspective on freedom gnaws at
the fabric of the propaganda matrix.
by Edward Bernays
Lippmann's book, Public Opinion, published in 1922, detailed the
study in which he and Edward Bernays were involved while in London during
the First World War. It had to do with painting pictures inside people's
heads, which were cunningly and deliberately designed by expert craftsmen to
mislead not only individuals but entire societies.
This is the classic expose' of the New World Order from a Commander in
the Canadian Navy through the first half of the 20th Century.
Commander Carr was introduced to the Hidden Hand early in his life and
pursuing its mysteries became a lifelong mission.
by CH Douglas
In every country of the world the global financial system has
repeatedly been brought to the Bar of
Public Opinion as the chief factor in world unrest, and there is little
doubt that the jury of We the People has confirmed the Verdict somewhat rhetorically
expressed by Mr. William Jennings Bryan in his famous election speech: "The
money power preys upon the nation in times of peace, and conspires against
it in times of adversity. It is more despotic than monarchy, more insolent
than autocracy, more selfish than bureaucracy. It denounces, as public
enemies, all who question its methods, or throw light upon its crimes. It
can only be overthrown by the awakened conscience of the nation."
Social Credit by C.H. Douglas can clarify the issues from which we can
move forward to create a financial system that is fair and equitable.
Final Warning: A History of the New World Order
David Allen Rivera has assembled a very carefully written history that
can serve us well. To have been
ignored in the history books, by the colleges and
universities, the print and electronic media, and the entire
national and international discussion shows their power to control
the flow of information as much as they control the flow of money.
What they intend to do with this power and influence should be one
of the most vital topics of conversation.
An Independent Investigation of 9-11 and its Zionist Connection
by Dr. Albert Pastore
provides patterns that we can learn to recognize so that we can avoid
them. Properly presented, history provides any of us with
invaluable tools to help us see behind the illusions. No one who
is paying attention to the patterns and their application to today's
events would fail to miss the signals or the dog that fails to bark.
Uranium Wars by Leuren Moret
How control of the world's people has inexorably led to wider use of
depopulation methods which include spreading radioactivity in food,
water, air, and the human genome.
Taking Back Your Power
by Allen Aslan Heart
WHAT CAN YOU DO? Stop playing THEIR game. Take back
your power. Stop paying taxes that are not legal or lawful. Stop paying
bills you don't really owe. Debt Elimination! Stop using THEIR money. There ARE ways if you
open your mind and look for the gaps in their fences that keep the sheeple
in their pasture. Are you chattel or a real person? You are the one who
makes that choice.
© 2007, Allen Aslan Heart / White Eagle Soaring of the Little Shell Pembina Band, a
Tribe of the Ojibwe Nation