|
Bank Fraud in Australia is Systemic -
part 2 -
part 3
Bank Fraud in Australia Is a Step Toward
Controlling the Economy and the People
Australian Bank Malpractice: Crucifixion and Resurrection
Australian Justice, Court Jesters, and
Constitutional Crisis
Unfinished Business: Searching for a National
Conscience
The Australian Bank Heist Condoned by Reserve Bank
Watchdog
The Foreign Currency Loan Experience in 1980s
Australia: Dwyer v Commonwealth Bank of Australia -
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
Gov Witness Admits in Court Testimony that "Federal
Reserve Note is Not a Dollar"
Unalienable vs Inalienable
Bank Fraud Exposed - Money out of YOUR Pocket!
Paul McLean is Back to Expose Bank Fraud
The Foreign Currency Loan Experience in 1980s
Australia: Dwyer v Commonwealth Bank of Australia -
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
The Quade Appeal on Decision vs CBA
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
-
6
-
7
Jones Letter to CBA Noting Hypocrisy concerning
Dwyer
Dwyer Letter to Kevin Rudd
Bank Fraud in Australia Is a Step Toward
Controlling the Economy and the People
Final Warning: A History of the New World Order
The Cash Cows of Personal Debt
I Want The Earth Plus 5%
-- an
allegory that's not a fairy tale.
Collapse of the Dollar:
How America Was Set Up to Take a Fall
Pycnogenol--the
natural super-antioxidant for relief of most chronic disorders
Seroctin--the
natural serotonin enhancer to reduce stress and depression, and
enjoy better sleep
Plant by Nature is Organic Gardening Nature's Way
Accelerated Mortgage Pay-off can
help you own your home in half to one third the time and save many
thousands of dollars.
Dream Catchers
of the Seventh Fire
A New Beginning: A
Practical Course in Miracles
1 INTRODUCTION
2HISTORY OF COMMERCE
3 RESPONSIBILITY
4 REDEMPTION
5
POWER OF ACCEPTANCE
6
BEING A DIPLOMAT
7
BEING A SOVEREIGN
8
PRIVATE BANKING
Draft Freedom
can mean the difference between life and
deathand show the way to your true and natural freedom.
Child Protection:
How to keep bureaucrats out of family affairs
Drug Smuggling
Is Another Way that the Money Powers Have Profited from Control of
Government
Why Taxes Are Not Necessary
Income Taxes are Cartoon Images of the Law
Hidden Truth about Income Taxes
Stopping an IRS Audit with 32 questions
Social Security Number and W-4
Recording a Notice of Lien as a Lien
Agent Reveals IRS is a Fraud
CAFRs Are the True State of the State, Not Budgets
Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports Expose Fraud 1
Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports Expose Fraud
Behind the Stock Market Illusion is Government
Collusion
Taking Back Your Power
1-Introduction
2-Revolution in Spirit
3-Bank Fraud, Bribery
4-Shadow Government
5-Corporate State
6-Great Depression
7-Court from Common Law
8-Uniform Commercial Code
9-Me and My SHADOW
House of Cards:
Why
home prices are about to plummet--and take the recovery with them.
Geopolitical struggle between the US / UK and the rest of the world is
weakening the US Dollar and portends devaluation and depression soon.
Get gold and silver.
The real war is in the currency markets.
That was why 9-11: to draw America into deficits and war. Get rid of debt.
Get gold and silver.
Your Credit File Rights
For debt elimination to be successful
you must know your rights.
Zombie Debt:
Debt is Hard to Kill
There's a hot new growth
industry: companies that buy ancient bad debts for pennies and squeeze
you to pay. Here's debt elimination ideas how to get them off your
back.
Sleazy
New Debt Collector Tactics
It may not be your debt,
but it could be your problem. Collection agencies are bullying
blameless consumers into paying debts they never owed. Eliminate your
debt and be free.
Debt Collection Practices: When
Hardball Tactics Go Too Far
Dealing with a debt
collector can be one of life's most stressful experiences. Harassing
calls, threats, and use of obscene language can drive you to the edge.
Debt elimination is the solution.
An
Outcry Rises as Debt Collectors Play Rough
The rise in American consumer debt
has been accompanied by a sharp increase in complaints about
aggressive and sometimes unscrupulous tactics by debt collection
agencies, a phenomenon that has government regulators increasingly
concerned. Debt elimination removes any advantage they claim.
Debt Collection Puts on a
Suit
As consumer loans hit an all-time
high, the industry gets more sophisticated. That means that debt
elimination skills must are even more important.
The Constitution of N0
Authority - Lysander Spooner
|
|
1. The True Nature of the
Anne Frank Diary
There is an old riddle about a man walking
along until he comes to a fork in the road. One path leads to Heaven and
the other to Hell, and there is no way of knowing which is which except by
asking at a nearby house. In the house live two identical sisters: one
always lies, the other always tells the truth and, not knowing to which
sister will answer the door, he is only allowed one question. What must he
ask?
The solution to the riddle is to pose the
question "What would your sister say if I asked her which road I should
take?" By this means a single negation is introduced into the reply,
regardless of which sister answers the question; then the opposite path is
taken. However this riddle and its solution is set in a simple, invariant
world where one person always lies and one always tells the truth. Real
life, of course, is not that simple.
Several prominent Revisionists, notably
Faurisson and Harwood, have been convinced that the diary of Annelies
Maria Frank is a forgery and a number of assertions to this effect have
appeared in Revisionist publications. Notwithstanding, these conclusions
were reached before the original manuscript of the Diary was
subjected to a thorough examination by the Dutch Forensic Laboratory, and
it appears that they are mostly wrong. This critique of The Diary of
Anne Frank began because it is important for historical accuracy,
and the perceived legitimacy of other Revisionist claims, that the record
be set straight.
The Anne Frank Diary: The Critical
Edition, published in Dutch in 1986 and in
English in 1989, is a 719-page analysis of the extant diaries of Anne
Frank. This Critical Edition is not really critical, but it
does document every piece of her diary and includes details of its
forensic examination. Following the publication of the complete manuscript
and the forensic results it can no longer seriously be doubted that the
Diary was by Annelies Maria Frank's own hand. The only other
scenario which can be envisaged is that someone (the most likely candidate
being Otto Frank) planned to forge the diary several years in advance,
going to such extreme lengths to establish its authenticity beforehand
that he concocted an assortment of material in his daughter's name before
the diary was started. That material, dating from 1936, was used during
the forensic examination as independent 'standards' to verify the
handwriting in the original manuscript of what is now known as The
Diary of Anne Frank. The standards include cards and letters sent
from Holland to Germany bearing the code-marks of the Nazi postal censor
which are now known to philatelists.
The original manuscript of the Diary
is now in a bank vault, having been left to the Dutch State Institute for
War Documentation (the Rijksinstituut voor Oorlogsdocumentatie, RIOD) by
Otto Frank. The forensic examination which ensued was certainly overdue,
and it is admitted in the Critical Edition that Mr. Frank did
not go out of his way to rebut attacks on the authenticity of the
Diary. His reticence to permit a full examination of the manuscript
was ostensibly to protect certain individuals mentioned in it about whom
personal comments were made, and there are a number of passages in which
Annelies Maria Frank details her early sexual development. Throughout his
life Otto Frank insisted that the Diary contained the
"essence" of his daughter's writing, and it might equally be argued that
the essence of the charge against it - that it is fraudulent - is fair,
because the Diary has been so exceptionally treated that it
becomes debatable whether it is truly a diary at all. First and foremost,
unlike a normal diary, its entries were rewritten up to two years after
they were set down. Secondly, an unquantifiable proportion of its entries
have little or no basis in reality. Here I shall show that the Diary
is not a forgery, but that the fraudulence it contains is due to a
cumulation of distortions started by Anne Frank herself. Indeed it is
proposed that it is worse than a forgery by being a more convincing hoax:
it is an unreliable mixture of fact and fantasy.
Fundamentals
All of the eight Jews who went into hiding
in Prinsengracht 263 on or after 6 July 1942 were émigrés from Germany who
had been declared stateless: the Franks were from Frankfurt-am-Main, the
van Pels family was from Osnabrück and Pfeffer was from Giessen. Like the
majority of German and other European Jews, they had emigrated; Germany's
Jewish population had fallen from 560,000 in 1933 until by the start of
the war in 1939 only 200,000 remained. Holland, which had remained neutral
during WWI, was considered to be safe from encroachment by the Nazis and
its invasion on 10 May 1940 came as a complete surprise.
The following statement may seem facile but
it evidently sometimes needs expressing. War is not nice; it is the most
austere of games and usually results in the violent death, injury,
imprisonment and exodus of large numbers of people. Why then, with a total
death-toll of WWII of around 42 million people, have the writings of Anne
Frank claimed so much attention? The unique feature of Frank's writings
and, discounting unbridled sentimentality, the likely answer to this
question is that only her accounts were revised afterwards.
The Form of the Original Manuscript
The idiosyncracy of Annelies Maria Frank in
alternating between writing in a flowing (cursive) script and sometimes
reverting to child-like single characters (hand printing), upon which some
critics of the Diary have made great play, seems to be a
characteristic displayed by about one in six of her peer group (C. E. p.
105). In the original manuscript the handprinting is most prevalent in the
earlier sections. Cursive writing and hand printing is sometimes combined
on the same page.
|
Table 1. The Form of the Original Text
|
|
|
Part |
Form |
Pages |
When written |
| Version a |
1.
1a.
2.
3.
|
Autograph Album
(Unknown - lost)
Exercise Book
Exercise Book
|
122
203
128
|
12 Jun. 1942 - 5 Dec.
1942
22 Dec. 1943 - 17 Apr. 1944
17 Apr. 1944 - 1 Aug. 1944
|
| Version b |
4 |
Loose Sheets |
324 |
20 May 1944 - 1 Aug. 1944
|
| Tales |
5 |
'Verhaaltjesboek'
|
|
|
The complete manuscript
consists of five extant parts although Part 5 is stories. We might regard
Parts 1-3 as the real diary: this is denoted here, as in the
Critical Edition, as 'Version a.' Part 4, the Loose Sheets and
denoted 'Version b,' comprises the revision which was undertaken by
Annelies Maria Frank herself between 20 May 1944 and 1 August 1944, and
this was the basis for the published Diary.
It becomes clear from a study of the
complete diary that many contemporaneous events mentioned in Version b do
not appear in Version a. It seems likely therefore that Frank either
maintained a separate diary or had access to old newspapers or other
sources when Version b was prepared. It is inconceivable that she failed
to write at all between 6 December 1942 and 21 December 1943, so it seems
certain that at least one part of the original diary manuscript has been
lost.
Passages appended 'omitted' which follow
are those which do not appear in versions of the Anne Frank Diary
other than the Critical Edition.
The True Nature of the
Diary
Anne Frank was inspired to revise her
writings by the words of Bolkestein, the Dutch Minister of Education, Art
and Science in exile, in a BBC Radio broadcast of 28 March 1944. This is
detailed in the diary entry for 29 March 1944 (Version a). On 20 May 1944
(Version a, omitted) the start of her book is recorded. It was to be
called 'Het Achterhuis.'
The following passage near the beginning of
the Diary (20 June 1942, Version b) exemplifies its true
nature:
It's an odd idea for someone like me, to
keep a diary; not only because I have never done so before, but because
it seems to me that neither I - nor for that matter anyone else - will
be interested in the unbosomings of a thirteen-year-old schoolgirl
- because it was actually written within a
few days of 20 May 1944 (at which time Annelies Maria Frank was almost
15). Many other entries for this period are also new in Version b. Only
after 29 March 1944 is the text unrevised. Gerrold van der Stroom, writing
in the Critical Edition, stated that "she changed,
rearranged, sometimes combined entries of various dates, expanded and
abbreviated" (C. E. p. 61). H. J. J. Hardy of the Dutch
Forensic Science Laboratory, again writing in the Critical Edition,
reported that:
Because changes with handwriting
characteristics with time in Part 3 are paralleled by changes in the
loose sheets, the latter, which were written at the same time, can be
dated more closely. It appears that the writer worked more intensely on
the loose sheets, particularly during the period between July 15 and
August 1, 1944. During that period 162 pages were completed, or about 11
pages a day (C. E. p. 159).
Two examples of the nature of Annelies
Maria Frank's first diary and its subsequent revision are given in Table
2. The original entry for 7 January 1944 smacks of wishful thinking, and
is not credible. The second version is revised so that it falls into the
realm of believability. Most of the characters were given pseudonyms in
the published Diary according to a list drawn by Annelies
Maria Frank. A large proportion of what is written is so mundane that it
is unworthy of further comment; passages such as "Title for this chapter:
Ode to my fountain pen" (11 November 1943, Version b) and "When I had to
use the potty I deliberately made a lot of noise in order to put a stop to
his snoring" (8 March 1944, Version a, omitted). Still more is so private
("My vagina is getting wider all the time," 10 October 1942, Version a,
omitted) that it would ordinarily be unworthy of publication. The actual
content would be undeserving of interest had not doctored versions of the
diary sold more than 15 million copies over five decades.
|
Table 2. Two Examples of the Diary's
Revision by Annelies Maria Frank |
|
|
Version a
|
Revised Version b |
| 7 Jan. 1944 |
"I went to the Jewish
Secondary School, almost all the boys in my class were keen on me."
|
"I went to the Jewish
Secondary School. Lots of boys in our class were keen on me."
|
| 12 Jan. 1944 |
"Isn't it odd, Kitty,
that sometimes I look at myself through someone else's eyes? I see
quite keenly then how things are with Anne Frank." |
"I have an odd way of
sometimes, as it were, being able to see myself through someone else's
eyes. Then I view the affairs of a certain Anne Robin at my ease, and
browse through the pages of her life as if she were a stranger."
|
Annelies Maria Frank variously addressed
her diary entries to Conny, Emmy, Jetty, Kitty or Kit, Lou, Marianne,
Phienny and Pop. Most or all of these names derive from a series of story
books for young girls by Cissy van Marxfeldt (C. E. p. 223), but all
entries in the published version are to Kitty. For Frank the diary appears
to have served the simultaneous roles of confidante, confessional, been a
vehicle for her pubescent concerns and fantasies ("Countless admirers and
lovable young men have begged for my favours" 12 March 1944, Version a,
omitted) as well as substituted for the circle of friends from which she
had been separated. This is plain from a number of entries, and several
clearly indicate that her journal (as opposed to the tales) was not
initially intended for publication. Indeed, she asked her protectors
several times for a book with a lock. "Dear Diary, I hope no-one will ever
read you except my dear sweet husband" she wrote in one entry (28
September 1942, Version a, omitted) and, in another, "Dear Kitty... I must
tell someone, and you are the best one to tell, as I know that come what
may you always keep a secret" (6 January 1944, Version a).
In one passage (7 August 1943, Version b,
omitted), duplicated in the 'Verhaaltjesboek' (Tales), "Kitty is the girl
next door" and later, in what is supposed to be reality, the dialogue
became two-way: "Dear Kitty, you asked me what my hobbies and interests
were" (6 April 1944, Version a).
|
Table 3. Some of the Names used in the
Anne Frank Diary |
| Albert Dussel |
Pseudonym for Freidrich 'Fritz'
Pfeffer |
| Anne Robin |
Anne Frank |
| Bep |
Nickname for Elisabeth van
Wijk-Voskuijl |
| Mrs. Beverbruck |
Derogative nickname for Mrs. Auguste
van Pels |
| Boche |
A cat |
| van Daan |
Pseudonym for the van Pels family
|
| Elli |
Nickname for Elisabeth van
Wijk-Voskuijl |
| Gusti |
Nickname for Mrs. Auguste van Pels
|
| Hello |
Nickname for Helmuth Silberberg
|
| Henk |
Pseudonym for Mr. Jan Gies
|
| Kerli |
Nickname for Mrs. Auguste van Pels
|
| Kitty |
The imaginary addressee of the diary.
The names Conny, Emmy, Jetty, Jet, Jettje, Kitty, Kit, Lou, Loutje,
Marianne, Marjan, Phienny, Phien, Pien Pop and Poppie were also used
|
| Koophuis |
Pseudonym for Johannes Kleiman
|
| Kraler |
Pseudonym for Victor Kugler
|
| Lotje |
Nickname for Charlotte Kaletta
|
| Mansa |
Nickname for Mrs. Edith Frank
|
| Miep van Santen |
Pseudonym for Hermine
Gies-Santrouschitz |
| Moortje |
A cat |
| Mouschi |
A cat |
| Petel |
Nickname for Peter van Pels
|
| Pim |
Nickname for Mr. Otto Frank
|
| Putti |
Nickname for Mr. Hermann van Pels
|
| Tommy |
A cat |
| Vossen |
Pseudonym for Mr. Voskuijl
|
The commentators in the Critical
Edition repeatedly remark on the fluency of much of the writing: a
large proportion of it was "penned with great ease," "penned with fluency"
and so forth. It seems that much of the time Frank was writing quickly and
uncritically. Only slightly less objectively we might surmise that Frank
was writing the first thing that came into her head. Half a dozen entries
in the published Diary are taken from the 'Verhaaltjesboek'
and so are particularly indistinguishable from fiction. For Annelies Frank
the boundary between reality and fantasy was blurred, probably especially
so near the end of the period in hiding.
|
Table 4. Chronology Surrounding the
Anne Frank Diary |
| 12 Jun. 1929 |
Annelies Maria Frank born in
Frankfurt, Germany |
| Mar. 1934 |
Frank family finish moving to
Amsterdam |
| 6 Jul. 1942 |
Frank family go into hiding
|
| 16 Nov. 1942 |
Dentist Pfeffer joins group in hiding
|
| 4 Aug. 1944 |
Eight in hiding arrested, sent to
Westerbork |
| 3 Sept. 1944 |
Eight began their deportation to
Auschwitz |
| 5-6 Sept. 1944 |
Eight arrived at Auschwitz
|
| Oct. 1944 |
Annelies Maria Frank and MF moved to
Bergen-Belsen |
| 16 Jan. 1945 |
Peter van Pels transferred from
Auschwitz to Mauthausen |
| 27 Jan. 1945 |
Auschwitz liberated by Russians; Otto
Frank in hospital |
| 5 Mar. 1945 |
Otto Frank began journey back to
Amsterdam |
| 9 Apr. 1945 |
Auguste van Pels arrived at
Theresienstadt |
| 3 Jun. 1945 |
Otto Frank returned to Amsterdam
|
| 3 Apr. 1946 |
Het Parool article by Jan Romein
|
| 1947 |
Publication of Typescript II as
Achterhuis: Dagboekbrieven |
| 1950 |
Publication of Typescript II as
Das Tagebuch |
| 1950 |
Publication of Het Achterhuis
as Le Journal |
| 1951 |
Publication of Diary of a Young
Girl in the UK and US |
| 1957 |
Establishment of the Anne Frank
Foundation |
| 1960 |
Anne Frank House opened as a museum
|
Throughout the Diary there are
references to the need for silence within the annexe and the factory to
which they had access when the staff were absent. (Annelies Maria Frank
refers to "the house" but in fact it was a factory, to which they usually
had unrestricted access during lunchtimes and evenings.) The celebrated
vacuum cleaner was in daily use until it broke down, presumably
permanently this time, on 3 November 1943 (Version b, omitted). In reality
it is likely that the professed need for silence was a device used by the
elders of the household to suppress Annelies Maria Frank's incessant
chatter: at one point she refers to herself in the third person as "Miss
Quack-Quack" (29 September 1942, Version b). Supposedly in trouble at
school for being an "incurable chatterbox" she had to write an essay on
the theme, and "My arguments were that talking is a feminine
characteristic and that I would do my best to keep it under control, but I
should never be cured, for my mother talked as much as I, probably more,
and what can one do about inherited qualities?" (21 June 1942, Version b).
Not only does the following passage
conflict with the supposed need for quiet, it is a striking example of
aberrant behaviour within the annexe:
I have a brand new prescription against
gunfire: during particularly loud bangs hasten to the nearest wooden
stairs, run up and down a few times and make sure that you fall gently
downstairs at least once. What with the scratches and the noise of the
running and falling, you are too busy to listen to the gunfire let alone
worry about it. The writer of these lines has certainly used this ideal
recipe with success! (2 June 1944, Version a, omitted).
It also becomes clear from a study of the
complete diary that many people knew of the existence of the group in
hiding, not least of whom were the vegetable suppliers (29 March 1944,
Version a, omitted). The harbouring of Jews by the Dutch during this
period was commonplace. The 'spy plot' involving Pfeffer detailed in the
entry of 13 November 1942 (Version a, omitted) is ludicrous and plain
childish fantasy, and is yet another passage which does not appear in the
published Diary. On 9 April 1944 (Version a, passage omitted)
Frank inexplicably wrote that fifteen people were hiding in the premises.
That Frank was suffering some form of mental derangement resulting from
her extended confinement within Prinsengracht 263 seems very likely. By 28
January 1944 (Version b) Frank reports that her cohabitants' "imaginations
run away with them," but she evidently excludes herself from this
observation.
Instances where entries were written on
successive pages but with incongruous dates are interspersed throughout
the original manuscript, as are duplicate entries bearing different dates.
Several entries were pasted into the diary at a later date. At least one
entry date was crossed out, rewritten, and then crossed out again. The
Version b entry for 30 October 1943 appears in the published Diary
dated 7 November 1942, and this is one instance of date changing which
cannot be attributed to Annelies Maria Frank herself.
Another example of the latitude Annelies
Maria Frank allowed herself is provided by the entry of 10 November 1942
(Version a). In it she described Peter's birthday two days previously and
the landing of Allied troops in North Africa. In her revised version
however (9 November 1942, Version b) she added comments made in a speech
at the time by Churchill, changed the source of her information ("happened
to hear on the radio" to "Mr. v. P... announced that...") and further
changed the date of her entry to that of the preceding day. This latter
alteration results in the report of Churchill's speech appearing in
The Diary of Anne Frank the day before it was actually made.
After a thorough, critical study of the
Diary, one is struck above all by the extraordinary
slipperiness of it. One cannot say that it is an outright hoax, but
seemingly at every stage in its production creeping distortion and
insidious untruth has been introduced. The corruption is of a nature which
defies description in a few words, and it has taken many hours of patient
research to get to the bottom of it. Those passages which are pure fantasy
were omitted from the published Diary and these were only
revealed with the publication of the complete diaries in the
Critical Edition. Even the translation of the Diary
into English is complaisant: its original title, 'Het Achterhuis,' is
literally 'The Behind House' or 'The Rear Annexe' but this is now
translated as 'The Secret Annexe' (Het Geheim Achterhuis). When Annelies
Maria Frank states in the entry of 29 March 1944 (Version a) that she is
thinking of producing a novel of that name, the Dutch for 'a novel,'
een roman, is suddenly, and incorrectly, translated as "a romance."
In summary, the published Diary of
Anne Frank, covering the period 12 June 1942 to 1 August 1944, was
actually written between 20 May 1944 and 1 August 1944. It consists of a
substantially revised compilation of her earlier diary and was described
by her as a novel.
Reproduced with permission from
www.heretical.com,
where much more information on the Anne Frank's Diary can be
found.
History of Banking Fraud:
The Coming Battle
By M. W. WALBERT
The
Coming Battle documents from Congressional records, newspaper reports
and writings by the founding fathers and others a chronology of events long
forgotten that shaped our fledgling nation from 1776 to 1899. Read about the
manipulation of our money and its supply, the intentional creation of
recessions, depressions and panics, manipulation of the stock markets, and
the demonetization of silver.
Secrets of the Federal Reserve
by Eustace Mullins
Eustace Mullins' carefully
researched and documented treatise picks up from Walbert's expose' of
control of the money supply and the economy and
brings it to the mid 1980's.
The
World Order
by Eustace Mullins
How control of the world's money has inexorably led to an ever tighter
grip on control of the world's people.
Uranium Wars by Leuren Moret
How control of the world's people has inexorably led to wider use of
depopulation methods which include spreading radioactivity in food,
water, air, and the human genome.
Taking Back Your Power
by Allen Aslan Heart
WHAT CAN YOU DO? Stop playing THEIR game.
Take back your power. Stop paying taxes that are not legal or lawful. Stop
paying bills you don't really owe. Stop using THEIR money. There ARE ways if
you open your mind and look for the gaps in their fences that keep the
sheeple in their pasture. Are you chattel or a real person? You are the one
who makes that choice.
|
