WTC
1, the North Tower, was hit directly by what appeared to be a large
commercial passenger jet, ostensibly by American Airlines Flight 11.
After burning for a short time, black smoke continued to pour from
the WTC 1 until it collapsed.
The explanation for the collapse was a jet fuel
fire that burned hot enough (875șC.), long enough to weaken the
steel in the structure (2,000șC). Calculations of the heat value of
jet fuel must include the absorption of that heat by nitrogen and
carbon dioxide in the air, by unburned carbon particles, by concrete
and steel in the building. These taken together show that there is
too little caloric energy in jet fuel and even the contents of the
offices to increase the heat sufficiently to compromise the
integrity of the steel components. This is what is would take to
allow for the first collapse of a steel structure from fire in the
history of the world. Now look at the WTC 1 after the initial fire
died down. Does that look like an inferno? I see perhaps three
scattered fires, a bit of black smoke, no towering inferno.
Now let's look at a close-up of damage to the WTC
1. It might be hot enough for a weenie roast, but not a towering
inferno capable of weakening the integrity of the steel structure.
Do you see the man near the right edge looking out between the
pillars? On the next floor down on the left, do you see the woman
leaning out for a look? Do you think they just walked through a
blazing inferno to get there?

A close-up of these survivors of the crash becomes
a bit poignant. They probably didn't survive to tell about their
experience, though. If it hadn't been for the surprise demolition
that was to occur a few minutes later they could
have
had a marshmallow roast and waited for the imminent rescue. One of
these two has been tentatively identified as Edna Cintron, an
administrative assistant for Marsh & McLennan Edna Cintron was born
on October 14, 1954. She was 46 years old. Born in Puerto Rico, She
was brought to New York by her mother when she was about five. They
were poor. She made it through the 11th grade, but did not graduate
from high school. (Recently, she was going to school to prepare
herself for a GED, a test that is the equivalent of a high school
diploma and is crucial to career advancement.)
William worked as a doorman in an apartment
building on the swanky Upper East Side, five days a week, from 7am
to 3pm. Then, each work day after three, he drove to the Harlem
flower shop they jointly owned, Sweet William's Florist, where he
labored until 8pm. He was at the florist's on Saturdays, and Edna
joined him there often on Sundays.
For Edna Cintron and her husband, William, every
evening fit into a comforting routine. "She had everything prompt,
clean, neat, organized," Mr. Cintron, a 44-year- old doorman, said
of his 46-year-old wife, an administrative assistant for Marsh &
McLennan. "She would come out of work, come home, cook, make sure
that when I would come out of work there was food on the table and
everything. And every night we would have ice cream and we would
watch TV."
That simple routine in their home in East
Elmhurst, Queens, was remarkable, Mr. Cintron said, because they
each had been homeless, and in their 12 years of marriage they had
struggled with his alcoholism. "We started from the bottom," he
said, "and we worked our way all the way up to the top," even
opening a florist business, Sweet William's, in East Harlem.
Mr. Cintron said that his wife had given him the
courage to go to detox and that last January he celebrated 12 years
of sobriety. "She made sure that she kept me in check," he said.
"She made sure that I did the things I was supposed to do. She was a
very, very strong woman because she would put her foot down.
"She was more like a mother to me. She would make
sure that I would eat right and she would make sure that no one
would manipulate me. So she was also my backbone. She made me
strong. She made me who I am today."
Edna Cintron had one more courageous act to her
credit in her abbreviated life. She ventured out to take a look at
the world moments before it came crushing down and in that act
demonstrated for all of us the lie that the WTC's collapsed because
of a blazing inferno.
Edna Cintron was not alone as a courageous victim
of the mass murder that day in the heart of the financial district.
When Chief Palmer radioed from the 78th floor, he could see only two
pockets of fire, and called for a pair of engine companies to fight
them. the impact zone, which ran from the 78th to the 84th floors.
source: Lost Voices of Firefighters, Some on 78th Floor New York
Times, August 4, 2002 By JIM DWYER and FORD FESSENDEN
http://www.mishalov.com/wtc_lostvoicesfiredept.html
One of the first firefighters in the stricken
second tower, Louie Cacchioli, 51, told People Weekly on Sept. 24:
"I was taking firefighters up in the elevator to the 24th floor to
get in position to evacuate workers. On the last trip up a bomb went
off. We think there were bombs set in the building."
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=245
NYC fireman in clip: "As if they had detonated... ...as if they were
planning to take out a building" source: Videos of Eyewitness
Recollections of Collapses Firemen recall "detonations" in South
Tower
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/videos/index.html
In fact, the NYFD had no
problem at all fighting the WTC fires. NYFD Channel 30 Audiotape
(3.6mb wma file) Note: Several portions of the tape have been
classified. This portion lasts from 8:45 AM to 9:58 AM Eastern Time.
The NYFD audiotape reveals that the fires were
under control, not raging infernos that could melt steel. The tape
alone proves that the official story of the WTC collapse is a
complete and total lie. And, the real reason why the rest of the
tape has been classified is because it reveals the obvious truth.
The New York Times --" Nowhere on tape is there any indication that
firefighters had slightest indication that Tower had become unstable
or could fall." --" Fire department tape reveals no awareness of
imminent doom." Why is it that Fire Department experts, on their
walkie-talkies, stated that they got high up in one of the
buildings; that the fire they saw was not that bad; and that other
firemen should bring up hoses because the fire could easily be
brought under control. Yet, shortly after making such a report, the
buildings got pulverized and collapsed all the way down.
Stanley Praimnath of Elmont, Long Island. Stanley
was standing at his desk on the 81st floor of WTC 2 when he saw the
second plane coming apparently directly for his window. He dived
under the desk. It hit somewhere above him, but a flaming wing of
the plane landed in the doorway of his department. He was buried in
debris, and there was no exit. He prayed, found extraordinary
physical strength, broke through a wall with the help of a man with
a flashlight, and made it out of the building
9-11 reinforces beliefs
NYPD returned a packet of family photographs to
Yvonne Barker. Found in her office desk on the 86th floor, they were
unsinged and without a mark.
Find at WTC Brings Joyous Surprise
Brian Clark, a survivor from the 84th floor of WTC
2 said, "You could see through the wall and the cracks and see
flames just, just licking up, not a roaring inferno, just quiet
flames licking up and smoke sort of eking through the wall." [BBC
Horizon] Remember those "heated and deformed bolts," which we're
to believe gave way, almost simultaneously? In chapter two of the
FEMA report, it is revealed that the bolts of the "weakened" floor
beams were lateral (sideways) supports; not vertical. The vertical
support plates (L-shamed "hanger brackets") for the floor joists
were welded!
By inference, we are to believe that the 'corner'
bolts (heavier insulation with greater adhesion) ALL lost their
thermal insulation, that no heat was radiated away by the
steel-on-steel contact and that no significant volume of heat was
ventilated out through the shattered windows - along with all that
smoke. The "manufactured presumption" is that the heat totally
accumulated to produce the cited temperatures - not from burning jet
fuel, per FEMA - but from burning furniture, interior finish
materials and paper! With all that 'contained' heat, the cooler
outer steel walls are supposed to have heated and expanded sideways
- independently of the heated and expanded steel floor joists! -
That's not how fire physics operate.
How Could The Explosives Have Been Placed
Beforehand?
Mr. Sheeple has insisted that it would be
impossible to rig a building before 9-11 without being noticed. Ben
Fountain, a financial analyst who worked in the World Trade Center
Complex, told People Magazine that in the weeks before 9/11 there
were numerous unannounced and unusual drills where sections of both
the twin towers and building 7 were evacuated for 'security
reasons'. This was obviously the perfect opportunity to place those
explosives.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/011904wtc7.html
Larry Silverstein, the lease holder of the WTC7
building admits it was intentionally demolished.
"I remember getting a call from the, er, fire
department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were
gonna be able to contain the fire, and I said, We've had such
terrible loss of life, maybe the smartest thing to do is pull it.
And they made that decision to pull and we watched the building
collapse"
In the PBS documentary, "Rebuilding America, A
Year at Ground Zero," originally aired in Sept. of 2002 a cleanup
worker referred to the demolition of WTC 6; "...well, we're getting
ready to "pull" building six." There can be little doubt as to how
the word "pull" is being used in this context.
Click here to listen to the clip
Do you wonder why they had explosives in place
coincidentally on 9-11? When the Towers were wired with additional
explosives, more than required by the building code? On the weekend
of September 8th/9th, there was a "power down" condition in Tower 2,
because of a supposedly needed "cabling upgrade." This could be when
Tower 2's explosives were placed.
Edna Cintron in her last moments opened many eyes
to the truth about 9-11.
Recovered from The Seventh Fire webmistress who
stole my domain name