|
|
Imagine
that the entire quantity of jet fuel from the aircraft was injected into
just one floor of the World Trade Center, that the jet fuel burnt with the
perfect efficiency, that no hot gases left this floor and that no heat
escaped this floor by conduction. With these ideal assumptions we calculate
the maximum temperature that this one floor could have reached.
"The Boeing 767 is capable of carrying
up to 23,980 gallons of fuel and it is estimated that, at the time of
impact, each aircraft had approximately 10,000 gallons of unused fuel on
board (compiled from Government sources)."
Quote from the FEMA report into the collapse of WTC's One and Two (Chapter
Two).
Since the aircraft were only flying from Boston to Los
Angeles, they would have been nowhere near fully fueled on takeoff (the
aircraft have a maximum range of 7,600 miles). They would have carried just
enough fuel for the trip together with some safety factor. Remember, that
carrying excess fuel means higher fuel bills and less paying passengers. The
aircraft would have also burnt some fuel between Boston and New York.
What we propose to do, is to pretend that the entire
10,000 gallons of jet fuel was injected into just one floor of the World
Trade Center, that the jet fuel burnt with the perfect quantity of oxygen,
that no hot gases left this floor and that no heat escaped this floor by
conduction. With these ideal assumptions (none of which were meet in
reality) we will calculate the maximum temperature that this one floor could
have reached. Of course, on that day, the real temperature rise of any floor
due to the burning jet fuel, would have been considerably lower than the
rise that we calculate, but this estimate will enable us to demonstrate that
the "official" explanations are lies.
Note that a gallon of jet fuel weighs about 3.1 kilograms,
hence 10,000 gallons weighs 10,000 x 3.1 = 31,000 kgs.
Jet fuel is a colorless, combustible, straight run
petroleum distillate liquid. Its principal uses are as an ingredient in lamp
oils, charcoal starter fluids, jet engine fuels and insecticides.
It is also know as, fuel oil #1, kerosene, range oil, coal
oil and aviation fuel.
It is comprised of hydrocarbons with a carbon range of C9
- C17. The hydrocarbons are mainly alkanes CnH2n+2,
with n ranging from 9 to 17.
It has a flash point within the range 42° C - 72° C (110°
F - 162° F).
And an ignition temperature of 210° C (410° F).
Depending on the supply of oxygen, jet fuel burns by one
of three chemical reactions:
(1) CnH2n+2 + (3n+1)/2 O2
=> n CO2 + (n + 1) H2O
(2)
CnH2n+2
+ (2n+1)/2 O2 => n CO + (n + 1) H2O
(3)
CnH2n+2
+ (n+1)/2 O2 => n C + (n + 1) H2O
Reaction (1) only occurs when jet fuel is well mixed with
air before being burnt, as for example, in jet engines.
Reactions (2) and (3) occur when a pool of jet fuel burns.
When reaction (3) occurs the carbon formed shows up as soot in the flame.
This makes the smoke very dark.
In the aircraft crashes at the World Trade Center the
collision would have mixed the fuel with the limited amount of air available
within the building, quite well, but the combustion would still have been
mainly a combination of reactions (2) and (3) as the quantity of oxygen was
quite restricted.
Since we do not know the exact quantities of oxygen
available to the fire, we will assume that the combustion was perfectly
efficient, that is, the entire quantity of jet fuel burnt via reaction (1),
even though we know that this was not so. This generous assumption will give
a temperature that we know will be higher than the actual temperature of the
fire attributable to the jet fuel.
We need to know that the
(net) calorific value of jet fuel when burnt via reaction (1) is 42-44 MJ/kg.
The calorific value of a fuel is the amount of energy released when the fuel
is burnt. We will use the higher value of 44 MJ/kg as this will lead to a
higher maximum temperature than the lower value of 42 (and we wish to
continue being outrageously generous in our assumptions).
For a cleaner presentation and simpler calculations we
will also assume that our hydrocarbons are of the form CnH2n.
The dropping of the 2 hydrogen atoms does not make much difference to the
final result and the interested reader can easily recalculate the figures
for a slightly more accurate result. So we are now assuming the equation:
(4)
CnH2n
+ 3n/2 O2 => n CO2 + n H2O
However, this model, does not take into account that the
reaction is proceeding in air, which is only partly oxygen.
Dry air is 79% nitrogen and 21% oxygen (by volume). Normal
air has a moisture content from 0 to 4%. We will include the water vapor and
the other minor atmospheric gases with the nitrogen.
So the ratio of the main atmospheric gases, oxygen and
nitrogen, is 1 : 3.76. In molar terms:
Air = O2 + 3.76 N2.
Because oxygen comes mixed with nitrogen, we have to
include it in the equations. Even though it does not react, it is "along for
the ride" and will absorb heat, affecting the overall heat balance. Thus we
need to use the equation:
(5)
CnH2n
+ 3n/2(O2 + 3.76 N2) => n CO2 + n H2O
+ 5.64n N2
From this equation we see that the molar
ratio of CnH2n to that of the products is:
| CnH2n : CO2
: H2O : N2 |
= 1 : n : n : 5.64n moles |
| |
= 14n : 44n : 18n : 28 x 5.64n kgs |
| |
= 1 : 3.14286 : 1.28571 : 11.28 kgs |
| |
= 31,000 : 97,429 : 39,857 :
349,680 kgs |
In the conversion of moles to kilograms we have assumed
the atomic weights of hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen and oxygen are 1, 12, 14
and 16 respectively.
Now each of the towers contained 96,000 (short) tons of
steel. That is an average of 96,000/117 = 820 tons per floor. Lets suppose
that the bottom floors contained roughly twice the amount of steel of the
upper floors (since the lower floors had to carry more weight). So we
estimate that the lower floors contained about 1,100 tons of steel and the
upper floors about 550 tons = 550 x 907.2 ? 500,000 kgs. We will assume that
the floors hit by the aircraft contained the lower estimate of 500,000 kgs
of steel. This generously underestimates the quantity of steel in these
floors, and once again leads to a higher estimate of the maximum
temperature.
Each story had a floor slab and a ceiling slab. These
slabs were 207 feet wide, 207 feet deep and 4 (in parts 5) inches thick and
were constructed from lightweight concrete. So each slab contained 207 x 207
x 1/3 = 14,283 cubic feet of concrete. Now a cubic foot of lightweight
concrete weighs 50kg, hence each slab weighed 714,150 ? 700,000 kgs.
Together, the floor and ceiling slabs weighed some 1,400,000 kgs.
So, now we take all the ingredients and estimate a maximum
temperature to which they could have been heated by 10,000 gallons of jet
fuel. We will call this maximum temperature T. Since the calorific value of
jet fuel is 44 MJ/kg. We know that 10,000 gallons = 31,000 kgs of jet fuel
will release 31,000 x 44,000,000 = 1,364,000,000,000 Joules of energy.
This is the total quantity of energy available to heat the
ingredients to the temperature T. But what is the temperature T? To find
out, we first have to calculate the amount of energy absorbed by each of the
ingredients.
That is, we need to calculate the energy needed to raise:
| 39,857 |
kilograms of water
vapor to the temperature T° C, |
| 97,429 |
kilograms of carbon
dioxide to the temperature T° C, |
| 349,680 |
kilograms of nitrogen
to the temperature T° C, |
| 500,000 |
kilograms of steel to
the temperature T° C, |
| 1,400,000
|
kilograms of concrete
to the temperature T° C. |
To calculate the energy needed to heat the above
quantities, we need their
specific heats. The
specific heat of a substance is the amount of energy needed to raise one
kilogram of the substance by one degree centigrade.
|
Substance |
Specific Heat [J/kg*C] |
| Concrete |
3,300 |
| Steel |
450 |
| Nitrogen |
1,038 |
| Water Vapor |
1,690 |
| Carbon Dioxide |
845 |
Substituting these values into the above, we obtain:
| 39,857 x |
1,690 x (T - 25) |
Joules are needed to heat the water
vapor from 25° to T° C, |
| 97,429 x |
845 x (T - 25) |
Joules are needed to heat the carbon
dioxide from 25° to T° C, |
| 349,680 x |
1,038 x (T - 25) |
Joules are needed to heat the
nitrogen from 25° to T° C, |
| 500,000 x |
450 x (T - 25) |
Joules are needed to heat the steel
from 25° to T° C, |
| 1,400,000 x |
3,300 x (T - 25) |
Joules are needed to heat the
concrete from 25° to T° C. |
The assumption that the specific heats are constant over
the temperature range 25° - T° C, is a good approximation if T turns out to
be relatively small (as it does). For larger values of T this assumption
once again leads to a higher maximum temperature (as the specific heat for
these substances increases with temperature). We have assumed the initial
temperature of the surroundings to be 25° C. The quantity, (T - 25)° C, is
the temperature rise.
So the amount of energy needed to raise one floor to the
temperature T° C is
= (39,857 x 1,690 + 97,429 x 845 + 349,680 x 1,038 +
500,000 x 450 + 1,400,000 x 3,300) x (T - 25)
= (67,358,300 + 82,327,500 + 362,968,000 + 225,000,000 + 4,620,000,000) x (T
- 25) Joules
= 5,357,650,000 x (T - 25) Joules.
Since the amount of energy available to heat this floor is
1,364,000,000,000 Joules, we have that
5,357,650,000 x (T - 25) = 1,364,000,000,000
5,357,650,000 x T - 133,941,000,000 = 1,364,000,000,000
Therefore T = (1,364,000,000,000 +
133,941,000,000)/5,357,650,000 = 280° C (536° F).
So, if we assume a typical office fire at the WTC, then
the jet fuel could have only added 280 - 25 = 255° C (at the very most) to
the temperature of the fire.
Summarizing:
We have assumed that the entire quantity of jet fuel from
the aircraft was injected into just one floor of the World Trade Center,
that the jet fuel burnt with the perfect efficiency, that no hot gases left
this floor and that no heat escaped this floor by conduction.
We have found that it is impossible the jet fuel, by
itself, raised the temperature of this floor beyond 280° C (536° F).
Now this temperature is nowhere near high enough to even begin explaining
the World Trade Center Tower collapse.
It is not even close to the first critical temperature of
600° C (1,100° F) where steel loses about half its strength and it is
nowhere near the quotes of 1500° C that we constantly read about in our
lying media.
"In the mid-1990s British Steel and the Building Research
Establishment performed a series of six experiments at Cardington to
investigate the behavior of steel frame buildings. These experiments were
conducted in a simulated, eight-story building. Secondary steel beams were
not protected. Despite the temperature of the steel beams reaching 800-900°
C (1,500-1,700° F) in three of the tests (well above the traditionally
assumed critical temperature of 600° C (1,100° F), no collapse was observed
in any of the six experiments."
Recovered from The Seventh Fire
webmistress who stole my domain name

History of Banking Fraud:
The Coming Battle
By M. W. WALBERT
The
Coming Battle documents from Congressional records, newspaper reports
and writings by the founding fathers and others a chronology of events long
forgotten that shaped our fledgling nation from 1776 to 1899. Read about the
manipulation of our money and its supply, the intentional creation of
recessions, depressions and panics, manipulation of the stock markets, and
the demonetization of silver.
Secrets of the Federal Reserve
by Eustace Mullins
Eustace Mullins' carefully
researched and documented treatise picks up from Walbert's expose' of
control of the money supply and the economy and
brings it to the mid 1980's.
The
World Order
by Eustace Mullins
How control of the world's money has inexorably led to an ever tighter
grip on control of the world's people.
Uranium Wars by Leuren Moret
How control of the world's people has inexorably led to wider use of
depopulation methods which include spreading radioactivity in food,
water, air, and the human genome.
Taking Back Your Power
by Allen Aslan Heart
WHAT CAN YOU DO? Stop playing THEIR game.
Take back your power. Stop paying taxes that are not legal or lawful. Stop
paying bills you don't really owe. Stop using THEIR money. There ARE ways if
you open your mind and look for the gaps in their fences that keep the
sheeple in their pasture. Are you chattel or a real person? You are the one
who makes that choice.
|