Framing bin Laden for 9-11

The Afghanistan ambush of the Soviet Imperialist helped bring down the "communist" experiment in the USSR. Al-Qaeda became an asset of US covert wars, especially in the Balkans.

How things SEEM to have changed since then.

Within minutes after the attack, a parade of politicians and "terrorism experts" appeared on every TV channel all claiming that the attacks were the work of Osama bin Laden. The Bush administration claimed that it had evidence linking bin Laden to the attacks which it would release to the public in a matter of days. They never did. Just like they never provided any evidence that he blew up the US embassies in Africa in 1997. The entire case against Osama bin Laden was based on nothing but the repeated claim that he was the culprit for the embassy bombings and for 9-11. Demands were placed upon the Taliban government of Afghanistan turn bin Laden over to the US or face an attack (we established earlier that US military action had already been planned since June). India Reacts. India in anti-Taliban military plan. Mae Brussell, June 21, 2001. Jane's International Security News. (England) India joins anti-Taliban coalition. By Rahul Bedi. March 15, 2001

The Taliban offered to turn bin Laden over to a neutral party if the US provided any evidence to them that he had anything to do with the 1997 US African embassy bombings or the 9-11 attacks. The evidence was never presented to the Taliban for two reasons:

1. There was never any evidence, not even circumstantial
2. The war to replace the Taliban with a US puppet government was already in motion. The 9-11 attacks served as the perfect excuse, the "incident" to win the support of the American people and kick off the war.

Three months after the attacks and with the bombing of Afghani peasants in full swing, the US had still not provided one shred of evidence to link bin Laden and his Al Qaeda "network" to 9-11. People in foreign countries were beginning to ask questions. Then one day, the Pentagon claimed that some unnamed source found a video tape in Afghanistan. The Bush gang began dropping hints in the media that this video shows Osama bin Laden bragging and admitting his role in the attacks. How convenient! And how improbable. The "mastermind" of 9-11, who was so brilliant that he pulled off 9-11 without being detected, was careless enough to leave a "confession video" laying around to be discovered by the US!

The video was shown on the news with English subtitles. "Bin Laden's" voice was so barely audible that even viewers in Arab nations had to rely on the Pentagon's translated subtitles! An obedient American news media accepted the Pentagon story and translation without question. A few Arab media whores were even trotted out to vouch for the tape's authenticity. Aha! This is the "smoking gun" they assured us. But this too is another vicious lie.

On December 20, 2001, the German TV show Monitor (the "60 Minutes of Germany") found the translation of the "confession" video to be not only "inaccurate", but even "manipulative". Dr. Abdel El M. Husseini and Professor Gernot Rotter made an independent translation and accused the White House translators of "writing a lot of things that they wanted to hear but cannot be heard on the tape no matter how many times you listen to it." Der Erste.(Germany) Monitor. Aired December 20, 2001. Translated by Craig Morris on Rense

Even more compelling than the revelations of the European press are the actual images of the "confession video". Every photo previously taken of Osama Bin laden shows gaunt facial features and a long thin nose. The Pentagon video of Bin Laden clearly shows a man with full facial features and a wide nose. Examine the pictures side-by-side for yourself if you don't believe it. The differences in facial features will jump right out at you.

Would the Pentagon leadership be capable of such deception? Why not?! They were capable of participating in 9-11 weren't they? The Pentagon itself has even admitted the existence of a special department established for the purpose of planting false stories in the media in order to carry out strategic objectives. The New York Times broke a story in February 2002 which revealed that the Pentagon has plans to deliberately provide false stories to the press as part of an effort to influence policy. The Pentagon set up the Office of Strategic Influence (OSI) for this purpose. Air Force General named Simon P. Worden was chosen to head this criminal effort. The New York Times. Pentagon Considers Using Lies. By James Dao & Eric Schmitt. February 18,2001 http://www.atimes.com/terror/DB22Dk02.html Worden's boss is Douglass Feith, a dedicated Zionist who serves as Undersecretary of Defense for Policy. How dedicated a Zionist is Feith? The Zionist Organization of America (ZOA) honored Feith and his father at an award dinner in 1999. So I'll let ZOA's 1997 press release tell you about Feith:

"This year's honorees will be Dalck Feith and Douglas J. Feith, the noted Jewish philanthropists and pro-Israel activists. Dalck Feith will receive the ZOA's special Centennial Award at the dinner, for his lifetime of service to Israel and the Jewish people. His son Douglas J. Feith, the former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense, will receive the prestigious Louis D. Brandeis Award at the dinner." Zionist Organization of America Press Release. October 13, 1997

Then check out the smirk. Whose hand is in the cookie jar?

There you have it! The Zionist Air Force General who runs the Pentagon's media disinformation department, reports directly to a Zionist Pentagon boss who was a recipient of the "prestigious" Louis Brandeis Award. Brandeis, a former Supreme Court judge, was one of the key Zionist powerbrokers who helped influence Woodrow Wilson into joining World War I as part of the Zionist-British Balfour deal we learned about earlier.

Nearly two years have passed since the 9-11 attacks and the FBI has not uncovered any Al Qaeda cells in the United States nor has it found any paper trail. The London Times reported:

"Thousands of FBI agents have rounded up more than 1,300 suspects across America since September 11, but they have failed to find a single Al-Qaeda cell operating in the United States...Tom Ridge, Director of Homeland Security could not explain why none had been caught."

In April of 2002, FBI director Robert Mueller - the same Robert Mueller who admitted that several hijacker identities were in doubt due to identity thefts- made this stunning announcement:

"In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper - either here or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere - that mentioned any aspect of the September 11 plot." http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald/3163998.htm

Predictably, Directors Ridge and Mueller attribute this total lack of any evidence to the skill of the Al - Qaeda "terrorist network". If you've read this far you should know better. The reason that the US has been unable to uncover a shred of evidence to link Al Qaeda to 9-11 is because....al Qaeda didn't do it!  Download a NOT WANTED FOR 9-11 poster of Osama bin Laden.

On January 16, 2010 the FBI posted a "new" photo for Osama bin Laden, this time charging him with the September 11, 2001 attack. They used a photo of a Spanish legislatorfrom the Internet to approximate what Osama might look like after more than 10 years. So the FBI "expert" took an image from the Internet, photoshopped it to create their "new" composite analysis, and surprised Senor Llamazares.

Speaking at a news conference he said he would no longer feel safe traveling to the United States after his hair and facial wrinkles were taken from the Internet and appeared on a wanted poster updating the U.S. government's 1998 photo of the al-Qaida leader. "I was surprised and angered because it's the most shameless use of a real person to make up the image of a terrorist," Llamazares said at a news conference Saturday. "It's almost like out of a comedy if it didn't deal with matters as serious as bin Laden and citizens' security."

The FBI said in a statement Saturday that it was aware of the similarities between their age-progressed image "and that of an existing photograph of a Spanish public official." "The forensic artist was unable to find suitable features among the reference photographs and obtained those features, in part, from a photograph he found on the Internet," the statement sent to The Associated Press said.

"I have no similarity, physically or ideologically, to the terrorist bin Laden," he said.

Then AP joined in the propaganda by their next statement:

They do share one characteristic — both are 52.

This is an example of a limited hangout used by propaganda maestros to maintain the programming by seeming to reveal something crucial but inserting another lie as part of the "truth-telling". Osama bin Laden had died in December 2001 of complications from kidney failure according to an Egyptian newspaper report. Months prior to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto in December 2007, she had said in an televised interview with David Frost that one of the possible people who might be suspected of her death should she be assassinated had "murdered Osama bin Laden".

Continuing the party line the AP then reported:

Bin Laden is believed to be hiding in the lawless Pakistan frontier bordering Afghanistan. His exact whereabouts have been unknown since late 2001, when he and some bodyguards slipped out of the Tora Bora mountains, evading air strikes, U.S. special forces and Afghan militias.

This is propaganda, maintained to keep the wars going, continue the killing, decimating innocent populations, destroying cultures, and serving the shadow elite who benefit by the suffering and death of people they term, "useless eaters."

Dr. Albert Pastore has assembled an extensive and very persuasive report on the probable role of Mossad and Zionist collaborators within the US Government in organizing and implementing a simulated "terrorist" attack that could be blamed upon Arabs and Islamic fundamentalists. If you approach this possibility with a critical and open mind you might find it very powerful and plausible. I did. It is well researched and supported with 191 citations from around the world. Read the rest of the book An Independent Investigation of 9-11 and its Zionist Connection

See also: