US support for Israel, when considered not in abstract but in concrete detail, cannot be adequately explained only as a result of American imperial interests. The strong influence wielded by the organized Jewish community in the USA in support of all Israeli policies must also be taken into account in order to explain the Middle East policies of American administrations.... It should be recalled that Judaism, especially in its classical form, is totalitarian in nature. The behavior of supporters of other totalitarian ideologies of our times was not different from that of organized American Jews....

Any support of human rights in general by a Jew which does not include support of human rights of non-Jews whose rights are being violated by the 'Jewish State' is as deceitful as the support of human rights by a Stalinist. 11 Shahak concludes his monumental work by stating:

The real test facing both Israeli and Diaspora Jews is the test of their self-criticism which must include the critique of the Jewish past.... The extent of the persecution and discrimination against non-Jews inflicted by the 'Jewishized' Diaspora Jews is also enormously greater than the suffering inflicted on Jews by regimes hostile to them.

The quadripartite countries involved in the Mideast takeover (the US, the USSR, Britain and Israel) continue to use destabilization as a principal weapon. It has destroyed the once- beautiful city of Beirut, known as the "Paris of the Mideast"; the most advanced country, Iraq; and wreaked havoc on the country with the highest per capita income, Kuwait.

The culprit has been and continues to be International Zionism wedded to Fabian Socialism - both with direct ties to Soviet Bolshevism.

Zionism was established as a world political force in 1897 in Basel, Switzerland. Its aims since then have been centered on setting up a one-world government with Zionism in control of worldwide finance and therefore "Lord of the World. " Knupffer points out in The Struggle for World Power that the driving force is "Messianic Finance Capitalism that actually brought about Soviet Bolshevism. "

A quote from Edward Gibbon's Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire is pertinent:

"The enslavement of man usually begins in the economic sphere. "

Dr. Theodor Herzl, the father of Zionism, stated in a proposal to the Rothschild family council in 1881:

"We are a people - one people. When we sink, we become a revolutionary proletariat, the subordinate officers of the revolutionary party; when we rise there rises also our terrible power of the purse. " 12

Bolshevist Zionism is but one of two heads. The other - Anglo-Saxon - is Fabian Socialism. The victims - those who are mauled and devoured by this monster - are both gentile and Jew, that make up the patriotic and freedom-loving peoples of America, England, Israel, Russia, and, in fact, of the world over. This is not a religious issue, but one of power politics which is built on the foundation of money monopoly, coupled to monopoly of the media for monetary and mind control. Ask yourself a simple question: who - or what group - controls both money and the media, as well as other levers of power, in the United States?

That's what it's all about. It doesn't matter who is backing whom in the Mideast or other regions around the world; the end result, after destabilizing the region, is control of the resources and the real estate, especially the choke points. We saw this so clearly when we dispatched our troops into Somalia in 1993. Check your world atlas, and notice that Somalia and its tiny neighboring country of Djibouti are separated from the Arabian Peninsula by the strategically vital strait of Bab el Mandeb. Another critical choke point which the US and Britain control with carrier task forces is the Strait of Hormuz, separating the Persian Gulf from the Gulf of Oman. In fact, we have had a naval task force stationed at Bahrain, off the north coast of Saudi Arabia, since 1973. The choke point most threatening to the US is that of the Panama Canal. Under a Panamanian 50-year lease beginning on January 1, 2000, China took possession of the ports of Cristobal on the Atlantic and Balboa on the Pacific. "Doomsday" proclaims Admiral Thomas H. Moorer, former Joint Chief of Staff, now retired. "The Chinese are in a position today to... use Panama as a launching point for missiles to attack the US. "

BEATING THE KETTLE DRUMS OF WAR

In a Time magazine report, "As Washington Burns... " (9 Feb 1998), Bruce Nelan writes about Secretary of State Madeleine Albright's trip to Europe and the Mideast to seek "allied" support in the bombing - one more time - of the Islamic country of Iraq, and to persuade Saudi Arabia and Bahrain to allow US planes based there to take part in any anti-Saddam offensive. "So far, " Nelan says, "only Britain, which has sent an aircraft carrier task force to the Gulf, stands firmly with the US on the use of force. " 13

Nelan explains that the US has plenty of land and carrier based planes and missiles in the Gulf to give Saddam's military a pounding. He continues, "But such attacks would not wipe out all of Iraq's hidden poisons and gases, because the US does not know where they are. "

Therein is the heart of the dilemma; we have had UN inspection teams combing the backwaters of Iraq for over seven years looking for what Madeleine and others call "weapons of mass destruction. " These teams have found nothing even remotely resembling "weapons of mass destruction"; no rockets, no poisons, no gases, no nothing... zip... zilch... still we look - and demand the right to continue to look. Saddam, in effect, has said, "enough is enough" and balked at further checking. Even the so-called leaders of the Grand Old Party in Congress shook the mailed fist, wanting to go in and kill somebody, if not Saddam himself, then his Republican Guard; if not the Iraqi military, then the civilians, including women, children and suckling babes. As Sen John McCain pontificated: "If we can take him [Saddam] out, clearly we want to take him out. That's far different from assassination. "14

Yes, far different. In fact, it would be mass murder. President George Bush performed similar surgery on Iraqi women, children and suckling babes in 1991 during Desert Storm. Our public loved it, by jingo!

In his article Nelan stated that Clinton has a double standard:

He relentlessly pursues Saddam's weapons of mass destruction while saying nothing about the atom bombs everyone assumes Israel has stashed in its basement.

This is a courageous statement on Nelan's part, albeit an understatement. As Seymour Hersh revealed in his book, The Samson Option, Israel has stockpiled weapons of mass destruction in underground caverns in the Negev Desert for at least 30 years; weapons equipped with not only nuclear, but chemical and bacteriological warheads, all ready to go.

Do they have the will or power actually to use these weapons? Perhaps they already have. There is the danger, however - certainly recognized by Hersh - that they, like Samson, could pull the temple down upon themselves. In order to grasp this concept fully, we must turn once more to Israel Shahak's monumental work, Jewish History, Jewish Religion. Shahak, who arrived in Palestine in 1945, became an admirer of David Ben-Gurion. He explains how he became his dedicated opponent:

In 1956, I eagerly swallowed all of Ben-Gurion's political and military reasons for Israel initiating the Suez War, until he (in spite of being an atheist, proud of his disregard of the commandments of Jewish religion) pronounced in the Knesset on the third day of the war, that the real reason for it is 'the restoration of the kingdom of David and Solomon' to its Biblical borders. 15

Shahak defines those borders as being all of Sinai and a part of northern Egypt; all of Jordan and a large chunk of Saudi Arabia; all of Kuwait and a part of Iraq south of the Euphrates; all of Lebanon and all of Syria; together with a huge part of Turkey; and the island of Cyprus.

Is this vast territory still the ultimate goal of Israeli expansionism? Shahak further states that in May 1993 Ariel Sharon formally proposed in the Likkud Convention that Israel should adopt the Biblical borders concept as its official policy. Shahak sees the alternatives that face Israeli-Jewish society:

It can become a fully closed and warlike ghetto, a Jewish Sparta, supported by the labour of Arab helots, kept in existence by its influence on the US political establishment and by threats to use its nuclear power, or it can become an open society.

The second choice is dependent on an honest examination of its Jewish past, or the admission that Jewish chauvinism and exclusivism exist, and on an honest examination of the attitudes of Judaism towards the non-Jews. 16

BARBARIANS INSIDE THE GATES

In a sidebar, also in Time (9 Feb 1998), Lisa Beyer writes under a banner "Getting Ready for War" that Israel has developed plans for battling the Palestinians anew, including one code-named Field of Thorns, which calls for the retaking of the West Bank cities:

Both sides know two things in advance of another fight: Israel will win it, and it will be horribly painful. 'It'll be much bigger than last September, ' says an Israeli commander. 'Much crueler, much bloodier, much more complicated'. 17

Therein, in that succinct statement, is the heart of the troubles and misery of "civilization" over the past 3,000 years, all perpetrated by a biblical band of outcasts which history records as the tribes of Judah and Benjamin with their maniacal thirst for destruction and revenge forever.

A prolific American writer, Robert Kaplan, whose prose appears in the liberal Atlantic Monthly as well as the conservative Wall Street Journal, produced a superlative book in 1996, The Ends of the Earth, in which he argues that "democracy" is the source of many problems affecting third world nations. Kaplan claims that "the barbarians are not only at the gates, but may already be inside the gates in the shape and form of faceless gigantic multi-national corporations. "18

The shape and form of the Barbarians Inside the Gates is actually that of a bicephalous monster - two heads, one body. Far from being faceless, it is in fact two-faced, one being branded "Zionist Bolshevism, " the other, "Fabian Socialism. "

This then is the Barbarian Inside the Gates. Has he in fact taken over?

HAS THERE BEEN A DE FACTO COUP?

Edward Luttwak, formerly a student at the London School of Economics, published Coup d'Etat - A Practical Handbook, first in England in 1968 and later by the Harvard University Press (1979). This work has since been published in all major languages and received wide distribution about the globe. The Times Literary Supplement stated that Coup d'Etat was "an extraordinarily competent and well-written work, displaying very wide knowledge of the ways in which coups, both successful and unsuccessful, have actually been organized. "

Writing the foreword for this amazing piece, Walter Laqueur stated:

Once upon a time the commander of a tank brigade in a Middle Eastern country was at least a potential contender for political power. This is no longer so, partly as a result of centralization in military command, partly because the political police have become more effective. But if in these parts coups have become less frequent they are still the only form of political change that can be envisaged at the present time. 19

Which brings us to the here and now, not only in the Middle East, but especially here in the United States. We must ask the question: Have the Barbarians already pulled off a de facto coup?

Here is a most pertinent passage from Luttwak's Coup d'Etat:

If we were revolutionaries, wanting to change the structure of society, our aim would be to destroy the power of some of the political forces, and the long and often bloody process of revolutionary attrition can achieve this. Our purpose, however, is quite different: we want to seize power within the present system, and we shall only stay in power if we embody some new status quo supported by those very forces which a revolution may seek to destroy. Should we want to achieve fundamental social change we can do so after we have become the government. This perhaps is a more efficient method (and certainly a less painful one) than that of the classic revolution.

Though we will try to avoid all conflict with the political forces, some of them will almost certainly oppose a coup. But this opposition will largely subside when we have substituted our new status quo for the old one, and can enforce it by our control of the state bureaucracy and security forces. This period of transition, which comes after we have emerged into the open and before we are vested with the authority of the state, is the most critical phase of the coup. We shall then be carrying out the dual task of imposing our control on the machinery of state, while at the same time using it to impose our control on the country at large. Any resistance to the coup in the one will stimulate further resistance in the other; if a chain reaction develops the coup could be defeated. 20

Our major point to ponder as we go through Barbarians Inside the Gates is that if a de facto coup has already taken place, then, in order to avoid a bloody revolution for change, a counter-coup may be necessary in order to restore the machinery of state and gain control once more of the critical levers of power.

Think about it seriously, for time is fast running out.

LAUNCHING A MILITARY OPERATION

It is always wise before launching a military operation to review where you have been in a particular campaign. Here, briefly, is a "thumbnail sketch" of certain momentous events we will enlarge upon in the following chapters of Barbarians Inside the Gates.

There were two gigantic propaganda campaigns launched in 1945; one was designed to make the people throughout the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom aware of something called "anti-Semitism. " The other, closely related to the first, was to seek the sympathy of these peoples for the Nazi crime of "Jewish extermination. " The staging of the Nuremburg Trials was the instrument used to accomplish both.

Each of these campaigns was based on a colossal blitz of such astounding proportions that, had it been any other group in the world, save Talmudic Zionism, each of these hoaxes would have been laughed out of existence.

These events of 1945 are now culminating in the ongoing campaign, which is really the third and final phase of world conquest on the part of Talmudic Zionism wedded to Fabian Socialism. At this writing, we have the major effort concentrated in three geographic areas and centered in Russia, Israel and the United States. This in fact is a major military operation, with command headquarters occupying two principal locations - New York City and Washington, DC.

The groundwork was laid by the mathematical manipulation of the election process in order to place Bill Clinton in the White House by setting up a "three-way" race. An identical ploy was used to get the Princeton Professor, Woodrow Wilson, in as the first Bolshevik "premier-dictator" in 1912.

Wilson was maneuvered and manipulated on a daily basis, from 1911 until his death, by Edward Mandell House (Huis), Bernard Baruch, Louis Brandeis, Chaim Weizmann, Stephen Weiss, Jacob Schiff and Paul Warburg. The go-between for most of the political intrigue was House's brother-in-law, Sidney Mezes, who worked with Theodor Marburg of Baltimore, Maryland on the details of a "League to Enforce Peace. "

The goal (Phase One) was three-fold, all predicated on a world war: (1) to destroy the Russian monarchy and Christianity in Russia; (2) to establish a "world government"; and (3) to lay the groundwork for the establishment of a Jewish "homeland" in Palestine.

The goal of Phase Two (World War II) was also three-fold: (1) to occupy Palestine; (2) to set up the "United Nations"; (3) to spread "Communism" throughout Eastern Europe.

The financial/political operations center shifted from Europe to the United States during and after Phase One. A quadrilateral of "premier-dictators" was chosen to bring the goals of Phase Two to fruition: Franklin Roosevelt, Winston Churchill, Adolf Hitler and Josef Stalin. The "advisers" shifted somewhat, with the "elder statesman, " Bernard Baruch, playing the lead and supported by Herbert Lehman, Felix Frankfurter, Samuel Rosenmann, and James Warburg.

As was the case during Phase One, the "advisers" were actually running the government of the United States, but in concert with the Supreme Soviet and the Fabian Socialists in Britain. This "orchestration" continued after World War II and was enlarged by bringing in the newly created Jewish "Nation of Israel. " Thereafter, by shifting crises and chaos from the Middle East to Eastern Europe at will over the next four decades; i. e., playing "Zionism" against "Bolshevism, " the "elder statesmen" created confusion, economic instability and political unreliability in the countries of Europe and especially in the United States.