If you thought that the term, "New World Order", came from the fantasies
of "conspiracy theorists," be ready to be surprised. Some folks seem to
think that a global government is what the world needs to obtain peace. Of
course, it really depends upon how you define "peace". How the super-rich
see "peace" can be different from how you and I might see "peace." For them,
peace is being able to play on the planet without losing their piece
of it. Total control is their only way ensure peace and their piece
of the planet, and for some of them they can never get enough of what they
"need."
Globalists are beginning to talk about it openly. They must think that
they are getting close enough to their goal that they can begin to talk
about their victory. Rachman almost boasts when he writes, "... it seems,
everything is in place. For the first time since homo sapiens began to
doodle on cave walls, there is an argument, an opportunity and a means to
make serious steps towards a world government.
Many people on the planet are looking forward to a time when there could
be no wars since there would be only one military establishment. How many
times have you heard a peace activist long for a time when there would be no
more wars? Many activists wish that the UN would be able to step in and put
down violence...of course with force and more violence. Too many have
thought that there could be a war to end all wars. Americans got stuck on
that bayonet in World War I when Woodrow Wilson made his famous
proclamation. Then WWII came to be seen as "The Good War" even though we
supposedly did something really good by bombing innocent civilians in
Dresden, Hamburg, all across Europe, Tokyo, Nagasaki, Hiroshima. Over 58
million people died and the UN was formed to create a united front against
evil straw men.
Did war end? Did evil disappear? Wars can never bring peace. How you
bring about peace is embedded in the means used to do so. Mahatma Gandhi had
said, "The means ARE the ends, in embryo." It's not just that the ends do
not justify the means; the truth is that the means create the ends
just as the ingredients of the soup make the end result.
The New World Order has been mentioned by name by many public leaders
recently including Pope Benedict, Gordon Brown, and now...an
editorial in the Financial Times. Paul Joseph Watson of
PrisonPlanet
sends out an alert to his own readership: He reports that:
The Financial Times, one of the most respected and widely read
newspapers on the planet, features an editorial today that openly admits
the agenda to create a world government based on anti-democratic
principles and concedes that the term "global governance" is merely a
euphemism for the move towards a centralized global government.
A euphemism is PR for what is really propaganda: the intent is to deflect
criticism and avoid alarming the people who will object to losing still more
of their freedom and liberty.
Chief foreign affairs correspondent, Gideon Rachman wrote "For the first
time in my life, I think the formation of some sort of world government is
plausible." He cited the financial crisis, "global warming" and the "global
war on terror" as three major issues through which the New World Order is
being introduced.
Financial crisis, "global warming" and the "global war on terror"...the
problems set up by the manipulators to lever their solutions. Lock that in:
financial crisis, "global warming" and the "global war on terror" are
issues that can be used to manipulate the masses. This is the role of
propaganda, PR for the New World Order..
If you think there is REALLY a consensus among scientists that man-made
CO2 emissions is causing global warming...you've been flim-flammed by the
Ministry of "Truth" and the United Nations. You've been indoctrinated since
the 1970's to love the environment or Gaia or Mother Earth under false
claims, and
Al Gore implies that polar bears can't
swim so you would infer that polar bears must be in some kind of trouble.
You've been manipulated to believe that
CO2, a fundamental building block of life
is endangering the planet. You've been conned your whole life to believe
that your government would not lie to you and that there are terrorists in
foreign lands who
hate you for your freedom. You've been
misinformed for your whole life to believe that you owe taxes. They got a
cartoon duck
to do the job in 1943 and you bought the line, or your parents did. You've
been led to believe that inflation was caused by low productivity fostered
by labor unions instead of the
printing presses churning out paper money.
And too many of you have believed that there is no conspiracy called the New
World Order. Well, there it is in Financial Times, big and bold and brassy.
Are the letters big enough yet for you to read the handwriting on the wall?
You've been fed propaganda your whole life and owning up to it is a huge
responsibility not many are able to muster.
Rachman admits that the euphemisms are necessary to keep "people in
talk-radio heartland from reaching for their rifles." This should tell you
two things, at least: on talk radio people have at least heard about the
cancer of world domination and New World Order and that a people who are
armed can cause some concern for the would-be power elite of the world. He
concedes that "international governance tends to be effective, only when it
is anti-democratic". To get total control of the planet they have discovered
that they cannot use democratic means. Remember Gandhi's teaching that "the
means ARE the ends, in embryo." The use of anti-democratic means can only
result in anti-democratic ends.
Referring to the experience of the European Union, Rachman writes, "In
general, the Union has progressed fastest when far-reaching deals have been
agreed by technocrats and politicians – and then pushed through without
direct reference to the voters." Does that system of governance sound humane
and humanitarian to you? Does that seem friendly, the government as servant
of the people? You are to be treated as though you were a cow being
"punched" by cow punchers at the big ranch. You're not going to be consulted
in regards to issues that affect, your life, liberty and pursuit of
happiness. You will be prodded, branded, dehorned, castrated, fed, butchered
or sent to the knackery by the technocrats and politicians who just don't
care about your life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. If we let this
happen, this would be the end of the human experiment of democracy and
freedom.
Totalitarianism is a devolution of humanity. Gideon Rachman is one of
many elitists who is still so primitive in his perception of reality and
backward in his concept of humanity that he subscribes to a belief in
totalitarianism as a higher form of social structure. He reveals the subtle,
brutal savagery of globalism, the New World Order. Gideon Rachman is a
cow-puncher of the New Age.
He'd like you and me to be the punchee...
