How I Clobbered Every Bureaucratic Cash Confiscatory Agency Known to Man - Mary Croft

Dedication

For my sons, Colin Thomas and James Casey

updated December 2005

Acknowledgement

I could not have written this without the assistance of Ray Cox and Rice McLeod

(listen to Rice McLeod’s program, Who Are You?, on WWFAR.com Sundays 7pm Pacific)

No Disclaimer

There is no disclaimer in this book because the reader will learn that we are all responsible for our perception and interpretation of anything and everything we experience. I have no intention of disclaiming anything I write. Maybe what I tell you will allow you to change your mind about how you want to conduct your affairs from now on. Anyone reading this book is wise enough to follow one’s own counsel and therefore acknowledges that I cannot, do not, and will not tell anyone what to do.

CONTENTS

FOREWORD

Some actually did know about the fraudulent banking system and yet felt already defeated. They remain part of the problem by refusing to become part of the solution.

Needless to say, suggesting we have been conned into playing an insidious game which is destroying our lives, our futures, our fellowship, our spirituality, and our true natures, will meet with non-receptive minds. Consequently, in exasperation one night I resolved that my book would be futile – a waste of my time and energy. I declared I would put my efforts back into developing my Energy Psychology practice.

Brahma Sahampati exhorts the Buddha to conquer His hesitation:

"May the Venerable One preach the Doctrine! There are beings whose spiritual eyes are hardly darkened by light dust, these will understand the Doctrine. In the land of Magadha a false doctrine has prevailed up to the present, elaborated by men whose minds were contaminated (by ignorance). Now open to them the gate of Immortality (literally, of the deathless).

"Arise, O Victorious One ! Travel through-out the world, O Chief of Pilgrims (beings who wander in the round of successive births and deaths). There are some who will understand Thee."

The Buddha insisted strongly on the necessity of examining the propositions put forward by Him, and of understanding them personally before accepting them as true. The ancient texts leave no doubt on this point:

"Do not believe on the strength of traditions even if they have been held in honour for many generations and in many places; do not believe anything because many people speak of it; do not believe on the strength of sages of old times; do not believe that which you have yourselves imagined, thinking that a god has inspired you. Believe nothing which depends only on the authority of your masters or of priests. After investigation, believe that which you have yourselves tested and found reasonable, and which is for your good and that of others."

"Doubt is an incitement to research, and research is the path to true knowledge."

"Why are these teachings secret? Does that mean I can’t write and tell about them?" "No, Alexandra, these teachings are not called ‘secret’ because it is forbidden to talk about them. They are ‘secret’ because so few who hear them understand."

Immediately I began writing, yet from a completely different perspective from my previous attempts. Following is the result of this inspiration. I ask that you take the Buddha’s suggestion – "investigate, believe what is reasonable and for your good and that of others."

I have determined that writing this book is my responsibility.

Truth

We serve no one by withholding information. We do not serve ourselves by refusing to investigate. Lack of information never assisted anyone. Accurate information allows us options; we can choose to take action based upon it or choose to ignore it, but not knowing does not assist us. So put aside your preconceived notions, your psychological defence mechanisms, and your prejudices. Take a chance on remembering what could well grant you complete economic, emotional, and spiritual freedom.

Many people have ruined their lives when they could have prevented it ...but for want of opening their minds.

NOTES

I have used abbreviations for nouns such as the alphabet agencies of the government/’gov’t’ including:

$$$ – what is commonly thought of as ‘money’

Money – something of intrinsic value, no longer in existence since 1933

IRS/CRA – Internal Revenue Service/ Canada Revenue Agency

FRB/BC – Federal Reserve Bank/ Bank of Canada

FRN/BCN – Federal Reserve Notes/ Bank of Canada Notes

USD/CAD – US Dollar/ Canadian Dollar

USA/CA – the corporations USA/ CANADA

USG – private, foreign, belligerent corporation masquerading as the united States/ American government

CAG – private, foreign, belligerent corporation masquerading as the Canadian government

Can/Am – Canada/ America – the people and/or the territory of the provinces/united States

UCC – Uniform Commercial Code – rules for commercial/ contract law – the only law in operation today

UCC-1 – Financing Statement, filed in USA

PPSA – Personal Property Security Agreement – a Financing Statement, filed in CANADA

EFT – Electronic Funds Transfer

IMF – International Monetary Fund/ World Bank/ Vatican/ Crown (private section of London, England)

PTB – Powers-That-Be/ Zionists/ Illuminati/ Masons/ Matrix/ Global Elite/ NWO (New World Order)/International Bankers

SSN/SIN – Social Security Number / Social Insurance Number (socialist numbers)

SS/CP – Social Security/ Canada Pension

Banksters – public entities/ gov’t agencies/ bureaucrats which confiscate funds, property, assets of Can/Am people to collect the interest on the debt due to the Involuntary Bankruptcy of USA/ CA for the purpose of total control of the people of the world;

ACIM – A Course In Miracles by The Foundation for Inner Peace (three spiritual texts)

Intuition – Higher Self/ Holy Spirit/ Oneness/ Jesus/ Angels/ Guides/ Higher Consciousness/ Universal Intelligence/ ‘gut’ Knowing/ Collective Unconscious/ Spiritual Middle-man between the Creator and me/ Source.

PREFACE

A man and a woman met at a party on a Friday evening and were immediately attracted to one another. After some perfunctory chit-chat he invited her to his house where she remained the entire weekend. The sex was great; the conversation was fabulous. They discussed their respective attitudes on every conceivable subject; they laughed, they reminisced over their childhoods, school, and previous lovers. They talked about every member of their families; they described in detail their interests – many of which they shared – their occupations, and their friends. Throughout these intimate conversations they made love. He was a fabulous cook and so after going to the market on Saturday morning, he created sumptuous meals for the remainder of her visit. Each mentioned what s/he wanted in a mate and the other corroborated. There was even talk of a future together. By Sunday brunch, each admitted to feeling as if s/he had known each other his/her entire life and quite possibly even prior to this lifetime. Indeed, they had found their soul-mates. After supper on Sunday night when the end of their most ecstatic weekend was about to end, snuggled up watching a romantic movie, promising never to let the other go, she asked, "How much money do you make?" His response was, "That’s personal."

INTRODUCTION

PART I

WHAT HAPPENED

Lo and behold, she said, "You just send the letters." I leapt from my chair – my prayer had indeed been answered – ask and ye shall receive. She then produced a series of letters, the drift of which was to request the bank to provide me with three things:

1. validation of the debt (the actual accounting);

2. verification of their claim against me (a sworn affidavit or even just a signed invoice); and,

3. a copy of the contract binding both parties.

1. Full Disclosure (we are not told that we are creating the credit with our signature);

2. Equal Consideration (they bring nothing to the table, hence they have nothing to lose);

3. Lawful Terms and Conditions (they are based upon fraud); and

4. Signatures of the Parties/ Meeting of the Minds (corporations can’t sign because they have no right, or  mind, to contract as they are legal fictions). Credit cards are win/ win for the banks and lose/ lose for everyone else – it is the slickest con game on the planet.

Authority

From then on, I became suspect of everything which might be construed as propaganda or about which my mother had warned me, "Consider the source". By that she meant, always look for a vested interest. Question the credibility of the source. Who says so? Quo warranto (by what authority)? Who stands to gain? This is now commonly known as, "Follow the money".

A psychologist once told me, "Don't ever do anything for any male over the age of 10 unless you are specifically asked." We are destroying our children by prolonging childhood. This is by design of the corporate monsters, Dewey et al. Kids ought to be out doing what they want by age 12 and we ought to be available ONLY for counsel. I told my boys that in my books, age 13 is the age of majority.

It seems the purpose of the so-called educational system is not to educate us to be free-thinking natural beings, but rather to distort what is really going on in the world and also convince us that we will be happy if we just get a good education in order to get a good job in order to make a lot of money in order to buy as many worthless items as possible, and thereby become dependent upon them, in order to create as much debt as possible, thereby enslaving us on all counts – programming, slave-labour, debt, addiction, and ultimate confiscation of property – the first plank of the Communist Manifesto. Please keep in mind this goal as you

read and it will become clear that not only is this precisely what is going on but also that there is a lawful and

spiritual way out of it. Your peace of mind depends upon it – and isn’t this really all we truly want?

I knew at age nine, when my parents pulled the "Eat your dinner; there are children starving in China"

were starving children meant they had the means to do something about it and I noticed nothing was being

done about it ... by those with the means. Sure, CARE packages, which depended upon the generosity of the

it that way. It would have been easy to correct if indeed the PTB wanted it corrected – same as every other

At age 9 I experienced my first commercial success. I wanted a hula hoop and on my way home from

school I went to the local smoke and gift shop to look longingly at a big, red hula hoop hanging on the wall.

The cost was $2.98. I was shocked and appalled. I told my father, who happened to work in the ‘plastic

pipe’ business, the cost of the hula hoop, and he explained to me that it cost only pennies to make. I returned

to the store the next day to stare at it with the thought, ‘if only...’. Finally, I said to the store owner, "I really

want that red hula hoop. I think $2.98 is too much for a child my age to pay." On my way home from

school the same day I went in and noticed that he had dropped the price to $1.98 so I bought it. If you don’t

ask, you don’t get.

In 1968 I told my mother, "I don’t know what to do with my $$$; I don’t trust the banks". I don’t

know why I might have made this comment because my father thought the banks were great so I didn’t get

any cues from him. Au contraire, when my brother failed a grade at school, he told him, "You just lost

$10,000 dollars." Clearly he saw life as the means to accumulate $$$ and anything which ‘went wrong’ in

life was measured thus. Mum looked at me askance at first and then said, "You’re probably right. Buy

‘things’. Every day the value of ‘money’ diminishes through inflation and pretty soon you will rather have

things than valueless money." I think she anticipated another depression. If she were alive today, I feel

certain she would be very aware of the imminent economic collapse. I like to think she might see this as

‘good news’ as opposed to how most people see it, if indeed they see it at all.

When I was twenty I worked for a bank. After six weeks I told the teller next to me that I figured out how

to rob the bank and I described to her my methods. I’d tell you but I don’t recall and besides it would no

longer be true due to EFT (Electronic Funds Transfer) banking. I thought she would be excited but instead

she was clearly horrified and the next day I was given notice to leave. My father always told me, "Get

yourself with a good company". This, coming from a man whose ‘good company’ had him working nights

when he was 59, fueled my position that we are meant to do what we love to do ... and nothing else.

After I dropped out of university I went to work for American Airlines. After a month I told a fellow

employee who had trained with me that I wanted to get my own place and then asked, "But how will I pay

the rent when I no longer have the job?" She told me I was silly to worry about that. Within a month our

training class of 5 was laid off. Each of the others was hired back; I was not. I learned later that I had scored

for that particular job. Its not so much that I am brilliant as much as apparently I am equally left and rightbrained,

which is somewhat uncommon. Most people do well in either the Math or the English part of an

aptitude test, but not both, as I had done, and so my score was off the charts. Now I had this expensive

apartment. I wished that I had listened to my intuition.

I was always a Maverick. I told a friend, who happened to work as a teacher, that if I ever have children I

will teach them that they are their own authority and never to let any teacher intimidate them. She was aghast

and said in no uncertain terms that this was the problem in the schools today – no respect for authority. I

the agenda which programs kids into believing that someone else knows what’s best for them. There is no

limit to the agencies, professionals, and bureaucrats which exist solely to dictate how we ought to live our

lives. Teachers, doctors, government, ministers, and bankers spend time, funds, and effort intending to

convince children what to think. I determined that my children would think for themselves.

Joseph Chilton Pierce, in his book, Magical Child, advises parents, "Children think their parents are

I read that J. P. Morgan had said, "I don’t want a lawyer to tell me what I cannot do; I hire an attorney to

my boys are too subjected to mind-manipulation (school, TV, friends) to grant me any credibility. (I was a

great parent before I had children.) Parenthood is like a 20-year sentence, except in jail they let you read.

The best thing about having children is finally getting to understand why we (all) felt neglected by our

parents. We have, as they had, lives to lead and we children were only a part of it. As children, we presumed

we were their entire purpose in life. Feeling the neglect was painful only because we blamed our lack of

worth for any inattention. When we have our own children and realize, that as much as we love our children,

they still are not our entire lives although for awhile we are theirs. It allows us to see it wasn’t our lack of

worth which kept our parents from focussing on us 100% of the time, it was that they had a life of which we

were only a part.

About thirty years ago I heard Peter Fonda say, on a talk show, "Try not paying your taxes and find out

who owns your house." My eyelids flew open like Venetian Blinds and I suddenly knew that I knew this

and somewhere hidden in my psyche was the entire story.

As a teenager, I worked for both corporations and smaller, privately-owned companies. Never conscious

of it until much later, I noticed that while working for a small firm or real living souls, I would faithfully put

10¢ into the jar for coffee when doing so was based upon the ‘honour system’. The goods belonging to the

privately-owned company were not mine until I compensated them in some way. Much later I realized that

when I had worked for corporations, I would rob them to the extent of my ability. I think intuitively I knew

that anything a corporation ostensibly ‘owned’ was already mine, because I had pre-paid everything (more

on this later). For awhile I put it down to anonymity, but it wasn’t that; it was the fact that I knew it was mine

... and I was accurate. Again, my intuition was correctly guiding me and this is why I never felt any guilt.

In the early 1970s I was in the car with my father and brother. My father was telling my brother to put

the ‘maximum allowable’ into RRSP as it was a great investment as he won’t pay tax on that amount until he

takes it from the account. I’m surprised my father didn’t see the problem with this since he was so acutely

aware of the insidious graduated income tax not to mention the worst tax of all – inflation. My bro would pay

much more tax later than he ever would then. Again, I recall sitting back and looking out the window and

intuitively knowing that not only would he never see any of his RRSP investments but also he would never

see any of his company pensions. If you think I am inaccurate, because you are already receiving yours, you

must be older than I am. I’m referring to us baby boomers; we’re in our 50s and we will not see our

pensions at age 65. If you feel fear from reading that, be certain to recognize that your fear is not about your

future; it is about your belief in your powerlessness. Why would you think that there being no government

financial security in your future has anything to do with who you are and what you can do? I’ll get to this in

Part 3.

In 2002 my friend told me she was frantic about $$$, in particular, paying the mortgage. She flailed her

pay. She said, "If I can just hold out another 12 years (age 65) I can collect my pension. I told her she’ll

never see it. She dismissed me with a wave of her hand.

FDR, 1933

For you Canadians who are feeling smug that this is not happening in Canada consider that Canada is the

certainly differences in our cultures but don’t kid yourself about jurisdiction.

I always attributed to my cynicism these intuitive glimpses into the future until I learned that in 1993, in

Canada, Bill C-124 was passed which states, approximately: In order to pay the national debt (as if there

confiscate the pensions, RRSPs, investments, property, and all other tangible assets of the people.

now though, remember, the entire raison d’etre of the government is to confiscate your property under the

guise of your having lost it because you couldn’t pay your ‘debts’. Unfortunately, most people have fallen

for this and most will continue to do so until they have nothing left which, I’ll explain later, is not as horrific

as you might think ... so lighten up. Living souls cannot have ‘debt’.

In 1975, after my mum died, I went into nurse’s training. During my psychiatric rotation I had a patient

called Bruce, who had been diagnosed "paranoid schizophrenic". I’d always thought schizophrenics simply

interpreted the illusion of life on this planet a bit more accurately than the rest of us and that there was

nothing ‘wrong’ with them; au contraire, there might be something wrong with someone who would label

another as ‘paranoid schizophrenic’. My teacher asked one morning, "Mary, tell us about your patient;

problems .... nothing wrong." She was incensed by my attitude and raged, "Of course there is or he

wouldn’t be here." I didn’t have to take this nonsense so I got up and left the room.

On my way out I wondered what I was intending to do. Ah! – I’ll look through his chart for ‘evidence’

that there is "nothing wrong with Bruce". Just as I went for his chart I noticed that a doctor was writing in it.

I said, "Just the man I want to see! What exactly is wrong with Bruce?" He answered, "Nothing; I’ve just

discharged him." Do I have horseshoes up my ass, or what? So, I said, "Will you go and tell my teacher

this; she thinks I’m being contrary; and he did. I was a big hit with my fellow students. I realized just how

important my timing had been. When another incident re-enforced this I vowed to act accordingly from then

on.

hitch-hiking through Florida and I was picked up by a truck driver. They are well-known for being safe so

without compunction I climbed aboard.

After a bit, he told me he was going to stay at the Ramada Inn and carry on in the morning. It was only

late afternoon so I thought I could make it to Orlando and told him that I was going to continue hitching. He

graciously told me that if I didn’t get a ride I could join him for supper. He would even put me up for the

night because he always got a room with two beds.

On the road I noticed coming towards me from the direction I was heading, a man leaning out of the

window of his VW bug. He got off the highway, swung around and stopped beside me. He was blond and

blue-eyed, with a smile to beat the band. He asked me where I was headed. "Obviously not the same place

you’re headed." I told him I was from Toronto and was headed for Orlando. He mentioned he was going to

an art show and that if I were still here on his way back, he’d pick me up since he lived in Orlando. This was

laughable and I told him I would not be out here for long, because if I didn’t get a ride I had planned to go

into the Ramada Inn and let the truck driver buy me dinner. He shrugged and waved good-bye.

I did not get a ride and so I did get dinner with the truck driver. Then we went along to the bar where he

proceeded to get very drunk. I told him I was going to bed and got the key. He stumbled in after another

hour. I was in bed with my clothes on because I had become wary when I saw him so drunk. After several

lewd propositions I told him if he said one more thing to me I’d have to leave. His last ditch was, "How

would you like to wake up in the morning with a smile on your face and $50 richer?" That did it. I jumped

up, grabbed my stuff and stomped out. If I couldn’t get a ride at 4:30 in the afternoon, where did I think I

was going at 11:30 at night? I quickly thought I could approach a kind, married, business man in the bar –

you know the type – one with a daughter my age ... and tell him my horror story. Men are always happy to

open the door of the bar which led outside. Coming up the driveway at that instant was the handsome man in

the VW bug. "Hey, Toronto! Where are you going?" I threw my bag into the back seat, my body into the

passenger seat, and said, "With you."

I learned from that incident that if I just be myself, everything works out, particularly my timing; it was

precise. Due to this realization one would think that I might have the moxy to do anything I wanted with no

fear of failure. Alas, the fear had been so ingrained over the years that I regarded that episode as a fluke

rather than an example of the possibility for all circumstances in which I found myself. All I had to do is

remember who I am. I notice that when there appears to be any struggle at all to do anything I feel compelled

to do or accomplish, I can count on the timing being off. When I just "do what’s next" everything works

out.

I worked as a nurse on and off for 25 years – ‘on’ when I needed the cash, and ‘off’ when I was bored

and frustrated by the unethical nature of it all – I never saw or knew of anyone – patient, friend, or relative –

who died of cancer. They all died of the ‘medical treatment’ for cancer.

Nurse’s training was cheap, brief, and I could go anywhere I wanted – like California, which I did. In the

early 80’s I was earning $22 (USD) an hour. When the IRS sent me a bill for a tax they thought I owed, I

smelled a rat. We’ve all heard horrendous IRS stories. Since we are programmed to fear, these stories can

influence our behaviour, however, if we are aware that fear itself is the killer ("do not take counsel from your

fears") then we can notice it and behave in a manner which works for us. So I challenged them. I noticed

that they could not support their claim. I also noticed that the amount they claimed I owed rose dramatically

with each letter and for no apparent reason other than they added penalties, late fees, interest, etc. The higher

the amount, the clearer their scheme became to me. I also noticed that every letter came not only from a

different entity but also with no signature, thereby rendering it an invalid commercial instrument. All invoices,

in order to be valid, must be signed by someone able to bind the corporation in contract. We are not lawfully

due’, yet have no clout as they are incomplete.

I shan’t outline my interim steps, yet here’s the drift about what allowed me finally to deal with the IRS.

I admit it took years, however it’s interesting that of all the people with whom I not only chatted about the

IRS but also treated for anxiety over the IRS, I noticed they all had one thing in common: the IRS sent them

a bill, the amount of which was above and beyond anything credible. Anyone with a brain can see that this is

what blows their cover. If they sent a bill for $2,000, one might be inclined to pay it. But a bill for $23,000

when one earns only $30,000 is simply laughable. It is this which gets people to declare they will never file

or pay again. There are now over 45 million people in the uSA who are no longer filing 1040s. Those who

file 1041s can get back all the tax they have ever paid. I am just now learning about this. I’m sure there is

something similar, that of filing for a ‘Trust’, in Canada.

IRS agents now openly admit that they have what is termed, "fishing expeditions" whereby they send

out a few million "Notice of Assessment" just to see who bites. The amount is not enough to create so

much angst as to get questioned on it yet enough to make it worth their while. Most people will figure that a

$2,000 bill from the IRS is not worth fighting and/or going to jail over so they pay it. If the bill were

$25,000 all hell would break loose. Imagine $2,000 from several million unquestioning taxpayers; wow.

I actually began to suspect that IRS agents, at some unconscious level, want to expose their own

fraudulent activities – clear their conscience, so to speak, and this is why they send out these inane letters. Yet,

as David Icke says, "Those at the top of the pyramid are the manipulators of human consciousness. They are

sentient programs with no soul." So, there is not one iota of divine intervention at the IRS/CRA; rather this is

a case of four things;

1. they are desperate,

2. they are surreptitious,

3. they get a percentage of the $$$ they recover,

4. they require our fear in order to stay alive. They think the extortive ‘total amount owing’ frightens us

when in fact it is laughable.

1. They are so desperate that they will do weird things which blow their cover. IRS/CRA is so frantic

about collecting cash in order to pay the interest on the loan from the World Banksters that it will even

behave in a self-defeating manner. It frantically sends out statements from every remotely conceivable source

– have you ever noticed that you never get one from the same person/ office more than once? This is because

they are scrambling and no one knows what anyone else is doing, not to mention that the name at the bottom

of the statement is the name of the computer which generated the letter. There is no living soul behind the

letter. The timing is ludicrous and the wording is ridiculous as letters are actually based upon an IRS Manual

called How to Write a Non-Response Response. Take a look at some of their letters and you’ll realize that

they have been composed by a group of monkeys, not unlike those whom Bob Newhart describes in his skit,

An Infinite Number of Monkeys. "If you take an infinite number of monkeys and an infinite number of

typewriters, over an infinite period of time, they will ultimately type all the great works. Needless to say there

would have to be people hired to monitor what the monkeys were turning out. Here is a day in the life of one

of these monitors: ‘Oh, Harry, I think we might have something here! "To be ... or not ... to be ....... that is

the ......... Gazornin Plan."’" Next time you get a letter from IRS/CRA, just picture this same scene in your

mind and you’ll know with whom you’re truly dealing.

2. What IRS/CRA want is for you to create a controversy. They make this ‘amount owing’ so ‘off the

charts’ that you will either telephone or write to them about this ‘outrage’ thereby creating a contract with

them. This is all they need to enforce their nonsense. I do not contract with thugs. They are worse than loan

sharks. If you argue, then you have created a controversy and the entire issue can go to court in order to be

adjudicated. If you simply tell them you don’t want to contract with them where is the controversy? What is

at some point you will unwittingly grant them jurisdiction over you. Until you do this, they cannot hold you –

Call it luck but one day I got a (signed) letter from some hotshot at the IRS stating that my account is

‘paid in full’ and apologizing for any inconvenience. The only explanation I can think of is that I never

testified, argued, or contracted further with them; I only asked questions. You might have read recently about

the pilot who won against IRS in Federal ‘court’. She won because she had documented that she had

continually asked IRS to provide the law compelling her to pay tax on her income and they had failed to

respond. Her affidavits proved they had defaulted so the judge ruled in her favour. I know of a fellow in BC

who did the same thing. CRA failed to respond to three of his letters – they dishonoured him – and the judge

declared, "Case dismissed!"

3. Each agent is vicious because he stands to receive personally a percentage of the funds he recovers

from you. Don’t fall for his intimidation. Know that he is as frightened for his job as you might be about

losing your $$$.

4. About 15 years ago, a man received from IRS, a letter saying they intended to audit him. He was very

frightened and intimidated. An IRS agent came to his house since this is where he claimed to have his office.

I told him he was not required by law to let her into his house and he ought to demand by what authority she

intended to investigate his business. He said, "If I’m co-operative and courteous, she will be reasonable."

His allowing her into his house was deemed his acquiescence thereby granting her jurisdiction. He thought

it would end quickly yet it only allowed IRS to know they had another sucker who fell for their bluff. IRS

hounded him for another dozen years until they levied his bank account and confiscated his ‘pay cheques’

from his customers. Don’t keep your cash in a bank account. To this day, no one has ever stolen my $$$

from either my pocket or my house yet banksters have twice stolen my $$$ from my bank accounts.

Realizing they would put him out of business he left the country. It was his fear which gave the IRS this

incredible control over his life. Had he turned around and looked at the monster chasing him in his dream, he

would have seen that it was not what he thought. The nonsense ended only after I wrote the IRS a cheque

The son of a fellow I know was fleeced by the IRS who confiscated from his bank account $11,000. He

wrote them a letter which included five (5) questions. The IRS agent invited him to his office in order to

answer his questions. At the time of the meeting the IRS agent returned to his account the $11,000. You

might want to know what the five questions were. He asked for answers to the following to be made under

penalty of perjury: the law requiring Americans to pay income tax, their regulatory authority and delegated

authority to address him, the law which made the IRS part of the Constitution, the agent’s oath of office, and

the contract with both signatures on it. Since NONE of these exists, his $11,000 was refunded. Since an oath

of office by any ‘public official’ is their swearing to uphold and protect our rights, we accept their oath of

office into the matter at hand and they are bound to honour their oaths and stop attacking us. We are not

bound to respond to anyone who has no oath of office. This Oath of Office limits those who are in the biz of

confiscating our rights and freedoms. Always ask for it and if you don’t get one be sure to issue your own

orders to them on what you want them to do. Remember who you are.

One of my most memorable experiences was when I asked an IRS agent, in person, to show me in the

Internal Revenue Manual, which is over 7,000 pages and about 5 inches thick – all of it bogus – where it is

written that I must pay a tax on my income. He pointed to the book and said, "In there." "I believe that you

think it is ‘in there’; show me where." This time he pounded the book and then fluttered the pages and

again, this time more forcefully said, "In the manual!" "I see ... where exactly?" Now he got even more

violent with his beloved manual at which point my friend and I burst out laughing and just left him

spluttering in his office. Don’t take these twits too seriously. Call their bluff.

CRA sent me a Notice of Assessment wherein they told me they had over-paid me and I was to return

some $$$. This was due to their having confiscated funds from my ‘paycheque’, without my permission,

when I worked as an RN. I sent them a Bond for their debt and to settle and close the account. Sure, I

received a few subsequent letters from unknown entities. Since I had sent my Bond to Alan Nymark, the

commissioner, I wasn’t about to correspond with anyone but him. He didn’t seem to have any complaint

about my bond. I returned all the CRA correspondence, ‘acceptance denied for cause without dishonour’,

since their letters were immaterial. I haven’t heard from them in months. If indeed I really ‘owed’ them

something, my experience has taught me that they would confiscate, with impunity, the entire contents of my

down both feet at STOP sign." I laughed; any motorcyclist knows that we keep one foot on the brake.

However, a few blocks later, I was stopped by a cop. When I asked why he stopped me he said that I hadn’t

stopped at the STOP sign. I responded (this was before I learned never to testify or argue the facts) that

indeed I had stopped. He said, "You didn’t put down both feet at the STOP sign." I was stunned! I had

to warn me – verbatim. I was shaken that I had not trusted my intuition. The subsequent ramifications

became a bureaucratic nightmare.

I became aware of many other times I had intended to warn myself about one thing or another and had

ignored my intuition. Clearly my lesson in life was to trust myself – to BE my own authority. I had blatantly

failed to behave according to what I knew to be true. I vowed always to listen to only me.

In 1996, I received one of those, "Here’s $3,500 (USD) for a Happy Christmas .... just sign the back of

handed $3,500 FRNs. They were right; I did have a happy Christmas that year. When they sent me a

statement about a month later, trying to collect something from me which not only didn’t exist but also didn’t

cost them anything other than postage and printing, I requested proof of their loss. They were flummoxed.

they never lent. I hear where your ego just took you ... ‘well, you got something for nothing’. No, I didn’t;

I sold my signature for $3,500 – a good price back in 1996. All I got was $3,500 in debt notes. Since then,

I’ve done the math. My signature is now worth 15 billion dollars (CAD).

Then they got really jumpy and sent me threatening letters. I asked that they show me their loss. What

were electronically credited by the ‘other’ bank (there’s only one bank). Is the other bank out any $$$? No,

the returned cheque with my signature was their credit. So their books were balanced. Were my books

balanced? Of course! My debit was my signature and my credit was the cash. It is all just bookkeeping

entries. Who owes what to anyone? The transactions are complete. It was simply an exchange of debit/

credit. Why would I give them anything more than what I already gave them – my signature, which is by the

way, by far more valuable than $3,500 because they will lend funds against my signature many times, earning

them, depending upon the rate of interest, an unlimited number of times that amount. This is called

‘fractional banking’ and their not apprising me of this is called ‘bank fraud’. So in fact I did them a huge

favour by selling them my signature. They informed me that I had not ‘repaid my loan’. This is called

‘double billing’. ‘Double billing’ is fraudulent.

Have you ever gone crazy when a corporation spends 50¢ on a stamp to send you a bill for 11¢ ? You

wonder what they’re smoking to make such a fiscally inane blunder and yet, this is fabulous evidence for the

fact that it has nothing to do with $$$, rather the balancing of their books. Their billing you is simply ‘a cost

of doing business’, in particular, to be certain that the credits balance the debits on their ledger.

The ‘money’ the banks issue is merely bookkeeping entries. It costs them nothing and is not backed by

their wealth, efforts, property, or risk. From 1913 until 1933 the U.S. paid ‘interest’ with more and more

gold. The structured inevitability soon transpired – the Treasury of the United States’ government was

empty, the debt was greater than ever, and the U.S. was forced into involuntary bankruptcy. This means that

the Crown laid claim to everything. In exchange for using notes belonging to bankers who create them out of

businesses, and resources – in ever-increasing amounts.

At that time I did not know what I know today and so they did put a smudge upon my credit record yet it

was worth it because at that point, with a black mark anyway, I figured that I might just as well ring up all the

credit cards and ask the same question. The upshot was that I lived about 3 years without credit but since I

than double for something I never received, it was well worth it. Meanwhile, the process has improved and I

intend there to be only temporary black smudges on my credit record. I’m still working on this.

Bank. They sold my signature for who knows how much. After I used all the credit I had created, I

debt in order to balance their books. Now they wanted me to send them over $11,000. I asked them to send

me a copy of the contract between ‘MARY’ (the name in upper case letters) and MBNA. I guess they

couldn’t find it ... maybe because it never existed. I also asked them for validation of the debt (record of their

alleged contract. They began to telephone asking me to send them $$$ yet never put anything in writing.

What does this tell you? They had no valid claim. I told them I was very willing to pay any obligation I might

owe, if they could provide proof of their claim. They could not.

They were incapable of substantiating their claim. I never received anything from them suggesting that

the manner in which I had paid them was insufficient, unacceptable, improper, or failed to discharge the debt.

them another signature attached to the final amount they claimed I owed them, not to mention a few hundred I

sent while I was busy ringing up the card, so they made a killing off me. If they had a legal leg to stand upon

they most certainly would have written to me, not to mention sent their ‘legal counsel’ after me, which they

did threaten, by the way, but only over the telephone, never on paper. Idle verbal threats have no lawful clout.

I never stiffed anyone. The ‘contract’ they believe I had with them was invalid because there was no full

disclosure – one of the requirements of a valid contract. It was not spelt out to me that they were in the

fraudulently confiscated, they generally leave people like me alone. They don’t want to let the cat out of the

bag. It would mean the demise of their racket, not to mention the entire economic system. But isn’t this what

we want? It isn’t working for us – 99% of the world’s population; its working for only them – 1%.

About a year later MBNA did in fact file suit against the entity listed on the credit card account. Even

according to Financial Consumer Agency of Canada, MBNA are thugs and they advise ‘consumers’ to avoid

them. MBNA is particularly vicious and the reason is because they have their own legal team. They don’t

sell their accounts to third party collection agents, as most credit card banks do. Collection agents have no

they are powerless to collect on ‘deficiencies’. Rather than produce for MBNA my plethora of documents

evidencing that they were in dishonour, as they failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, that

I had accepted their offer and returned it thereby vitiating any controversy requiring adjudication, I just settled

and closed the accounting.

First, I apprised the Minister of Finance that I would be authorizing MBNA to use my exemption via a

Pre-Authorized Transfer and unless he could rebut my position with relevant, specific, lawful authority and

how it applies to me, I’d go ahead and send MBNA a transfer instrument, which I did. I made sure that I

a Statement of Account showing the balance as zero, and a Confirmation of Agreement that the accounting

was settled and closed, I never heard from them again. I figure $14,000 from my $15,000,000,000.00 isn’t

going to hurt me.

A major law firm in Toronto threatened to sue me, on behalf of their client, CIBC, for about $11,000. We

exchanged a few letters and finally I wrote, "I am not a corporation or a government-created fiction; I do not

give you permission to make a legal determination about me or the entity you are accosting; you have failed

to provide evidence of a contract between MARY and LAW FIRM, also evidence of your consideration, and

you have failed to sign your offer of contract under penalty of perjury. Said failure constitutes your

agreement that you are a third party interloper, you have no legal standing, no first-hand knowledge of the

matter, and your claim is fraudulent." I never heard from them again. I knew that I had succeeded when I got

a call from a collection agent claiming to be collecting for CIBC. I could hardly contain my glee. This

confirmed that the law firm had told CIBC that they could not sue me and so, in frustration, CIBC simply

sold the account – again – to yet another collection agent that also threatened to sue me. I told him I look

forward to it. You know I was dying to ask him, "If a major law firm in Toronto failed in its attempts to sue

me what makes you think you will succeed?"

I had no idea that speeding fines in BC are so extortive, yet, I actually like the idea since, the grander the

charges for which I can stiff them, the happier I feel. My friend got a ticket for $358 for over 30 km. over the

speed limit. Apparently, the fine for over 30 km. is automatically over $300. I just had her write across the

ticket, "Receipt of your offer of contract is acknowledged and hereby returned for discharge and closure for

your failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. I do not wish to contract with you. date, BY:

autograph, agent". That was the end of that. I ought to mention that since implementing any of the abovelisted

successful remedies, I have been even more successful with easier, faster, more succinct remedies

which I would outline here for you yet we continually improve them.

Is anyone tired of the GST or just sales tax in general? My suggestion for those in biz who are

collecting GST for the feds and not being compensated for their time and labour is to enclose an invoice for

your fee of maybe 90% for doing their dirty work for them, deduct that from what you have collected, and

enclose a cheque for the remainder. A better idea is to quit charging your customers a tax they are not

required to pay. This will give you an edge over your competition who still believe they must charge their

clients GST.

I am still dealing with collection agents and credit card banks but I have way more fun with them now. I

ask the credit card companies to send me a bill, not a statement, to include a copy of the contract, evidence

their consideration (what they gave me, which was nothing, in exchange for the $$$ they want), and have it

signed under the full, commercial liability of one who can bind their corporation in contract. Since they can’t

do this and it would be fraud if they did, they pass it along to collection agents who are even more fun

because, who are they? I never had any contract with them either. They are all third party debt collectors /

interlopers. I just tell them to get out of my commercial affairs. I like best the ones who have the attorneys

write the letters because .... the bigger they are, the harder they fall. My latest ploy is I just pay them with a

transfer instrument – makes them crazy.

The economics of banking is counterfeiting. We have been deceived into thinking that we were lent other

depositor’s deposited funds. Banksters cause us to think that if we do not pay back those funds, the bank

and its depositors will be out the cash. Remember, all you borrowed was monetized credit, which your

signature created – probably about $100,000.00 – 10% of which they extended back to you. You lent

yourself the funds. Why are you paying back anyone? Ask a banker about this, as I did, and watch him stop

breathing.

If a counterfeiter counterfeits $$$ and lends it to us, do we have any moral or legal obligation to repay

the loan? NO ! The law (statute) says counterfeiting is illegal and that we do not have to repay the

counterfeiter. But the banksters are careful. The bank’s own published manual claims, "Money does not

have to be issued by the government or be in any special form. Money is anything that can be sold for cash

and which the banks accept as money". Aren’t they a riot?

The story about Dan Mahowney who allegedly defrauded the bank out of several million $$$ and also

the story about Frank Abegnale in his book Catch Me If You Can never took anyone else’s cash. Dan and

the investors in Mahowney’s case nor Pan Am employees in Abegnale’s case. I’ll bet to this day, both these

men think that they did something illegal. Yet, not one living soul lost any $$$ to either of them. The

corporate entities pretended theft and had them punished in order to preserve and perpetuate the scam.

When you purchase something from a shop and then return it, why are they so intent on getting back

evidence of exchange. The goods don’t matter, any more than the principal on a ‘loan’ matters. All they want

is the interest. Look at your minimum payment due on your credit card statement; its only the interest. The

A friend responded, "We don’t worry about money, if that’s what you’re asking." I was glad to hear

this but I know its only a matter of time. He and his wife are paying, via their labour, probably 4 times the

price of their 5 bedroom house which translates into 30 years of paying for the cost of maybe 6 months

labour plus the supplies it took to build. This disparate ratio seems never to be questioned. Whom are they

paying? The banks. For what? Credit. Did they get anything for their labour? You might think they got their

house for their labour yet they did not; they got their house for their signature on the promissory note. Their

‘labour’ is the confiscation of their lives.

Reserve Bank of Chicago

I first became aware that all my suspicions about the banking system were accurate when I read Thoren’s

book, Truth In Money. I learned that all money is ‘borrowed into existence’. It doesn’t exist until someone

borrows it. It is ‘debt-based money’, hence it is not really money since real money is based upon substance

– gold, silver, etc. If ‘money’ is borrowed into existence, then this is all that exists. So, where is the

‘interest’? It doesn’t exist. How can it possibly be paid? It can’t be paid because it is not part of what is

created. It simply does not exist. The currency we use is based upon our future labour which the Feds have

promised to the banksters. It also does not yet exist. Future generations are already enslaved to pay a debt

which does not exist.

We can’t pay debt with something of no substance. We also need to take a look at how the account

statements were created. Goods and services are assigned a value; everything is only true because someone

says so and someone else agrees to it. Do you ever question your bills, which are not true bills in commerce

When you go into a store to buy a book and you pay in whatever manner you choose, what do you get

for the payment? No, not the book; you get a receipt. The evidence for this is that the dollar amount on the

receipt matches precisely the dollar amount on your payment. It is an exact exchange. The book is not even

part of the equation. It was pre-paid; all you did was go to the store to claim and retrieve it. In order to

understand the concept of ‘pre-paid’, imagine this:

Suppose you want to open a restaurant and you just need another $10,000 and so you ask a friend to

lend it to you. Knowing that there is no money and the currency your friend has is essentially worthless

months you ashamedly go to him and say that there is no way you can ever pay him back, what with interest

and all, yet you are so ingratiated to him you tell him that he can eat in your restaurant any time he wants –

for free. Not only that but also you would be so grateful if he would because, alas, it would assuage your

guilt. All he is required to do when the waiter presents him with an itemization of his meal is to sign it; he is

not required to pay for his meal – its ‘prepaid’.

In the same way, our bills are already paid and, in fact, the corporate entity which is billing us would be

only too grateful if we would take advantage of our having prepaid them because then they wouldn’t have to

pay the tax on the $$$ we send them. So all that is required of us is to sign the invoice and return it to them.

The telephone company is funded by the government; you and I, and everyone who has a birth certificate or

socialist number have funded the government. So, we have an ‘exemption’ the same way your friend is

exempted from paying for his meals at your restaurant. Why is the telephone company sending us a

statement (not an invoice) with a ‘amount owing’ on it? We paid up front. All goods and services are now

lawfully ours just for the asking.

For a few years I have been traveling around in my ‘92 Cadillac, originally registered, licensed, and

insured in New Mexico. I can’t tell you how many people have told me that I was supposed to have

registered it in Alberta within 45 days of its being here. How is it that ‘everyone knows’ this? Well, that

would have been four years ago, so I suppose by their standards, I’m slightly overdue.

Since I know the difference between ‘registration’ and ‘recording’, I sent the Minister of Transport (I

conditions of which are that we agree that what I have put on my licence plate will identify my automobile as

there is an incident whereby they require to know who is involved. I enclosed a Surety Bond as security to

settle any claim of liability in the event of an incident requiring compensation from another living soul. I sent

a copy to the local gens d’armes. If I am asked about ‘proof of insurance’ I can honestly respond by

providing evidence that I have posted a million $ Bond.

The RCMP has been very accommodating whenever I have shown them my ‘International Driver

Permit’ ... which came from my computer. I slapped onto it a pic of me taken by my son and ... voila. They

pretend their interest is in the expiration date, however, I know they are really noticing that I have nothing

which can be construed as their having jurisdiction over me. (more on this in the section on ‘Licensure’). If

I’m ever stopped I have with me evidence of the tacit admission from the Minister himself that what I am

doing is lawful. If it isn’t, he has tacitly agreed to be held culpable. Since I claimed the Cadillac on a UCC 3

Addendum to my Financing Statement (UCC 1) and also on a PPSA, I control the Caddy and I can evidence

that none of the constabulary can legally confiscate it unless they compensate me for it. Over the date sticker

on the plate I put, "NO EXP" (No Expiry)

A fun thing to do if you are ever stopped by the cops, in response to, "Can I see your driver’s licence,

please?" is "Why would I want one of those?" There is no answer because what legal lunatic would carry

around the very thing which gets him into trouble. I think you’re safer with a 38 Special on the passenger

seat; at least it is not concealed. The only one who requires a driver licence is one who is operating in

commerce so, unless you are driving for hire – i.e.: driving in commerce – you are not required to have one.

Imagine when everyone begins to do what I and many others have done, the PTB will cease to function.

The only thing keeping everyone from doing what I do is fear, which is caused from lack of information,

time, and clarity on the concept. I intend to change this for you so that you can begin to ‘live your life’, doing

what you want instead of ‘earning your living’. Too many people are working way too hard to pay for:

1. things that are already theirs because they are pre-paid and all that is required is for them to claim

them; and

2. charges which they are not required to pay because they are not liable for them in the first place.

Since I caught on to how to make contracts work for me, my best example being the confirmation of

agreement to the terms and conditions of the contract I have with the Minister of Transport Canada, I decided

to have way more fun with this process. I wrote to the Minister of Justice Canada telling him I intended to

grow, process, market, sell, transport, possess, and use cannabis, aka marijuana. After 30 days I sent him a

smoke dope I’ll just notify the local RCMP so they know not to bother me. One of the terms of our contract

is that if I get into any trouble he agrees to be culpable.

Pursuing this adventure, I wrote to the Premier of the province and also the provincial Advisor for

Procedure Policy for Municipal Affairs and asked them both about ‘property tax’. Neither could prove that I

am required to pay property tax. The way to stop paying any tax, never mind property tax, is to remember

you are a sovereign and begin to behave like one. I intend to show the contract I have with them to those who

have what I require. I’ll show people – my dentist comes to mind – how to save thousands per year in

property tax and I’ll negotiate with them for whatever I need. Property taxes where I live are $5,000 a year.

I also sent a proposal of contract to Messieurs Nymark and McCallum (CRA Commissioner and

Minister of National Revenue) along with my Tax Exemption Certificate, begging them to prove where I owe

interminable list of other taxes, service fees, penalties, fines, etc. which keep people working at jobs they

don’t like and from families they generally do.

I estimated that the time I put into writing letters to credit card banks, along with putting up with their

annoying calls, etc. works out to no more than 40 hours per creditor. Since the cash I receive from said credit

is about $10,000, I realized that this is far more income per hour than I ever earned from the Medical Mafia. I

admit it is inconsistent but certainly more fun. The law suit filed by MBNA was one of the highlights of my

life. I love this stuff. Knowing that the Toronto law firm which represented CIBC was forced to drop their

intended suit due to my letter which let them know that I know ‘who I am’ was even better.

A few years ago I wanted to travel to Oregon. I always get nervous crossing the border, for no reason

other than Border Patrol, like cops, have no sense of personal power so they obtain jobs which make them

escalated by the day. By the time I got to the airport the price of the ticket was over $900 USD. I wrote a

crossing the border. To this day I wonder if the asset funds from my ‘closed cheque’ were ever credited to

United Airlines or did I play a small role in their declaring bankruptcy only a few months later.

For those of you who think I stiffed the airline, think again. The cheque was written on the private side of

the account – the closed side – which is not to be confused with the public side which is where the cash

comes in. Remember the ticket was ‘pre-paid’ and so the private cheque simply accessed my exemption. The

airline wasn’t out anything. Their account was credited, not with cash but with credit via EFT – electronic

funds transfer. The benefit of this is that the airline didn’t have to pay tax on that income since it did not

receive ‘fiat money’ which is why we are required to pay tax on it – it is not real substance; it is a fabrication

of the bankster’s mind and they want a fee from us for using it. Since I used real asset funds there was no

tax for the airline to pay. They loved me for it.

and for Christmas I ordered a bunch of high ticket items. I sent a ‘closed cheque’ written against a US bank

account, had the goods sent to a friend in New Mexico and she forwarded it to me. (the company wouldn’t

accept a check for delivery outside the USA). All worked out well except that my friend had sent the goods

via Fed Ex which then sent me a bill for $75.00 USD. So, I accepted for value their offer and returned it for

settlement and closure of the accounting.

A month later I received not only another bill but also the ‘Summary Sheet’ detailing their ‘claim’. I

wrote to them asking what they did with my payment. A month later I received another letter which I didn’t

open immediately. The following day I received a letter from a collection agent claiming they are collecting

for Fed Ex which prompted me to open the Fed Ex letter. It was an apology for any inconvenience they

might have caused me and that the bill was ‘Paid In Full’. I telephoned the collection agent and suggested

they contact Fed Ex whose most recent letter states the account has been paid. End of story.

Have you ever taken a cheque to the bank on which a cheque was drawn and been told by the bankster

that if you don’t have an account with the bank she will charge you a fee? The bankster is intending to

convince you that she is doing you a favour by cashing the cheque for you. Nothing could be further from

the truth. The bank is acting as fiduciary to its customer who wrote you the cheque and who also pays the

bank a monthly service fee to do so. The drawer is the debtor who owes you, the creditor. He is obliged to

come to your house and pay you cash. Since this is inconvenient for him he writes you a cheque and hires

the bankster to save him the time and trouble. You shouldn’t even have to go to the bank; the bankster

the trip. This is a business matter between fiduciary and client and you are not a party to it. Yet, the bankster

will do anything to extort funds from you if she can con you into thinking that she is performing a service

cheque himself and hand you the cash. My guess is the client will tell the bankster that he wants to speak to

the manager to whom he’ll say, "I hired you to cash cheques for me. What am I paying you for?"

PART II

HOW IT HAPPENED

The Bankers Opt to Rule the World

There is afoot, a brilliant, albeit treacherous, scheme to control ALL the people and ALL the property of

ALL the world. I wish I’d thought of it. I did suspect it at a very young age but of course had no reason to

think I was so intuitive and accurate. Over the past 45 years, my suspicions have been corroborated,

evidenced, and in fact played out. One could say that I anticipated it and hence it became my reality, and I

shall expound upon this later, yet right now I intend to tell what is going on in order for you to have the

option of changing your mind about how you manage your commercial affairs. World domination via

confiscation of your $$$ is already on tap. England and the Rothschilds control the $$$ of every country

of the world and therefore its laws. Two hundred years ago, Governor Cornwallis said, "The US will bring

in the New World Order and its seat will be England."

FDR was giving us a ‘heads up’ on what is really going on. His head, along with that of every other

world leader, was/ is at the end of a gun. They are doing as they are told by the Zionist Illuminati Masonic

conspiracy/ Powers That Be (hereinafter PTB). What happened is all documented and if you investigate you

can find a plethora of information along with case law, codes, rules, regulations, statutes, legislation, etc. to

support my contentions. So as not to bog you down, I shall quote the sources of only the most significant.

Bretton Woods Agreement – 1944

This was the birth of the International Monetary Fund and from there all the foreign agencies – CIA,

FBI, IRS, BAR – control everything via the 14th Amendment citizen – those who contract to become US

citizens as opposed to remaining Sovereign Americans. The sole creation of these agencies was for the

purpose of collecting the debt. The USA is a corporation owned by England – the Crown – the Vatican.

The 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the USA was in order to enslave those who contracted with

the state, thereby giving up their natural-born freedoms in exchange for so-called benefits. Every ‘benefit’

you believe you receive from the state, whether US or Canada, is at a cost, huger than you could ever imagine

– unless you can keep it all separate as I have done. By contracting with thugs we hand over jurisdiction to

them and no longer have any claim to rights. Fortunately, it is easy to take back our rights by revoking,

rescinding, and canceling anything upon which we have written our ‘name’, ‘date of birth’, ‘socialist number

(SSN/SIN)’, and ‘signature’ which might have been construed by the state/ banksters as a contract. Even

having our post delivered to our house is considered a ‘government benefit’. I used General Delivery for a

period of four months after which time they intended to charge me. I discharged the charge yet it didn’t

work because I had requested this service. This creates a conundrum because I was forced to request it since

I didn’t want my mail delivered to my house – it is my personal policy not to reveal, to those who would

confiscate my rights and my labour, where I sleep at night. All this stopped bothering me when I realized I

can not be sued and no constabulary will dare to come to my house as I have confirmations of agreements

with several Canadian Ministers who ensure my rights and hence, my safety.

By the way, Elizabeth, of the family of Windsor (who changed the name to sound British instead of the

German royalty she is, but let’s not go there now) is not the Monarchy of Canada. HER MAJESTY QUEEN

ELIZABETH II is a corporation just like any other fiction. It is unfortunate, not to mention treasonous, that

all our politicians have sworn an oath to this foreign entity. Equally absurd is that Elizabeth, in her

Coronation, swore to uphold the Laws of God. What laws might those have been? I’d like to hear her list

them. There is none. Politicians’ oaths of allegiance to ‘the Queen’ are fraud and high treason.

Back to the gruesome story: All those industrialists, those bankers, whose names you’ve heard a million

times, Rockefellers, Rothschild, Morgan, etc. decided that owing the world would be a fun game since, they

probably had done everything else they ever wanted to do and were now bored. They devised a scheme to

control the world. Wouldn’t we all do this if we had the brains and the means? Well, they had and they did.

It was a simple case of bribing US politicians to overthrow their own money-creating system. Congress was

the creator of money and somehow congress was ‘talked into’(read ‘bribed’) handing this responsibility

over to a private corporation owned and operated by these banksters. Not to make them wrong – I might have

done this too if I’d thought of it – but they literally destroyed the united Sates of America and every country

which fell like dominoes thereafter once the corporation called USA was founded.

Registration vs. Recording

"Registration" comes from Latin "rex, regis" etc. meaning regal. So think about what occurs to

it releases legal title to the government corporation and leaves you with only equitable title – the right to use,

not own, and for that use you will pay a ‘use’ tax which is every tax, be it income, sin, sales, property, etc. as

property which you have registered they put it in a name which so much resembles your own that you won’t

your property with the public, you maintain your status as Title Owner. This is one of the most important

things you can ever learn for the sake of your commercial affairs.

The best example of the effects of registration is the birth certificate. A bankrupt entity – city, state/

province, country – cannot operate in commerce. So how do they manage? Since USA/CA have been

bankrupt for decades, having no substance such as gold and silver to back it, the only asset it has are men and

women and our labour. We are the collateral for the interest on the loan of the World Bank. Each of us is

registered, via the application for a birth certificate. The Treasury issues a bond on the birth certificate and the

bond is sold at a securities exchange and bought by the FRB/BoC, which then uses it as collateral to issue

bank notes. The bond is held in trust for the Feds at the Depository Trust Corporation. We are the surety on

said bonds. Our labour/energy is then payable at some future date. Hence we become the ‘transmitting

utility’ for the transmission of energy. The USG/CAG, in order to provide necessary goods and services,

created a commercial bond (promissory note), by pledging the property, labour, life and body of its citizens,

as payment for the debt (bankruptcy). This commercial bond made chattel (property) out of us all. We

became nothing more than ‘human resources’ and collateral for the debt. This was without our knowledge

and/or our consent, via the filing (registration) of our birth certificates. When mums apply for a birth

certificate, the application is registered. The legal title of her baby is then transferred from mum to the State.

Mum is left with equitable title of her baby whom she can use for a fee – a ‘use tax’ – and since the property

does not belong to her, she has to treat it in the manner which the owner wants.

Colonel Edward Mandell House is attributed with giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be

implemented to enslave the American people. He stated, in a private meeting with Woodrow Wilson

This is why I coach those who intend to ‘marry’ not to sign anything. Centuries ago, a man put a ring on

a woman’s finger and declared, "With this ring, I thee wed". Family members were the witnesses and that

because of the marriage licence. Do not invite into your private contract a third party which happens to be

public, cares not about the interests of the other two parties, and has every legal right to force them to

acquiesce to its demands. Your marriage ceases to be your own; the third party will tell you if and when you

can end the marriage; the third party will dictate that your children will:

1. require a birth certificate and SSN/SIN

2. require a gov’t-directed (AMA/CMA) doctor to attend to his health,

3. be vaccinated by mandate,

4. attend the Public Fool System,

5. be prescribed and drugged by Ritalin,

6. sign up with the armed forces, etc.

Your child will be a ‘ward of the state’ and the state will have prior say in what IT thinks is best for your

The birth certificate created a FICTION (the name of the baby in upper case letters). The state/ province

sells the birth certificate to the Commerce Department of the corporations of USA/CA, which in turn places a

bond on the birth certificate thereby making it a negotiable instrument, and placing the fiction, called a

STRAWMAN, into the warehouse of the corporations of USA/CA. Representation for the created fiction

was given to the BAR (British Accredited Registry/Regency), owned and operated by the Crown, for the

purpose of contracting the fiction (which most of us think is ourselves) into a third party action. Do not

underestimate the power behind this trick. It is to con us into contracting with the feds so that they can

Because there is no full disclosure – we are never told that we have just signed away what we believe to be

the feds from selling securities (our property) belongs to us and must go into a fund for our benefit,

otherwise it would be fraud. Not wanting to be charged with fraud, the feds had to create a remedy for us ...

and hope we wouldn’t discover it.

For decades, through its ‘public’ school system, the government has managed to deceive us about some

very important facts. All facets of the media (print, radio, television) have an ever-increasing influence in our

lives and are controlled by government and its agencies, via the issuance of licences. We have slowly and

systematically been led to believe that any form of our names represents us, which is not so.

History of the World

All problems, depressions, wars, disasters, assassinations – ALL of them were planned, caused,

instigated, and implemented by the International Banksters and their attempt to establish a central bank in

every country in the world, which they have now done, thanks to corrupt politicians who have been bought

and paid for. This is all you need to know about the history of the world. John Fitzgerald Kennedy, who

issued silver certificates, and Abraham Lincoln, who issued treasury notes (greenbacks), were the only men

The International Bankers were relentless in setting up central banks, which the uSA resisted for decades

because their system was working – no debt money. They realized the phenomenal profit to be had by

printing their own notes, threatening congress to accept this private banking system, then lending $$$ at

extortive interest rates (e.g.: the graduated income tax – the second plank of the Communist Manifesto).

They demanded that the interest on the money they lent the government was to be paid in gold, hence, when

the gov’t ran out of gold (there is no gold in Fort Knox – it was handed over to the Bank of England for the

interest on the loan), it had to find some form of asset to use as collateral for the loans which it claimed to

continue to need. But for what? Not much revenue is required for the true federal functions, namely: a navy,

international and interstate trade and commerce, and the general welfare of all. The rest is extortion.

What could they use if there were no more gold? Ah! – The citizens themselves ... but ... we are a

sovereign people. How can we be held as assets for a debt which wasn’t real? We can’t – at least not

lawfully. We can however, be tricked into believing that we are responsible for the debt by transforming us

into accommodation parties to a fictional entity (strawman) created by the government. In a circuitous and

living".

You are probably wondering how in God’s name this ever came about. It doesn’t really matter, yet, here

was the beginning of the modern era’s financial, political, social, commercial, and military strife and

subversion. – perfecteconomy.com

leading U.S. economist, New York Times, Sept. 5, 1929

James Madison

What we need to know is the results: unjust taxation, multiplying home costs, increased medical costs,

control of energy and resources, control of elections and political principles, and the undermining of every

social process by multiplying cost. The central banks, via the IMF/World Bank, have engulfed the world in a

mathematically impossible debt-based debt/credit monetary system.

Thirty-some-odd years ago, a high school student loosely formed a concept of mathematically perfected

economy. In 1979 he published a mathematical proof that any economy conveyed by a currency subject to

interest, ultimately terminates itself under insoluble debt.

When Albert Einstein was asked what was the most fantastic thing he ever realized in all his studies, he

The Federal Reserve Bank is now in every country in the world – in Canada it is known as the Bank of

Canada. The banksters are diabolical, unethical, ignoble, unconscionable, dishonourable, dastardly tyrants.

Not to stoop to name-calling but it is exigent that you comprehend the insidiousness of their scheme and

us in penury. I know not one single soul who is not obsessed to some degree with money or the lack thereof,

money’, meaning we are never free of it – if only of the concept of it.

So, the focus of everything we ever learned in history class was immaterial and irrelevant; the facts may

be accurate but as you’ll see later, facts are immaterial; all that matters is honour/dishonour, contract, and

credit/debit. We are entrenched in a game of commerce about which we have been kept in the dark for the

purpose of our slavery. There may be a few centuries in the history of the world which were not about

commerce, but certainly the past two millennia have been for the purpose of enslaving the masses for the

profits and lifestyles of the global elite. It is nearly completely in place.

I always suspected the banking system was fraudulent. It was simply a case of noticing the tallest, most

lavish buildings in any city were bank buildings. One needn’t be particularly astute to see what’s happening.

When I read Thoren’s book I was elated to discover I was accurate and yet disheartened to realize ... I was

accurate.

Reserve Bank

So, here is what we have today: A banking system controlled by a handful of private interests; the

government with the ability to impoverish and terrorize productive people by controlling their take home pay

and profits; a secret police bureau to track, harass, and occasionally murder dissenters while covering up the

crimes of the elite; and a policy of social engineering in which the federal government actively forms public

opinion.

It is vitally important to understand how those in government turned our lives upside down and made us

believe that we are subject under them; when in reality they are subject to us. Approximately the same thing

occurred in Canada, only later, which means that when America falls, the provinces will be not far behind.

1865 – 13th Amendment – people could volunteer into slavery by accepting federal benefits.

1871 – the Federal Gov’t formed itself into a corporation – USA. I don’t know CANADA’s date of

incorporation.

1913 – the Federal Reserve Central Banks were created.

1933 President Roosevelt put into effect the ‘Trading with the Enemies Act’. This applied only to

Federal Citizens.

1933 – President Roosevelt took the gold away from the people, who were not lawfully required to

relinquish it, and who then had no money with which to pay their debts.

March 9, 1933 – ownership (legal title) of all property is in the State; individual ‘ownership’ is only

equitable (user) title. Use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.

(YIKES! Read that again.)

1933 – President Roosevelt passed HJR 192 June 5, 1933 – since the government had taken the gold,

and the people had no money, the government would pay the ‘debts’ for the people, thereby giving them

you a certain form of currency, since any form and all forms of currency are your credit. If they do, they are

in breach of Public Policy, PL 73-10. Not only does this insurance policy protect the legislators from

conviction for fraud and treason but also it protects the people from damages cause by the Feds.

be cited in cases.

1946 – government and court system was lost through the Administrative Procedures Act.

1965 – silver was removed as a means for paying debt, the Uniform Commercial Code became the

supreme law of the land concerning the Banking System, the courts were pulled together in Admiralty/

Administrative and Civil (contract /commercial /corporate) Law, thereby removing the ‘innocent’ plea,

thereby reversing ‘innocent until proven guilty’ to ‘guilty until proven innocent’. Securities replaced

substance as collateral for debts; debt instruments with collateral, and accommodation parties could be used

instead of money. The courts could uphold the security instruments which depended upon commercial

fictions as a basis for compelling payment or performance.

1966 – The Federal Tax Lien Act: The entire taxing and monetary systems are hereby placed under the

U.C.C. (Uniform Commercial Code)

Since the declaration of bankruptcy, when our bodies and labour were pledged to pay for it, they stripped

we have unwittingly entered into adhesion contracts, albeit without full disclosure to the terms and conditions,

thereby making them invalid and fraudulent; however, we are still bound to the terms until we undo the

damage by rebutting the presumption. Statutes of Commerce – the UCC/ PPSA and all connected with it –

Bills of Exchange Act, Conveyance and Law of Property Act, Courts of Justice Act – replaced laws for

natural beings with statutes for fictional entities. But we can not play a fictitious game; we need fictitious

entities to play. So the gov’t created that game-token for us – the Strawman – and they tricked us by making

the name of the Strawman appear to be the name that represents us. This is so we will think that it is we of

‘resident’. ‘person’ within the game applies to a fictional, non-existent, corporate, artificial, governmentcreated

use to represent us.

The entity to which the statutes refer and apply is always ‘person’ or ‘persons’. However, we know that

this entity is a government-created fiction and does not exist. The feds/banksters have surreptitiously and

carefully put the name of this corporate fiction into upper case letters to differentiate it from the real, flesh

and blood living soul yet also to con us into believing it is we. This distinction is of paramount importance.

Since we know that the corporation is the upper case name and that statutes apply only to corporations, and

we know that statutes always use the word ‘person’ to describe to whom the statute applies, then we can

conclude that ‘person’ is a corporation and not a living soul. We are not ‘persons’. Statutes do not apply to

us. Only ‘laws’ apply to us; yet there is only one law so its easy for us to remember: "we must not infringe

upon the rights, life, liberty, or property of another living soul." If we do, the living soul whom we have

injured can file a witnessed, sworn complaint with the court and a jury will decide if that claim against us is

legitimate and deal with us accordingly. What is going on in the ‘courts’ today is that the Strawman – the

government-created corporation – is being charged with a crime based upon violation of a statute. This would

be OK if we weren’t being held as surety for that entity which couldn’t possibly have done anything wrong

the state with any crime because all crimes are commercial .... and Commerce is an unreal situation in which

anything which requires a meeting of the minds, e.g.: contract, or any of the senses of a living soul – hearing,

were never meant to operate in commerce.

The legal use of words is vastly different from normal English usage, the best example being when thenpresident

Bill Clinton said, "That depends on what the definition of ‘is’ is." We all laughed, yet Black’s

Law Dictionary has eighteen (18) different meanings of the word ‘is’. Check every document which you

As fictitious entities cannot contract with natural beings, a transmitting utility is required for the

connexion. The Strawman is the transmitting utility. So all contracts are between the Strawman and the

case: Penhallow vs. Doanes Administrators – 1795

Through the public fool system, the media, and other alleged ‘authorities’ in our lives we have been

name. It is not. The purpose of the Strawman name is to trick us into believing that we are the surety for any

obligation/contract involving the Strawman. Since the feds created the Strawman, they control it and it is

subject to its codes, rules, regulations, statutes, ordinances, by-laws, and legislation. Private entities/sovereigns

are not. If we are unaware of this we can be tricked into being held as surety for debts, liabilities, and

obligations of the Strawman.

If we ‘capture’ our Strawman by recording with the public its name via a Financing Statement – the one

contract in the world which can’t be broken – (UCC-1 / PPSA – go to your Secretary of State website /

subject to the feds; it is now under our control. We can also claim our birth certificate, which is the original

title to the Strawman and so discharge and hence release us, the living souls, from any debt, liability, or

obligation of the Strawman. All these debts exist only on paper, in a digital venue, in computers, in a fictional

commercial world. They are not real, although the banksters would have us think so. Now, the property of the

living soul is tax exempt and free from any levy.

Look at your birth certificate and you’ll notice that the ‘Registration’ date’ i.e.: the birth of the strawman,

is about two weeks after your alleged birth. You can’t be certain of the date of your birth because you do not

have first-hand knowledge of it unless you personally documented it the day you were born... not likely,

though, eh? If your mum told you your birthdate it is only hearsay. I tell my younger son that he hasn’t a

clue of the date he was born – mostly because I had lied to the school about it and so, in order to promote the

ruse, I had to celebrate his birthday on the day I claimed he was born. The poor boy has no idea of his real

birthdate and because of this he is safer from the feds.

Accept for Value and Return for Discharge, Settlement, and Closure

Fictional government can only function in a fictional commercial world – one where there is no real

money, only fictional funds ... mere entries, figures, digits. All charges are a negative, commercial claim

against the Strawman, not against us. Only the numbers move from one side of the account to the other –

credit and debit. Our resisting these fictitious charges only gets us into trouble, so we accept them and

discharge the charge, thereby balancing the account. Accepting the charge also removes the controversy, as I

did with MBNA; there is then nothing to adjudicate so it can’t go to court. Accepting for Value the charge

also allows us to remove the negative claim against the account thereby becoming the holder in due course of

Playing the Commerce Game as opposed to what most think is the Legal Game allows us to control the

who would confiscate our labour in the form of cash. Now, no statutes, codes, rules, regulations apply to us;

they apply only to the Strawman of whom we now have control. So the feds have no jurisdiction over us, as

they have not our consent, nor are we within their fictional, commercial venue. Those of us who opt to take

charge of our commercial affairs become part of the solution instead of remaining part of the problem.

In order to get one's liberty and independence back, one must first secure the title and ownership of the

Strawman. Once one controls the straw man, then one controls the rights of the property that the strawman

acquires. For one to regain title to his body the Birth Certificate must be secured. After we have redeemed it

and filed public notice via a financing statement, then we have the right of property ownership through our

Strawman whom we now control. The bond created and sold in the market place for the Strawman now

becomes our property.

Think of the board game Monopoly®™ where you pick up a ‘Chance’ card which reads, "Pay School

Tax $150", so you hand over the $$$ to the ‘banker’. (I think the Parker boys were trying to tell us

something.) When the government charges the Strawman a tax we, the ostensible ‘players’, are held as

‘surety’ for our token/Strawman and ‘required to pay’ even though the charge is not directed towards us. It

We used to be able to live real life with real money. Now we are playing a game with Monopoly money.

We have been prevented from living real life; we are caught in a game. This did not come about by our

conscious agreement. What if we want to go back to living real life? We’d have to get out of the game. This

is tricky because the powers-that-be are capable of controlling us through confiscating our finances by

keeping us in the game. Why would they allow us to opt out of a game which they are sure to win and which

we are destined to lose? There is no way to stop playing the game unless we consciously do what it takes in

order to extricate ourselves from the game. It is simple but not easy, mostly because the banksters refuse to

play a game we can’t win. Would anyone consciously choose to play such a game?

The UCC is the rules of the game and any entity within that game is ‘corporate’, since no living soul can

play this game, only Strawmen. Therefore, the Income Tax Act, being part of the Commerce Game, applies

confiscation of funds, they hold us, who want only to live life as freely as possible and ‘not infringe upon the

Resolution 192 of June 5, 1933, and in Canada, Order in Council No. 16 of April 10, 1933 – tells us that as

there is no substance with which to ‘pay’ a debt, then all debt must be ‘discharged’. How can we ‘pay’ a

debt when there is nothing with which to ‘pay’. We can’t; so all we can do is discharge it. Since there is no

money, then the only thing left is credit, so we must ‘pay’ a debt with credit. How is credit created? VIA

must have a lot of credit. Are we using it? Or is some public entity using it? Every time we sign our name for

any public purpose to any public entity, we are giving away our exemption. What are we getting in return?

Example: If you go through a Stop sign, it is not you who is charged; it is your Strawman, because it is

doesn’t exist, it is you who is held as surety for the fine. Slick game, eh? I hear you saying, "but it was I

who broke the law by going through the Stop sign." What law? Remember, there is no law other than the

one which protects the life, liberty, rights, and property of all living souls. So, you didn’t break any law,

unless of course someone were injured, in which case I trust that, as an honourable soul, you would

somehow make restitution.

To this end I have posted a bond with the Minister of Transport in the event of an incident in which I

might have to compensate another being. I will not pay a federally-owned corporation called an insurance

agent to "protect" me. My uncle used to say, "Protect me from the Protectors." The bond is backed by my

exemption which is unlimited. Which is better? – slave-labouring to pay an insurance premium to an entity

which might not cover your transgressions or might cancel your policy on a whim – or backing any

commercial liability with your own unlimited exemption via a surety bond? I say the latter is safer.

Soon we will again become ‘insurance’ for one another. When the farmer’s barn burned down his

neighbours assisted him in rebuilding it, based upon their anticipation of needing assistance themselves from

neighbouring farmers – "good insurance". The banksters infiltrated this workable plan by creating an

insurance industry in the same manner they infiltrated the people’s trade by creating a debt-money system.

"You now have to use our money/ insurance companies instead of relying upon yourselves and your

neighbours, but its going to cost you." Who fell for this? Why would anyone put his trust into a fictional

entity when he has trusted his neighbours for decades? I wouldn’t.

Back to the traffic case. What actually occurred and for which you are being held for the charge against

your Strawman is that you violated a statute. The statute applies only to fictitious entities and since a

believe that it is you who made the transgression. But no statute applies to living souls, any more than ‘Go to

the token race car.

Too many of us are in fear. I notice that this fear translates into $$$. I’ve asked enough people of all

ages if they could have what they want, they generally respond, "More money". When people have what

getting a second job or getting another member of the family out to work, or borrowing $$$, in order to

?" If they did, the answer they came up with is the one with which we are programed every day, which is,

"Can/Ams are spending way beyond their means and going into serious debt." This is utterly FALSE.

to put a bandaid upon the effect instead of investigating the cause.

NONE of what you have been led to believe about ‘national or personal debt’ is true. You have been

conned by the masterminds of banking. I ask you again to keep in the back of your mind that this is ALL by

design – a brilliant design to confiscate the property, land, cash, assets, and the ostensible intrinsic value of

the people of the world – our labour – for the sole purpose of controlling us.

‘Loans’

When you entered into a loan contract with a bank, you signed a note or contract promising to pay back

the bank and you agreed to provide collateral which the bank could seize if you did not repay the loan. This

contract supposedly qualified you to receive the bank’s money. The bank either sells or hypothecates your

Banks are prohibited from lending their ‘own money’ from their own assets, or from other depositors.

So from where did the $$$ come? The contract we signed (our promissory note) was converted into a

‘negotiable instrument’ by the bank and became an asset on the bank’s accounting books. According to the

UCC 1-201(24) and 3-104, it was our signature on the note which made it $$$.

Our promissory note (‘money’) was taken, recorded as an asset of the bank, and sold by the bank for

cash without ‘equal valuable consideration’ given to us for our note. The bank gave us a deposit slip as a

receipt for the money we gave them, just as the bank would normally provide when we make a deposit to the

bank. It then created an account at the bank which would contain this $$$ which we just created. A check on

this account was issued with our signature and this account is the source of funds behind the cheque which

we received as a ‘loan’.

seller, in order to raise an asset for itself, and also used the face value of our note as ‘principal’ which it

claims it ‘lent’ us and against which it charged interest. Consideration on the part of the bank is non-existent

enforceable contract and the note was obtained from us via fraud, the entire transaction/ contract is fraudulent.

In the Ashley case of 1988, fraud on the part of the bank was proven because the defendant revealed,

"the banks told me they had ‘money’ to lend and they didn’t."

the mortgage contract/note to the bank prior to their giving us the funds. So, the application for the loan

created the funds (it has our signature on it) and the note (with our signature) covered the funds to ‘repay’

the loan. Again, constructive fraud.

My sons’ father obtained a ‘loan’ in 1972 in the amount of $46,000 USD to purchase a house. Since he

continues to be the principal on the note and since the note continues to earn interest, including the fact that

he ‘repaid’ the loan, his equity is now worth over $5,000,000 USD. We are, as I write, in the process of

continue to pay the bank that which it never lent you, you’ll now be paying me – maybe this will make you

feel a bit better about it.

Fraudulent National Debt

Wars are major debt creators, which is what the banksters want – as much debt as possible – in order to

WW1. This is the true purpose of war and yet the people bought the ruse of either humanitarianism or

worse, ‘making the world safe for democracy’, which is the most frightful system of government. All the

players are manipulated by the banksters. They play both sides. The reason the banksters want democracy is

because that is the only form of gov’t which they can manipulate and control under Law Merchants. Every

democracy the world has known ends in an economic downward spiral. Don’t get me wrong about tyrannical

dictatorships or archaic monarchies, however, when a regime is forced to change to a democracy it dies

Since we use debt notes to ‘purchase’, which denotes having only equitable title (‘buy’ denotes having

legal title) then all we’re doing is passing along the debt and increasing the interest with each transaction.

This is precisely the agenda of the banksters. This is the classic "the rich get richer and the poor get

poorer". It is they who get the taxes and it is we who get the notes which we are trying to spend before they

become completely devalued. Whenever anyone is offered the ‘package deal’, which is so common these

days, thanks to lay-offs and downsizing, not to mention ‘outsourcing’, they ‘take the money and run’. Good

strategy. Do not continue working; do not look back. Get out while you can and get doing something worth

your time and energy.

I suspect that when one is laid-off, it is not because the company can no longer afford to pay you your

salary; it is because of their cost of your ‘benefits’. Remember that ‘benefits’ are already ours, because

everything we could ever need or want is pre-paid, but we have been led to believe that said benefits are

‘privileges’, not rights, and therefore, we are slave-labouring for them. Our labour is off-set by our

paycheque which we fund via our signature/ exemption; yet it is the so-called ‘benefits’ which the

corporations can no longer afford because it is a real cost to them. Why do you suppose the ‘package deal

has access long after you are gone because they still have your SSN/SIN. If you are ever told you are being

laid-off, try suggesting that you will work for "salary only, no benefits". I don’t really think this will change

their tune, only because you are a drop in the bucket, however, you might see their eyes go for a swim,

presuming they are onto the scam, which, let’s face it, anyone who works in ‘Human Resources’ is not privy

to this scam or they wouldn’t be wasting their days in HR – I like to think.

The Federal Reserve Bank is privately owned by several private investors (Global Elitists). Their purpose

is to manipulate financially the transfer of ostensibly ‘privately owned’ property back to themselves. Federal

Reserve funds are not backed by any substance, yet, based upon bookkeeping entries, the currency can be

moved thereby making the people slaves to this system. Their true income from this unlawful debt-money

system is the interest from fictional loans.

In 1990, I read the Truth in Money Book by Theodore R. Thoren who claims that the national debt is an

illusion because the interest on the debt created by this debt-money system under which we slave is

unpayable; it simply accumulates endlessly. In order to force this system upon the people, the feds permitted

the people to own gold.

Economic Freedom

Since all the (government-educated) financial advisors suggest buying gold in order to survive the

coming depression, I suggest that if you think precious metals will save your life ... then buy silver.

The Media

Hitler's propaganda minister

Rockefeller, founder of, and in an address before, the Trilateral Commission, in June of 1991

former President of CBS News

an address to fellow journalists.

from The Golden Age

All media are negative, untruthful, and unreliable. Whatever information you get, about what is going on

in the world, from TV, radio, newspapers, magazines, school, or the government, you can count on the

opposite being the truth. They all ought to be required to file an affidavit stating: "Under full commercial

liability, I claim the following to be true, correct, complete, and not misleading". But why not just let the

whore media be whores and just know that this is what they do? Its their nature. Media appeal to our ego

minds; they align with our fears which motivate us. As long as we are aware of this, we can choose not to be

influenced. Be aware that most of the media are controlled by just a few. Use discernment. Why is this

About a year ago, my son apprised me that Michael Jackson was all over the news for the entire day. I

asked him why he thought this was the only event on TV. I explained that there must be something going on

in the world and that this was a red herring meant to draw our attention away from something vastly more

significant. I learned later that G W Bush had been in London where there were huge protests against the

Michael Jackson.

Advertising

I want to stop wanting what they want me to want.

Don’t you think that the deluge of advertising in schools is because major corporations have determined

that their biggest and best market is children? What better way to sink families than by parents believing they

are denying their children if they don’t get them what they want? Its one thing to deny ourselves, yet we all

remember that.

Here’s a rule of thumb on buying your children what they will ‘die without’. If it will enrich their lives

by offering them a unique experience then we want them to have this experience; however, if they want

something because they will be more acceptable, accumulate more friends, placate their desire to ‘look good’,

‘be popular’, fill a hole in them which ought to be filled by something else – like parental attention, for

example – you can pretty much forget about it.

We have been programmed to want not only worthless items but also the pieces of paper, of no intrinsic

value, which, we have also been programmed to believe, will get us as many worthless items as we desire and

the more we have the happier we’ll be. We can learn to manifest what we want and forget about manifesting

believe it will ‘buy’ for us. Why be subject to this confusion which the banksters are constantly feeding us?

We are connected to our source. Let’s use that power instead of ‘money’ to get what we want. More on this

later.

Complicity (vs. Conspiracy)

When we are privy to any information and we choose to ignore it and remain uninvolved, our choice

evaporates because the information itself is what involves us. The choice becomes whether we want to remain

part of the problem or become part of the solution. There is no fence-sitting in life. We cannot be aware of

what is going on and not do any opting. One who ignores what is going on justifies this by pretending he

doesn’t have the information he now has. We can’t unlearn anything; we can only change our minds about

something based upon what we have learned. There is no going back. The information in this book clashes

with the belief system of most of the people on this planet. They uninvolve themselves by calling it

"conspiracy theory". This makes it more difficult for our true selves to do anything about it. They get to

remain in their comfort zones from which I contend we are required to remove ourselves.

When I hear, "I don’t believe in conspiracy theories", what I hear is, "I’ve made up my mind based

upon what I’ve been told to think by the Media Mafia conspiring to propagandize via TV, radio, and

theories – the ones they’ve been fed. If what they believe, i.e.: what they’ve been told to think, were true, they

wouldn’t need to believe it. Belief is of the ego mind and hence, false. When we know something is true, we

don’t need to involve our egos. This is why we don’t really have much emotional attachment to the truth. It

just is. When people become emotional about a subject I know they only ‘believe’ it. This usually comes up

around religious or political beliefs. They are protecting their programming which has settled into the ego

emotional response. Those who have certainty, which is from their experience, have no emotional charge on

it. Arguing, by definition, is a reaction of the ego. This is why no one wins an argument. There is no win

"accompliceship; partnership in guilt" .

The word "theory" means premise yet to be proven. So when one puts it all together, "I don’t believe

also accused of being a ‘cynic’.

I’m also accused of being a pessimist, yet pessimism is great. I am not distressed about what is about to

occur in the world; I look forward to the shift that must take place if we are to escape our prison. Besides,

according to Thomas Szasz, pessimists are more often correct. Also, we get to be either ‘right’ or ‘happy’ –

‘right’ when things turn out as bad, or ‘happy’ when they don’t. Optimists are either ‘right’ or ‘worried’ –

happily right when things turn out as good yet confused and distraught when they do not. From an emotional

perspective, I have never been happier now that I am certain that there is going to be major upheaval. I

welcome it – we must wake up from this nightmare and trust our spirit.

Usury

If I borrow your car and the gas tank is full, how can I return to you more car than I borrowed. I can’t

because it doesn’t exist.

There is only so much cash available. Someone, somewhere knows precisely how much is in circulation.

According to Ron Supinski, of the Public Information Department in San Francisco Federal Reserve Bank

claims that FRNs are backed by the power of congress to collect taxes. It costs the FRB 2¢ to print a $100

note – a rather good return, I’d say. Isn’t this about a 500,000 % profit? ... and this doesn’t include the

interest they put on the note EACH time it is passed – presuming those in receipt of said note are declaring it

as ‘income’ and hence feel obliged to pay tax/interest on it. Since what we think is ‘money’ is borrowed into

existence, meaning that it simply doesn’t exist until someone puts a signature to some numbers on a

promissory note, how can interest be paid? It does not exist. If I borrow into existence (ie: create) $10,000,

and this is all that exists, which has to be true because it doesn’t exist until I sign the note with this number

on it, where am I going to get the 10% interest to cover the cost of the loan? Borrowing ‘money’ into

existence, meaning ‘creating debt funds’, is like drinking sea water. It seems to work temporarily, but the

resulting thirst by far exceeds any available means to compensate.

There is NO ‘Money’

Powerful industrialists and bankers essentially bribed the politicians in almost every country of the world

into giving up their Constitutionally-protected right to print notes for the Treasury. They handed that power

over to a private corporation which issued notes called Federal Reserve Notes – not ‘federal’, no ‘reserves’

(well, maybe 10%), and not a true ‘note’ – they are ‘debt notes’. This can be difficult to understand. What

That debt can be created only by an equally non-existent entity. This causes ping pong balls to go jumping

around in your head, doesn’t it? This non-existent entity is the ‘public’. First, make the distinction that we

are the private and all corporations, bureaucracies, governments, etc. are the public – they do not exist except

on paper.

There is no money. There was, once upon a time – for example, Colonial Script, gold and silver,

Lincoln’s Greenbacks, Kennedy’s Silver Certificates. Did you notice that both those presidents were

assassinated for creating notes which were not based upon debt? The banksters didn’t like this. They had a

monopoly on the currency and weren’t about to let anyone cheat them out of their con game.

We neither spend ‘money’, nor are we paid ‘money’. It doesn’t exist. Any ‘money’ you think you

have in the form of cash is borrowed the second you put your signature to anything – a cheque, withdrawal

slip, an application, a contract. These requests for your signature are ALL for the SOLE purpose of creating

When we ‘borrow money’ from a bank, which seems to be the only entity from which we can borrow,

our signature upon a ‘promise to pay’ is not only what gets us the loan but also what immediately repays the

loan. Did the bank lend us money? No. There is no money. It didn’t lend ‘money’, it exchanged the credit

we created for bank promissory notes. I watch people’s eyes glaze over when I mention this concept so think

of this:

I take my credit card over to Sears and purchase $100 worth of goods. I sign on the line which states, "I

when the USA declared bankruptcy and who knows when in Canada (since Canada was on and off the gold

standard for some time after the uSA fell to the banksters) public policy (in the uSA: HJR 192 of June 5,

1933, and in Canada, Order in Council No. 16, April 10, 1933) has dictated that since there is nothing of

feds. Those who hold the gold pay the debt. The only way to do this is to sign a note with the number

attached to it. It is a promissory note – the same as that which we sign in a bank just before we are told they

won’t lend us cash.

I have asked ‘loan officers’ why they won’t just hand over to me the cash which we’ve just agreed I was

going to borrow. They say, "I don’t have the cash right here; I’ll give you a cheque which you can take over

to the teller and she’ll either deposit it into your account from which you can then withdraw cash, or you can

just cash the cheque." I ask, "If its right over there with the teller, why can’t you go over for me and get the

promise to pay $10,000 plus interest for ... $10,000, not a piece of paper with numbers and a date on it. Why

time we sign anything, we are creating credit, rather, bringing forth our unlimited credit, and if for some

reason we don’t receive this credit, count on the fact that someone else did – by stealing our exemption. To

boot, we have agreed to it – take a look at the (unilateral and hence, unenforceable) contract, whether it is your

driver’s licence or your credit card application. Your exemption is being stolen through your signature. It is

worth a fortune. Time to take control, eh?

Let’s get back to Sears. When I went into the store for the goods and I made payment, in whatever form,

what did I get for my payment? No, not the goods; I got a receipt. The direct exchange was signature for

receipt. The goods were already mine; I just came to collect them. So, the merchant is happy because I signed

for the goods; i.e.: he exchanged goods for my signature which that day was worth $100, so his accounts are

balanced. He doesn’t see that he exchanged his receipt for my signature. My books are balanced because I

exchanged my signature for his receipt, I also happened to get the goods, which were pre-paid. Then, the

merchant sends to the bank, my signature along with the hundreds of others which he gathered that day. The

substance) and send it over to Sears; it transferred to Sears, by the clicking of computer keys (Electronic

Funds Transfer), the amount of credit matching, and hence balancing the amount of, the credit slips. I’ll say it

again, because it is so stunning: NO MONEY ever left the bank to PAY Sears. The next thing I know I get a

bill from VISA for $100. For what? I’ve already ‘paid’ – at least to the extent of my ability. Public Policy

has dictated that this is all I can do. How do you want to ‘pay’ for goods which are already yours? Via

working forty hours a week? Or via your signature, thereby giving them your tax exemption?

Its important that we see the fraudulent banking system as rather outside of normal reality; sort of a

middle-man. We ought to work for what we need – a direct exchange. Who deceived us into believing that

This signature is what creates the amount of funds mentioned on the cheque. Since these funds are debt

funds we just created more debt. Actually, we created the credit against which the entity, which handed you

the cheque, will create a matching debt – yet, essentially, we are responsible for the creation of this alleged

‘debt’ because, since there is interest on debt funds, we climbed deeper into an inescapable chasm. The bank

hands us other pieces of paper which we take out into the market place. Although you believe you bought

goods with these debt notes you can’t possibly own these goods because you gave nothing of substance in

exchange. All you did was double the debt.

The $300,000 invoice for your house is based upon liability funds. If you hand over $300,000 in

FRN/BCN you have not discharged or zeroed the debt; you have made the debt $600,000. You do not own

anything for which you have not exchanged something of substance. You have only equitable title. Legal title

can change hands only upon direct exchange (no middle man) of something of substance, ie: your labour. If

you labour and you are given liability funds and you trade them for something, it vitiates not only your

labour but also that which you think you bought. Why not simply labour for what you want? Labour is real

nothing. You have been programmed into believing you need money. Au contraire, it is money which keeps

us from having what we want. The more ‘money’ we have, the more debt we have. WHY do we think we

want ‘money’?

I become quite perturbed when I hear a ‘financial advisor’ suggest, "Get out of debt!". Listeners

presume he means, "Pay off your debt" and this is not what he means – well, maybe it is, yet, if so it is

because he doesn’t know. Once I heard Suze Ormond talk. After 30 seconds I screamed, "AARRRGH!"

and walked away. Don’t listen to these government-educated ‘experts’. "Get out of debt" means to

discharge the debt and quit accumulating debt notes. It also means to put those things which you have slave-

laboured to acquire, into Your Name. He who dies with the most cash LOSES. Cash represents your labour

and the amount of cash you have in your possession represents the worthlessness of your labour.

How can we repay more than exists? Only our labour can begin to do this, so the banksters capture our

labour in the form of taxes. They give us some of the proceeds of our labour for the purpose of keeping us

politicians to enrich themselves). When one takes into consideration all these taxes – direct and indirect,

excise and impost: income (federal, state/provincial, and local), sales, GST, Sin taxes (alcohol, tobacco),

permits (firearm, building, septic, well), endless banking service fees (credit cards, stocks, bonds, accounts...),

endless fines and penalties (traffic, invoice late fees...), travel (flight, hotel, rental), capital gains, corporate

income, court costs, licences (marriage, dog, hunting, fishing, driving, piloting, all professional, all business),

insurance (property, life, medical, vehicle, employment, workers compensation), fuel permit, gasoline (about

37%), inheritance, inventory, IRS/CRA interest and penalty charges (tax on top of tax), luxury, property, real

estate, social security/Canada pension, truckers road usage, registration fees (birth, all professions, all

vehicles), school, sports, communication (TV, cable/satellite, internet, fax, endless telephone service fees

(universal, federal, state/prov., and local charges, surcharges, minimum usage.... ) tolls (road, bridge, tunnel),

utility (water, gas, electricity, garbage), and the biggest, most insidious of them all: inflation which is tax on

the ‘money’ itself, .... breathe .... we are being taxed well beyond any bracket which we might have

previously estimated. If you add it up, and no one can do this and remain sane, you will see that 85% of your

labour is going to ‘pay’..... NOTHING. No, you are not paying to keep your country functioning. You are

paying to make rich the politicians who have tricked you into believing their scam. Worse, I am sorry to

report, by "paying your taxes" you are contributing to child abuse. The IMF uses your taxes to terrorize,

impoverish, and starve children. If you want details on this please read books by David Icke or Cathy

O’Brian’s book, The Trance Formation of America, because it makes me too crazy to think about never mind

write.

People still think, for some absurd reason, that the game the politicians play, called ‘legislation’ or ‘lawmaking’,

we make rules in our own homes or communal groups, do the politicians abide by our rules? No. Should

they have to? No, so why would we possibly think that their rules apply to us?

A friend once justified her paying income tax by saying, "I consider the income tax just rent for living in

this country." I told her, "This is tantamount to paying rent to live in a house you already OWN." A true

government’s purpose is solely to serve us and protect our inherent rights; we owe it nothing.

You are labouring to pay for something that is unpayable – interest on a loan which you lent them. It is

unpayable for several reasons:

1. the loan itself was not of substance so how can you repay something that never existed (except on

paper) in the first place?

2. the energy for the interest does not exist since all the ‘money’ exists only on paper, and there is no

more than that because it was lent into existence. So how can there be any more ‘money’ with which to pay

interest than what already doesn’t exist. I know this sounds convoluted and you get to be right about that; it

IS convoluted. This is how this scam has managed to stay alive – go back to Hitler’s comment about the

bigger the lie, the easier it is to sell.

The best example of how they turned the tables on us is your depositing into your bank account funds

upon which you hoped to earn some interest and finding out that on your next statement, rather than paying

you interest on the deposit (funds you lent the bank so it could lend out at a higher rate of interest than they

agreed to pay you), they are charging you the interest; and in fact this is precisely what is occurring in the

form of ‘service fees’. You can see how desperate the gov’t is about getting funds to pay the interest on the

loan which the banksters lent them. Banksters make loan sharks look like nice guys. Loan sharks only

smash your knee-caps; banksters hold you in slavery your entire life. The only reason you tolerate this is

because they allow you some pleasures in life, yet, at a huge cost.

Its rather like the frog in the tepid water who stays until it boils and then he dies, only because he doesn’t

the devaluation of ‘money’ – that has encroached upon us at rather a slow rate. However, the feds, now in

panic, have expedited the process because the banksters are about to call in the loans if they are not paid, and

the plan for global control is upon us.

Whenever someone takes a ‘loan’ from a financial institution, the signed promissory note is ‘deposited’

to the bank's credit. The bank then issues a cheque to the borrower. The bank’s books are now balanced.

When the bank deposits this to the asset side of its ledger the bank is indebted to the borrower. In other

words, the borrower actually originates the credit so he winds up paying back, with interest, what he

involved, the bank stands to confiscate this property if the ‘borrower’/ creator of the credit does not pay back

over three (3!) times the amount of his own creation. The entity which is entitled to the pay-back of

‘borrowed’ funds is always the ‘principal’ and that is you – the creator of the funds.

The property which you think you own (and this includes your body) already belongs to the IMF and

soon they will make this known by asking for proof of title which you cannot evidence. Birth Certificates are

only evidence that the Title of Origin (legal title) rests elsewhere. You do NOT have legal title to your body,

unless you have claimed it. This is why you are not permitted to put particular substances into it. When the

feds become desperate enough they will come for all your property, including your body. They will demand

all collateral ‘now’. Its nothing personal; its just business.

This is the reason that more people every day are in (debtor’s) prison. All crime is commercial in nature.

This is the reason for more and more traffic citations: the police are no longer peace officers; their role now

is ‘revenue/ tax collector’. This is their job. Don’t let them kid you about why they want you to wear your

which you will earn/ pay over your lifetime, not to mention save the insurance companies (also corporate/

non-existent entities) the cost of claims. Don’t kill the goose which lays the golden egg. I’m not making this

up.

So, are we clear on government racketeering? If I borrow something from you and hand you collateral to

guarantee you get back what you lent me, then upon return of said loan, you will hand me back the collateral.

Usually with a personal loan it would be something of substance. In the case of the banks, however, your

collateral is your signature and if you fail to ‘repay’ the loan of credit they will come after you, but for what?

can not be ‘paid’ because there exists nothing with which to pay. This is Public Policy, which states that

public debt can no longer be ‘paid’; it can be only discharged, and you’d better not go against Public

Policy..... it has nothing to do with law (which we’ll get to shortly). Your promissory note IS the collateral

and if you ‘repay’ the loan with the proceeds of your labour and then request the return of your collateral,

the promissory note, they might indeed return the original note to you but not before having lent the alleged

asset – the funds. In fact they’ve lent it several times. Your signature/ note is hypothecated an unlimited

number of times (according to the FRB in San Francisco) for at least 90% of the amount which you

authorized by your signature. So, for your $10,000 loan of credit, which cost you at least twice that and

If we get 25 of us together and each kick in enough to pay for the licence to print $$$, about $150,000

USD or 1/4 million CAD, we can start sending out cheques just as finance companies/ credit card banks, etc.

do. Start-up cost is low – just the cost of printing cheques, plus postage, and the return is a windfall –

literally. We can make millions in very short order. Remember the bank which gave me $3,500.00 for

Christmas in exchange for my signature. I presume your ethics, as mine, will not permit you to do this.

The Commerce Game

bankers. Goldsmiths learned that they could issue gold certificates as ‘promise to pay’, rather than moving

gold coins around. The present day bank notes represent the confidence of the people to be able to exchange

them for goods and services. Its all just bookkeeping entries – shifting of credit and debit. We used to have

real money, now only our ‘strawman’ has worthless notes – valuable within the game – think Monopoly™ –

but worthless in the grand scheme of our lives. The gov’t created the strawman in order to engage us in their

game. The strawman’s name is similar to ours, only it is in upper case – it shows up on everything which

you think identifies you, but the identification is government-issued. I went into the post office to cash a

money order and was asked for ID. I handed over my passport. Then I was asked for a ‘second ID’. I told

her, "I can get into any country in the world with this passport and yet the post office calls it ‘insufficient’?

Why 2 pieces of ID?" I was told, "In case it was forged." I responded, "Well, first, if I am smart enough

to forge a passport don’t you think I am smart enough to forge an extra piece of ID – just in case? Second,

the government. So, here is my ‘government-issued’ ID." I gave her my self-created International Driver

Permit. She accepted it. Aren’t they a riot? Any information the feds got in order to issue ‘gov’t-issued ID’

came from me. This makes me the authority. Why would anyone trust a third party, but not me, when I’m the

original authority? She even admitted, "The policy wasn’t designed to make sense."

All contracts we signed have the strawman name, not ours, on them. Have you ever noticed that your

driver’s licence, bank statement, and any bill that you receive is in all capital letters? Even the now-’corrected’

Cdn. Driver’s Licences lists ‘last name’ first which still makes it a corporate name because sovereigns don’t

Living souls do not have ‘names’; we have descriptions, e.g.: Smith, from Blacksmith, the description of

one’s trade. This is why the native peoples’ ‘names’ are the way they are. Only corporations have names;

hence, when a cop or judge asks you your name, it would be foolish to answer him for several reasons:

1. You don’t have a ‘name’ so you would by lying;

2. What you believe to be your ‘name’ can’t possibly be ‘truth’; it can be only hearsay because you

don’t have first-hand knowledge that this is you. It is only by hearing this name repeatedly in reference to

you over the years that you believe this name refers to you. You do not know it as ‘fact’.

3. When you state a ‘name’ before the court, you have contracted with the court, thereby granting it

jurisdiction. Remember the ‘name’ is the government-created corporation which they want you to believe is

you. If you state it is you, you have just contracted with thugs. You’ll recall that when the ‘judge’ asked me

my name, I responded, "If I tell you my name will I have entered into a contract with you?" and I was

promptly thrown out of court.

4. Giving hearsay evidence in ‘court’ is fraudulent, not to mention "contempt of court".

anything. It appears as if our strawman does, only it is a fiction and so can’t hold legal title (a

Manufacturer’s Certificate of Origin). The creator of this fictional entity (the government) holds the legal

title. If the strawman incurs a debt, we are held as surety to ‘pay’ it, and yet there is nothing with which to

fictitious strawman can pay fictitious funds (FRN/BCN). So that the strawman can pay a debt, the banksters

set up an account for it. This is your SSN/SIN. Notice your name isn’t on that card. The corporation name

is in upper case letters.

The gov’t now refers to us as ‘human resources’ – the collateral on the national debt. In the US

Government’s demolition of the World Trade Center, the living souls who died were referred to as

"collateral damage". This tells us that we are considered ‘collateral’ by the government. Yet one must be the

holder in due course of the resource in order to use it as collateral and interestingly, the gov’t holds our birth

certificates – our warehouse receipts. It appears that the feds are the holder in due course of our bodies, our

labour, our finances, our property, our lives. They have legal title, we have only equitable title – we are

of our ‘using’ them demands a ‘use tax’. By the way, the demolition of the WTC was to wipe out corporate

debt. How can a phenomenal debt, created by the corporations of this world, be proven if all the evidence of

said debt were lost in those collapsed towers? "Ground Zero" – the balance on the debt.

I read about a man in the UK, John, who defended himself and his wife against two intruders by gaining

control of a knife which one was wielding. One escaped and John stabbed the other who died. John was held

by police, for how long I don’t know, but most people reading this story must have thought he was being

held for murder and are wondering how absurd the laws have gotten when a man is held for murder in the

name of self-defence! But it has nothing to do with murder. All crime is commercial crime. The feds have

convinced us we are corporate entities and John impeded commerce.

The Common Law which applies to all living souls is: We are free to do what we please, as long as we do

not infringe on the life, liberty, property, or rights of another. It does not allow for any government to

prosecute or fine us for victimless crimes. Statute laws have arisen for this purpose, but their power is limited

by common sense and by the resolve of those who would stand up for their natural rights.

One can be fined only if he has signed and breached a contract. Under common law, however, a contract

must be entered into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally or it is unenforceable. Remember that one of

the requirements of a contract is full disclosure. Government departments are aware of this and circumvent it

This one law which takes all real crime into account has now been replaced by over sixty million statutes

based upon commerce. So John is being held because of the only ‘crime’ now in existence – that of

‘impeding commerce’. What commerce?

Let’s take a look at precisely who these intruders were and why they were in John’s house. They were

‘collateral’ belonging to the gov’t. John did not kill another living soul; he destroyed government property –

collateral. Since thieves rarely break into occupied houses, we can safely assume that they were on drugs,

desperate for something to steal and sell for funds for their next fix. Who is the creditor of these funds? The

banksters – specifically, the CIA/ drug cartel. So, John’s taking the intruder out of the commerce game puts a

damper on the expected funds which this man would have paid the banksters during his remaining lifetime,

not to mention having funded the CIA to do even more biz – that of addicting kids to drugs. John thwarted

business – this is why he was held – he was held as surety for his strawman since he was not the holder in

due course of his strawman, so he likely will be charged, but with what? The courts cannot let the cat out of

the bag on this commerce game, so once the attorneys and the courts collect an extortive amount of the

strawman’s funds, via John, from his attempt to defend himself, they will drop charges which were never laid

in the first place. I’m sure John has no idea what is going on and he will never understand until he learns the

commerce game and how he can claim his strawman to perfect a superior claim to his debtor strawman which

will no longer be the debtor of the banksters. In fact, all he had to do was decline to contract with the feds, but

most are so unaware of the power of contract.

In the USA the prison business is huge. Under the guise of punishment for a crime prison owners have

extremely cheap labour at their disposal. At least 86% and possibly 94% of all prisoners are non-violent.

They are there because they contracted with thugs – those who convinced them that doing drugs, most of

which is marijuana and possession, and ‘under the law’ they are to be punished. Now they are working for

pennies an hour.

The drug biz is only the means to the end which is prison. Prisoners’ bonds are sold on the securities

market to A G Edwards and Merrill Lynch. A felon is worth about $4 million, the city of the prison gets $40

million. Investors offer to buy for 40% and increases minimum 200% for bank securities. Over 50% of

money market bonds are purchased in the Orient. The stockholders are the owners of Correction Corp of

America which owns all the private prisons and sell the commercial paper on each prisoner/ slave. Paine

Weber is the prime stockholder. If you hold stock with these international businesses you are betraying your

fellows by keeping them in prison for a commercial crime, yet not the true crime of infringement on the life,

liberty, property, or rights of another living soul. You wonder how the USA can afford a war? The banksters

are selling your fellow living souls as goods which are warehoused in the prisons of the corporate USA/CA.

Sixteen (16) pages of corporations are identified as involved in Prison Profit. Don't bother to ask to look at

their books – this aspect of their biz is not published. Hmmm. All investment firms work for the USA/CA.

If you are involved, you might want to re-assess your intentions from a more ethical perspective. Every

prisoner bond has a Committee on Uniform Securities Identification number so you can track the trade and

how much the principal (the prisoner) is worth, the funds of which he’ll never see.

Same as Nixon’s ‘War on Cancer’ – it worked for the Medical Mafia, in particular the Genocidal

Pharmaceutical Industry, not for those who have developed cancer.

The gov’t acts for our strawman which appears to us that it is we. In order to take back control of our

lives, we must take control of our strawman. Fortunately, we now know how to do this. Since living souls

can not ‘pay’ debt (HJR 192 /Order in Council #16), we can now only ‘discharge’ debt. Since all debt is

strawman you will no longer be held as surety for it and you can discharge its debts with your signature – a

promise to pay, the same way the banksters do it.

– Encyclopædia Britannica, 14th Edition

Mr. Phillip A. Benson, President of the American Bankers’ Association, June 8 1939

Your Papers, Please

It might seem that a pragmatic solution is to get assets out of paper and into substance, yet, we must

correctly-filed Financing Statement (UCC / PPSA) will grant immunity to whatever stunt the PTB attempt to

pull on us. I have heard it said more than once that the Jews never would have been ‘relocated’ had they had

their ‘papers’ in order. I don’t think there is one movie about Nazi Germany where some English-speaking

actor with a bad accent doesn’t demand, "Yah papahs, pleahs?"I don’t think this is any coincidence. Papers

must have meant something. I do not think they are referring to passports. To what they refer are papers

indicating whether one is a creditor or a debtor, whether one is the holder-in-due-course of one’s assets or is

being held as surety for alleged debt, and whether one has legal title or only equitable title to one’s body,

rights, and property. We must get our papers in order. It is not difficult to do. But we have to want to learn

Goering at the Nuremberg Trials

Federal Income Tax

"These people just don't want to pay their fair share."

A woman once told me, "I owe Revenue Canada a fortune. Thank God there are no more debtor’s

prisons." She didn’t understand that debtor’s prison is ALL there is. Since the only crime is "impeding

commerce", this is the only thing that will imprison anyone these days. You might well wonder, ‘What about

murder?’ Remember John. The feds consider everyone a taxpayer and intend to collect a certain amount of

$$ through taxes up until that amount hits a peak and yet before they are required to begin to return $$ in

the form of Social Security/ Canada Pension (SS/ CP), not to mention Medicare, etc. There actually is a

line; take a look at actuaries. If someone kills another before that line is reached, the gov’t regards it as a

financial loss and therefore prosecutes the murderer for ‘impeding commerce’ even though it appears to be

under the guise of ‘taking the life of another’. Its books won’t balance. The gov’t doesn’t acknowledge

living souls; it sees us as surety for a limited liability corporation (LLC) which is a government-created

fictitious entity. But the real living soul, the surety/ accommodation party, will wind up going to jail for

creating a debit on its books.

What was the outcome of all the hurricanes in Florida? No more medicare costs for the feds – the

majority of those who are either dead or ‘missing’ was the elderly; I told you the feds are desperate. Weather

control has been used for over a decade in the USA; see: http://www.weatherwars.info/ Those hurricanes

were most certainly strategically planned. Also, families of those who are allegedly ‘missing’ do not receive

any insurance benefits because ‘missing’ is not one of the terms and conditions of the insurance contract –

only ‘dead’. Florida hurricanes were designed for the same purpose as the gov’t demolitions of the WTC –

to reduce corporate debt.

When Nelson A. Rockefeller was being questioned by Congress prior to his installment to a government

appointment, he was asked, "How much money did you make last year?" Rockefeller answered, "$650

million." "And how much Income Tax did you pay on that?", they asked. "Nothing", was the reply. If you

pay more taxes than Rockefeller does, don’t you think that you need more education?

in the USA reveals the same thing.

Income Tax Act, Canada, R.S.C. 1985, Chapter 1 (5th Supp.), updated to December 31, 2000

An Act respecting Income Taxes

SHORT TITLE

1. This Act may be cited as the income Tax Act. R.S.C. 1952, c. 148, s. 1.

PART I – INCOME TAX – DIVISION A – LIABILITY FOR TAX

Tax payable by persons resident in Canada

2. (1) An income tax shall be paid, as required by this Act, on the taxable income for each taxation year of

every person residing in Canada at any time in the year.

This says it all. You are not a ‘person’. The definition of ‘person’ in Interpretive Laws of Canada and

under the 14th Amendment in the USA is: a corporation. Corporations receive ‘income’ and ‘reside at an

not Canada.

Remember that your strawman is a corporate entity created by the government. If you are the surety then

you are liable for its taxes, however, if you are the secured party, the creditor to its debtor, then you have first

‘income’ tax; besides, no one has even been able to define ‘income’.

Remember the spluttering IRS agent who couldn’t find in the IR Manual where it is written that I am

required to pay a tax on my ‘income’. Go to H&R Block and pull the same stunt – it makes them crazy.

Only if you’re bored that day, though, because you don’t really want to waste much time on their tax fraud

stuff – knowing it is a joke might be enough for you. However, if you’re like me and you like to annoy the

bureaucrats, trust me that it is very good entertainment. Or ring up CRA, ask them, and listen to them squirm.

I now have in my possession ‘Confirmation of Agreement’ evidencing that IRS Commissioner, Mark W.

Everson, Commissioner of CRA, Alan Nymark, and Minister of National Revenue Canada, John McCallum,

all agree that we are not required to pay income tax, or any of the other taxes I listed above – unless we agree

to the terms of their contract. Who would do that?

Syndrome – the behaviour of kidnap victims who, over time, become sympathetic to their captors (named

after a 1973 hostage incident in Stockholm. After six days of captivity in a bank, several kidnap victims

actually resisted rescue attempts and later even refused to testify against their captors). Captives begin to

identify with their captors initially as a defence mechanism out of fear of violence. Small acts of kindness

(read: ‘government benefits’) by the captor are magnified, since finding perspective in a hostage situation is,

by definition, impossible. Rescue attempts (by those of us who intend for the sheeple to WAKE UP!) are

also regarded as threat since it is likely the captive would be injured during such attempts. So, it stands to

psychological reason that mavericks like me are not trusted, in fact, I am feared – even more than the hostage

situation in which most people are unwittingly being held by their governments.

People’s lying to themselves is what saddens me. Those who pay taxes are aggravating the problem; they

believe they have no choice – they have been held hostage. Whether they pay the tax or not is not important

in the grand scheme. What IS important is what is going on in their minds, which happens to be fear. There

is no freedom, no aliveness, where there is fear. People actually lie awake at night in fear of how they are

going to pay their ‘taxes’. It cracks me up, but my heart goes out to them. Their angst is completely

unwarranted.

Your ‘income tax’ does NOT go to operate the Federal Government. You make out the check to the

IRS/Receiver General – CRA (both private corporations). Who endorses it? Look at the back of the cheque.

See who got the $$$? (a private corporation) the FRB, Inc./Bank of Canada, Inc. Then the cheque goes to

The Governor-Secretary of the Treasury of the IMF, Inc. of the United Nations. Those who pay taxes on

‘income’ are giving away hard-earned ‘money’ to the United Nations, a world wide Communist

organization, the intent of which is Collectivism. Five months of your income went to support under

Collectivism (I’d say, ‘Communism’ but this causes people’s minds to close, and the "I don’t believe in

conspiracy theories" kicks in, so I say Collectivism. Tax funds do NOT run the gov’t or any of its alleged

programs; the IMF runs the gov’t; your $$$ is inconsequential to gov’t operation. Taxing is simply the

means to confiscate your personal power. No sovereign can be taxed; only corporate entities can be taxed

and only by the agreement of the principal/ surety – you – if indeed you agreed to it. Why might you

voluntarily, willingly, and knowingly do that? You wouldn’t. You’ve been tricked into it.

Many people highly resent paying taxes. Since they feel thwarted in being able to do anything about it,

they figure out ways to get something back for paying into a system which doesn’t work for them. They

exact their dues by frequenting hospitals, doctors, filing insurance claims, workman’s comp, etc. and feel no

compunction about doing this because they truly believe they’ve ‘paid’ for it. All this does is keep them

locked into the belief that they’re ‘getting’ something. The problem is, because intention is everything, their

behaviour is fueled by resentment. This won’t work for them in the long run. Worse, they become dependent

upon gov’t benefits. We can not afford to be dependent upon any entity which doesn’t have our best

interests at heart. Better, by far, would be to release the fear we have surrounding our beliefs about who we

VAT (Value Added Tax = Sales Tax, etc.)

This is just another means to confiscate your funds and your personal power. GST (goods and services

tax) is another ‘use’ tax which we are not required to pay not only because there is no law compelling us but

also because of who we are which we have been persuaded to forget. I like to carry around "Tax Exempt

Status" card or a "Tax Exemption Certificate" which I show the owner/ manager of places I frequent to

sovereigns are not required to pay tax. We are sovereign until we acquiesce to behaviour which vitiates this

fact. Do you think the queen is tax exempt? Is the Pope Zionist?

So, we are tax exempt and all we have to do is say so, even though we have been taught no longer to

believe in our sovereignty. My prime concern is gas because the total tax is 37%. I know I’m not required to

pay it; I even have the corroboration of CRA, however, I am having trouble with the oil corporations –

surprise surprise. After perusing my gas receipts I sent the CFO (chief financial officer) a true bill for

$146.00 He has yet to fork over so I paid for gas one day with a Transfer Instrument. He called the cops on

me because his fiduciary (yes, a bankster) didn’t recognize it. I straightened it out with the RCMP and told

the CFO that I wanted the name of the officer at his bank because the Receiver General probably wants to

know who is not honouring my transfer instruments, particularly since he and I have an agreement that they

will be honoured. I probably won’t bother to file a PPSA against this twit for a measly $146 in GST and

fuel taxes, the financial liability of which he has unlawfully passed along to you and me. I will, however,

send the banks a 1099/ T4 slip, copy to IRS/ CRA evidencing the income they received for all the service fees

they charge. Its ‘income’ for them.

Law

Ashleigh Brilliant

A cop once stopped me for seatbelt violation. I asked him, "Who is the injured party?" "The State of

were to call The State of New Mexico to the stand, who would show up?" He didn’t know how to answer

me because no one would or could show up. No name in upper case can be an injured party because it is a

fiction, an entity created by the government. Only flesh and blood living souls can be ‘injured’.

So, he asked me for a driver licence which I didn’t have because having one would grant him immediate

jurisdiction over me which, as yet, he didn’t have. I asked if I were required to have one and if so, could he

provide for me the law which compels me. Later, he did actually show me the statute, "all operators must be

enforcement clause. It was simply one of many traffic codes which apply only to those who thought them up.

They have no clout with those of us who don’t agree to them.

Laws can’t compel; they can only protect. If the law doesn’t protect me, the law doesn’t apply to me.

Hence, there is only one law – the golden rule and the breaking of this law results in the infringement upon

the life, liberty, property, or rights of a natural being who has every right to seek just compensation for the

injury. Everything else is statute and applies only to those who are subject to them – namely those who

thought them up. All codes, rules, regulations, statutes, by-laws, and ordinances apply only to those involved

within the departments who documented them. What?! So, the Internal Revenue Code applies only to IR

Agents, CRA codes apply only to CR Agents – and anyone else who might care to contract with those

agencies. Do you? I don’t.

Chuck Conces

Since ‘Equality under Law is Paramount and Mandatory by Law’, and we know everyone in court lies –

its a dog and pony show – why was Martha Stewart sentenced to prison for .... ‘lying’ ? It is because she

agreed not to. Since contract is the only law, she breached the contract wherein she agreed ‘to tell the

truth....’. Had she declined ‘to tell the truth’, she would not be in prison. There is no law against ‘lying’.

law. Bob Dylan said, "to live outside the law you must be honest". It makes me more honourable. The

creator is always above the created. If man made laws then man is above what he made. I never said I was

above the Creator’s laws; I claim to be above man’s laws... mostly because they don’t apply to me. But

that’s not my point here. Think of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein. This is an example of the created being

above the creator. Did it work for Dr. Frankenstein to create something more powerful than himself? Why

then, would we think it would work for us?

Stopping at a Stop sign when we can see well in advance of the intersection that there is no reason to stop

is just being subject to idiocy. Is it our intention, in this example, to serve a Stop sign or was it our intention

police won’t charge me with not stopping at the Stop sign." The role of police is changed.

When I was a child, I was taught, "The policeman is your friend. If you become lost, find a policeman

(who would, in those days, be walking his beat, deterring shop theft by his mere presence, so it would be easy

to find one on almost any street corner) and he’ll bring you home." Mums would be so grateful that he

friend. If you become lost and go to a policeman he might bring you home but he will take me to jail for

child neglect and for allowing my child to get lost." Remember, the presumption is that my children don’t

Actually, my sentiments towards police have been learned as, I started out liking them. When I was 20, I

was hitch-hiking up north in Ontario to visit my boyfriend. A cop stopped me and I thought I was in deep

trouble. As it turned out, he truly did care for my welfare and stopped a car with a bunch of kids and told the

driver to take me to Fern Resort in Orillia. The cop gave me the proverbial police escort to the exit ramp, and

the kids thought it was a hoot and took me directly to my destination.

I am reminded of the story of a fellow in Michigan who has five children, the first four of whom have

birth certificates. The youngest was born at home and hence has no birth certificate (same as mine). One day

the dad was in a store with his kids and was yelling at one of them. A ‘public-minded’ woman overheard this

and, like all good informants, telephoned Child Protective Services to report child abuse. The next day the

cops came by and confiscated all five of his children. The following day the cops came by and returned the

youngest, saying, "This one’s not ours." This is reason enough to make sure your children belong to you

and not the state. For you Canadians who think that your public servants are above this type of seeming theft,

think again. It is not theft. If you have signed over your children to the public via the birth registration I

suggest you get your papers in order to prevent the feds from collecting their collateral – those whom you

call ‘my children’ – for the interest on the loan.

So, what is the job of policemen these days? It is not "to serve and protect", unless this refers to ‘serve

and protect the World Banksters’. Their sole purpose is to collect revenue for the interest on the debt due to

the bankruptcy. They are no longer ‘Peace Officers’. The Motor Vehicle Dept./ Dept. of Transportation

(MVD/DOT) are under the Tax and Revenue Dept. What does this tell you? This is why there are so many

idiotic statutes which are a result of Admiralty Law which simply do not apply to living souls; they apply to

corporate entities. So how is it we get stuck with the fine if the statutes don’t apply to us?

Since laws cannot compel performance, there can be no law telling a property owner that he must build

his house on a particular area of his property. Because, what if he doesn’t? Upon whose rights is he

infringing? Well, possibly his neighbour, in which case the neighbour would be obliged to file a signed,

sworn complaint, ideally also signed by a deposable witness, and have a jury decide if he is indeed an injured

party. Laws cannot do anything but protect the life, liberty, property, and rights of a living soul. Laws are to

serve us; we are not here to serve laws. "if your laws don’t protect me, your laws do not apply to me." So,

The problem is now statutes. Statutes are compelling. They seem to tell us everything we are obliged to

do and everything we can’t do. Statutes have replaced the true ONE LAW. Where before, we could be

found guilty for actively breaking the only law there was we can now be found guilty for doing ‘nothing’ –

meaning neglecting to perform precisely as the statute dictates. Since there are so many, this will occur

automatically just in the affairs of daily life.

That cliché, ‘ignorance of the law is no excuse’ was true when ‘the law’ to which it referred was the

only law we were required to know. But since that one law no longer exists, except in our hearts, that cliché

now applies only to statutes. ‘Ignorance of the statutes is no excuse.’ Ignorance of the statutes is EVERY

excuse because there are 60,000,000 of them, 59,999,973 of which no one has informed you. Trust me, you

are guilty of ‘disobeying’ some, if not many.

What happened? Attorneys make up statutes. So a few questions come to mind.

1. To whom do these statutes apply?

2. Who benefits when one does not adhere to statutes?

3. What is the purpose of having so many statutes, codes, rules, regulations, ordinances, legislation in the

first place?

5. Isn’t law-making the job of gov’t?

6. Why would any representative of the people enact statutes which don’t serve his constituents?

The "Trading with the Enemy Act" of 1917 reclassified us all as ‘belligerents’ under an emergency

situation (actually a declaration of war). So your rights were suspended and a strawman created with an

SSN/SIN. Since the politicians did away with the common law and other law which constituted the

traditionally vested right of the people, what was put in its place? Commercial Law.

This is why people lose trying to argue ‘Constitutional rights’. Courts are military tribunals sitting in

summary court martial proceedings against civilians. Constitutional and common law arguments are not

allowed in such courts. If we were to go back to the common law, as brutal as it might have been, the entire

system of welfare, income taxes, bureaucracy, codes, ordinances, regulations, bylaws, legislation, and rules

would cease to exist.

Attorneys

The Legal Profession has no more to do with ‘law’ than the Medical Profession has to do with ‘health’.

So, when you hear nonsense such as, "practising law / medicine without a licence", notice that the accused is

usually practising ‘health’ or its counterpart in ‘law’ where a licence isn’t required. A licence is acquired

only by those who choose to be under the jurisdiction of the entity issuing said licence. Those of us who

choose to remain free make certain not to obtain any licences at all. A ‘licence to practise law" is procured

Yes, he has a bar card but this has nothing to do with a licence to take a case which must be obtained from the

one who hires him. Consequently this is a great question to ask an attorney whom you don’t want involved

in your commercial affairs. I like to tell them that I don’t give them permission to make a legal determination

about me, because, until I do, they have no venue or jurisdiction. They are a stray looking for a home. They

have nowhere near the power they like you to think they have.

So, you want to be an ‘attorney’; here is your ‘job description’:

- prosecute on behalf of IRS/CRA in order to imprison one for ‘failure to file’;

- be appointed to (foisted upon) us by a ‘judge’ upon our being accused of a crime;

- reject our filing of private documents into the public record

- initiate and file all criminal complaints (we are prohibited)

- confiscate property & funds from marital partners; dictate child custody during divorce proceedings

- regulate private property via land use, planning laws, and codes

- advise employers to confiscate funds via withholding tax from paycheques

- approve the confiscation, by Child Protection Agents, of children from their families

- begin foreclosure proceedings when too many mortgage payments are missed;

- confiscate property when property taxes aren’t paid;

- pilfer our estate via probate after our death;

- turn into a ‘crime’ an activity which has been natural and lawful for centuries, yet, due to current

legislation, now requires a licence;

- initiate actions against us for committing a crime which, until recently, was a lawful activity;

- reap hefty fees for exaggerating personal injury claims causing insurance premiums to sky-rocket;

- claim to be able to handle personal disputes better than those involved;

- complicate simple contracts between 2 parties to where they are completely incomprehensible;

- file unnecessary, embellished paperwork for what would normally be considered simple claims;

- depersonalize and complicate intimate processes such as adoption;

- be the only one allowed into a jail cell even though a friend might better assist us;

- play both sides of the ‘court’;

- through the BAR police your own, be in charge of accreditation of Law Schools, determine the

curriculum in Law Schools by granting or refusing accreditation, make and enforce laws designed to

work only for you, make and enforce statutes which are impossible not to violate because there are over

60 million of them.

- be the power behind all agencies which control the rest of us;

- be a henchman and revenue collector for the IMF/ International Banksters;

- become ‘power of attorney’ when we hire you (grant you a ‘licence to practise law’), thereby

rendering ourselves ‘incompetent’;

Once I told an attorney, with as straight a face as I could muster, that I truly believed that he was an

honest fellow. He responded with, "Well, I try to be." I said, "Well, if you were truly honest, you wouldn’t

need to try to be." (He was as crooked as a dog’s hind leg).

My all-time favourite attorney-routine is the asking of two questions for the price of one. "Did you or

did you not ... ?" An attorney once asked me one of these double-edged questions and so I asked, "What is

it you want to know?" He repeated the question so I answered, "Which question do you want answered?"

He repeated it again, so I said, "no to the first question; yes to the second." Not only didn’t he understand

my answer, but also he didn’t understand his own question. If I had answered just "yes", how could he

know to which part I was referring? "Yes, I did not ..."? or "Yes, I did ... "? As idiotic as it is, attorneys

still use this inane manner of questioning. They must think it sounds daunting, when in fact it only makes

them sound as if they don’t know what they’re talking about, which in most cases is true. But this stunt also

allows them to twist any answer to suit their case. Don’t fall for it. Always answer with either "I did" or "I

did not" ....... in fact, skip the court altogether. There is nothing requiring you to go in the first place. Whom

did the court ‘invite’? You? I don’t think so. All you have to do is RSVP. An invitation to court is

tantamount to an invitation to a Charles Manson party. Don’t go; graciously decline.

Licensure

A licence is "a permit to do some activity which would otherwise be illegal". A licence is the authority to

act on something which in its nature is lawful but prohibited by statutes except with permission of authority.

This activity is now a privilege and can be revoked, leading to no liberty – ‘liberty’ being defined as:

‘freedom and exemption from extraneous control’. Take a look at all the activities for which most people

have been conned to believe we are required to have licences: marriage, building, driver, firearms, business,

professional, trade, BAR ticket, hunting, etc. which tells us that without these permits, the following activities

are illegal: creating a home and family with someone you love, adding a room onto your house, traveling to a

friend’s house in your personally-owned automobile, protecting your family from intruders, ‘earning your

living’ from your privately-owned business, taking care of infirmed fellow living souls, fixing someone’s

plumbing/electricity, going into a court of law (apart from the fact they no longer exist – they are now courts

of commerce) about a matter between you and a colleague, shoot your food in the wilderness, etc., etc. The

list goes on. Why would a free man or woman require permission from the government to get married, drive

a car, start a business, add onto one’s home, or improve one’s property?

We are no longer free to do anything because statutes have been enacted requiring us to get permits in

about control. The Catch 22 of this is that you’re damned if you don’t have a licence because you will get

fined for not having one, and damned if you do because you will get fined for doing something which the

permit does not allow. Either way one is asking for control.

have a ‘driver permit’ which I created for the purpose of facility – something to show the cops to pacify them

as opposed to telling them "I don’t have a driver’s licence", which I did years ago and only created

Those of us with self-issued ‘licences’ not only claim our rights in a responsible and organized way

as a peaceful transitional declaratory offering for gov’t observance but also it introduces the concept of

liberty to others.

The problem is the contract. If we don’t have a contract with the ‘authority’, they have no authority over

us. Alleged ‘authorities’ do everything in their power to intimidate us into getting these permits, such as

telling us it is law, etc. when in fact they cannot make anyone get a licence for anything since this would be

forced contracting, the very nature of which would make it invalid. Not only do we have unlimited right to

So, since I graduated from a school which gave me a diploma stating that I obviously knew enough about

nursing in order to get a job doing this, why do I need a licence to do it? Have you ever noticed that in

obtaining a driver licence, the two things they most want from you is a signature and an address? They

couldn’t give a damn if you know what to do with the car, they want to get your signature on this fraudulent

contract and also know where they can find you if you do something they don’t like and they can come and

get you and/or your car.

Never put on any contract the location of where you sleep at night and never carry any ‘ID’ with an

‘address’ on it. I carry a very out-dated (15 years) passport because its picture of me is great. Actually, it is

great ID because it has no ‘address’. One time a cop asked me for ID. I asked him if I were required to have

ID. Sensing I could be causing trouble, I pulled out some "ID" and said, "Well, I do have ID but the info

That was the end of that.

Never sign any contract unless you are given full disclosure and understand every term of the contract.

Never agree to any terms and conditions which you know won’t work for you. This is the purpose and

meaning of a contract – something to which both parties can agree to be bound without compunction – a

‘signature’, write, "By: (your autograph), agent", as you are agent to the strawman, no doubt to which the

contract applies. Once ‘signed’ it cannot be changed. As ‘acceptor’ or ‘rejector’, you are in control. Make

it work for you.

You can include, "without prejudice" or "All Rights Reserved", or UCC1-207/1-308, which will protect

your right not to be compelled to perform under any contract or commercial agreement that you did not enter

knowingly, willingly, voluntarily, and intentionally, yet I recommend ‘agent’ or ‘authorized representative’

after your signature, which means that you, the living soul, are not the entity to whom the alleged contract

applies. The word ‘By:’ right before your autograph is the best because it evidences your agency.

Licences control, regulate, stifle, intimidate, rob, and destroy. Licensure is presented under the guise of

protectionism. Governments license in order to make work for secretaries, boards, bureaucrats, and

commissions whose function it is to assure government an additional source of revenue from the price of

granting its permission. Tyrannical governments prefer that their subjects/ slaves be required to ask for their

permission prior to, and as a condition of, doing nearly every kind of independent, public, or private activity.

Such governments want servile subjects who do what they are told to do. So, entire administrations are

created to promote the acceptance of licensing as ‘for the common good’ or ‘for public protection’.

Gov’t licensing is all about the difference between a ‘right’ and a ‘privilege’. A ‘free’ individual has the

right to do anything as long as in doing so no threat or harm is done to the life, liberty, property, or rights of

another. However, one must request permission to do something which transgresses the rights or property of

another, in which case only the one owning the right or property has the authority to grant the permission. As

the government has no rights to give – it has only duties and limitations – and it has no authority to collect

any revenues other than duties, impost, and excise taxes, Gov't has no authority to profit financially from

licensing.

"Everyone knows"

The only way that ‘everyone’ could ‘know’ anything is if someone had a vested interest in making sure

that ‘everyone’ ‘knows’ something. In every case of ‘everyone knows’ is one who stands to benefit by what

‘everyone knows’; hence it can not possibly be a truth since all ‘truths’ seem to be known by very few

because all truth can be known only intuitively and/or experientially. I don’t know of anything that ‘everyone

knows’ which is true, do you? The only reason that ‘everyone knows’ anything is because they’ve been

propagandized into allegedly ‘knowing’ – the public fool system being the best perpetrator of this fraud.

How is it that an entire continent can know when to set clocks ahead and back, yet very few know that when

newspaper? So, if everyone knows something – anything, you can count on there being one with something

to gain from our ‘knowing’ it. You can also count on its being untrue. Therefore, ‘everyone knows you have

to pay income tax, get a driver’s licence, get a good education’, etc. – none of which is true.

"Everyone Knows" You Have to Go to Court When You are Summonsed

claim against a living soul. So, when you are served a summons, check to see if your name is on it. It can’t

be. The exception is, of course, if the Plaintiff is another living soul and is bringing you into court because

you truly have injured him by breaking the one law, which he will have to prove.

Since the courts get more mileage/ kilometrage from our thinking that the Constitution/ Charter of Rights

and Freedoms is the law which the courts are bound to use and wasting our time citing it, they really don't

want us to know that it doesn't apply. Actually, this is good news, better news, and best news since relying

upon these documents for legal argument just makes judges rule against us. These documents apply to

sovereign entities, however, if you find yourself in court it is because you have relinquished your sovereignty

law of the land is contract law and falls under the UCC.

The significance of Erie vs. Thompkins case decision of 1938 is that no cases prior to 1938 are allowed

to be cited. There can be no mixing of the old law with the new law. All lawyers are members of the BAR

and controlled by the Lawyer's Guild of Great Britain. They created, formed, and implemented the new

the accusation’ because it is ..... the collection of interest on the bankruptcy.

We are denied our right to challenge the creditor/ banker because if we could ‘face our accuser’ we

could ask about our indebtedness and this would blow their cover. They would have to provide us with the

contract proving we knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily, agreed to pay the corporate public debt which, of

course, we did not do. The PTB have apprised the government/ attorneys of the laws/ statutes under which

this system works. We have moved from real law to statutes made up by the attorneys for the sole purpose of

collecting revenue and property.

Read the ‘law’ and you will see that it suggests a circumstance which works for one and all. Read any

statute and you will see that it compels one to a particular performance, which implies yet never states, if not

performed, a fine is imposed. There is no mention of fines in any statute, code, rule, or regulation. Where is

the implementing regulation? They all just state what we are all supposed to do. The reason most have not

squawked too much about these statutes is that they believe they are getting some privilege which

compensates for the occasional fine, and yet just the opposite is true.

A neighbour told me years ago that she was all for everyone getting Social Security Numbers. "If they

can catch just one ‘dead-beat dad’, then it is worth it." This is what she was led to believe. If you ask the

wives of these ‘dead-beat dads’, you’ll discover that the pittance the feds give her, after ordering dad’s boss

to garnish his wages, is taxable and she will be worse off than before, particularly if she has paid an attorney

lose for both parents. If only parents could to sit down and negotiate, they, along with their children, would

all win. Involving the state means you lose all control.

– here is an encouraging story. In her book, Energy Medicine, Donna Eden tells of having taught a class

wherein one of the attendees was a judge. Imagine a judge being so enlightened as to go to a class on

‘energy medicine’!? A few months later he contacted her and related a case he had before him. A man had

beaten his wife and the neighbour who had attempted to intervene. The children were aghast and everyone

was stunned because this man was a true family man and good neighbour; he just went berserk one evening.

The judge asked Donna Eden, "Just before I pass sentence on this fellow I wonder if this might be a case of

that ‘triple-warmer’ thing we learned about in your class" – a meridian line of energy which when blocked

causes chaos. Donna thought so from the description of the man’s behaviour. The judge sentenced the man

this a judge we want our fellows and/or ourselves to face? You bet!

Courts

perverted or parodied.

proceeding impossible.

Common Law Courts (CLC) vs. Judge’s Chambers (JC) (commonly known as municipal, district, state,

provincial, appellate, supreme, federal, courts)

CLC

1. one law – the Golden Rule – you are free to do anything you please as long as you do not infringe upon

the life, liberty, property, or rights of a living soul.

2. is the truth

JC

1. Equity Law – compels performance via contract. This can be only civil, not criminal, yet failure to perform

as directed by a court can bring charges of contempt which is a criminal action. Admiralty/ Maritime Law –

civil jurisdiction of compelled performance which has criminal penalties for breach of contract. Since

International contract backs codes, etc. and ‘courts’ won’t admit to this jurisdiction, they call it Statutory

Jurisdiction. There are 60 million statutes, codes, rules, regulations, ordinances. Since 1938, all decisions will

be based upon commercial law with criminal penalties. (This is why you can go to jail for not wearing a

seatbelt.)

2. is colourable – truth can not be seen or heard *

CLC – to compensate injured party

JC – to obtain a contract in order to collect revenue for the Crown, to pay the interest on the Bankruptcy.

CLC – Accuser and Accused

JC – only ‘debtors’ and ‘creditors’; ‘fictions’ and ‘sovereigns’ – Plaintiffs and Defendants

CLC – belongs to jury

JC – Judge has none and so tricks us into granting it

CLC – Judge is mediator

JC – Judge approves motions and signs summary judgements – against living souls

CLC – accused is summonsed to court via a signed, sworn, witnessed complaint by an injured party

JC – living soul is tricked into chambers as ‘defendant’ via a summons, thereby granting jurisdiction.

The summons needs only to be signed by the ‘judge’ thereby making it a summary judgement.

CLC – accused can plead "innocent"

JC – no ‘innocent’ plea, only ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’ or ‘no contest’

CLC – straight-forward and works for all involved

JC – is backwards or mirror-image; works only for the ‘court’

CLC – accuser whom accused can face

JC – corporation represented by a prosecuting attorney who confronts defendant

CLC – accuser must prove accused’s guilt

JC – defendant must prove innocence – yet, it is impossible to prove a negative

CLC – presents himself or has a lawyer represent him; (‘defend’: ward off attack from; OED; the word itself

accurately suggests we are going to court as one to be attacked)

JC – Strawman, represented by an attorney

CLC – will present the truth of the matter – the facts

JC – will put us into ‘dishonour’, make us the ‘debtor’, – no debtor can win; no creditor can lose

JC – attorneys have the defendant plea bargain since, if defendant is indeed innocent the attorney makes

CLC – infringement upon life, liberty, property, or rights of a living soul (a civil suit)

JC – all crime is commercial – a breach of contract

JC

1. tricks living soul to believe he is the ‘Defendant’,

2. is sworn to collect revenue for the Crown,

4. makes sure his client loses so he can get a cut of the fine (not so in civil suits)

5. works solely for the court unless he contracts to work for the living soul in which case he becomes a

‘lawyer’

CLC – ‘trial by jury’; the jury judges both the facts of the case AND the law itself

JC – ‘jury trial’ which means that the jury does what the ‘judge’ directs – this might include ignoring either

the facts of the case and/or the law in question

CLC – accused is permitted to face his accuser (the injured party)

soul

CLC – judge asks this in order to know if accused is clear about the complaint

JC – judge asks this in order to get defendant to contract

CLC – jury gives verdict; judge sentences with jury’s

approval; a living soul pays a fine or serves time

JC – Strawman/Defendant, not living soul, is sentenced. Unfortunately, the living soul thinks he is the

Defendant. Everyone who is in jail is there because of something he said, or failed to say, prior to, or during,

an administrative tribunal, not for some ‘wrong’ deed.

* In an equity court – which is all there is since there are no more courts ‘of law’ – when we are asked,

"Do you swear to tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth so help you God?", we must

neither see nor hear ‘truth’. They are courts of fiction and cannot have any truth within. If indeed one tells

the ‘whole truth’ the cat will be let out of the bag and he will thereby be in contempt and go directly to jail.

We must tell ‘our’ truth, which is that we accepted and returned their offer, (more later), yet telling ‘the’ truth

will land us in jail very quickly. Remember that Martha Stewart got herself into trouble not by having

anything to do with ‘insider trading’ but by lying. Since there is no law against ‘lying’, the only way she

‘swear to tell the truth’ – it was her ‘swearing in’ that created the contract which she later breached by lying

– which convicted her. Had she never agreed /contracted to ‘tell the truth’, she never would have been

convicted. Her conviction had nothing to do with ‘insider trading’ OR ‘lying’; it had everything to do with

contracting.

A game warden caught a man with furs in the trunk of his car. Every time the warden, and ultimately the

judge, asked about the furs, the man responded with, "What furs?" Even when the furs were pointed out to

him he asked, "What furs?" The had to let him go because he never contracted.

Contracts

I am not making this up; the courts literally trick us into contracting with them in order for us to slit our

‘swear’. We have an option; we are not required to tell the truth unless we swear we will – i.e.: enter into a

contract with someone and agree to tell the truth. The sole purpose of that question is to get us to contract.

They have NO jurisdiction until we contract. As long as we do not contract with them – and no law can

contract. All they do is go along with us. They have no commercial energy of their own – they rely on us to

give it to them. All law is commerce; all commerce is contract; no contract – no case.

The following "Toothpick Story" illustrates this concept. A fellow went to court and had managed not to

contract right to the end when he said, "It seems my public business is finished here so I am now leaving",

and headed to the door. The judge yelled, "And take that toothpick out of your mouth!" and the man did.

As soon as he did, the judge yelled to the Bailiff, "Arrest that man." Why? Because by removing the

toothpick from his mouth the man had contracted with the court.

All Law is Contract; Every Interchange Between People is Contract;

All Commerce is Contract;

Contract Makes the Law

At common law, these eight elements are essential to the creation of a contract: offer, acceptance,

intention, sufficient and equal consideration, mental and lawful capacity to contract, legality of purpose,

genuine consent (knowingly, willingly, and voluntarily), certainty of terms and conditions.

You are usually tricked into contracting. I heard of a woman who was charged with writing ‘bad

cheques’ and prior to sentencing was asked by the judge if she had anything to say. This is called,

‘allocution’ and is the time for the ‘defendant’ to say what’s so. Unfortunately, most defendants fail to take

advantage of this opportunity to set the record straight. She, however, told the judge, "With all due respect, I

do not accept your sentence." The judge then said, "I sentence you to 25 years." Again she said, "I do not

accept your sentence." He called both attorneys, who were now visibly irate, to come forward. The judge

then asked, "Well, Ms. ... , would you think it kind of the court to sentence you to only 10 years?" Again

she said she would not accept his sentence. The judge's final words, to the dismay of the attorneys, were, "I

hereby dismiss this case and all charges are dropped." He couldn’t do anything without her agreement. This

is the power of contracts.

By the way, it is impossible to write a ‘bad cheque’; there is no such thing. If it has a date, a payee, a

$$$ amount, and an autograph it is a lawful commercial instrument because the funds are created by those

four requirements. If it is kept by the corporate entity to which one has specified ‘credit/pay to the order of’,

then it is clearly being used as such. Don’t let anyone tell you that you wrote a ‘bad cheque’. Sure, there

might not have been debt funds in the account to cover it yet that doesn’t mean that the private side hasn’t

been accessed. In fact, you can be certain that it has been if it weren’t returned to you and if it has been

returned then keep in mind that a debt/ legal tender (payment) offered in honour (in good faith) and refused,

is a debt discharged. There is no commercial crime here except on the part of the entity trying to charge you

with ‘writing a bad cheque.’ Remember: A Promissory Note is a Promissory Note is a Promissory Note.......

more later when I recount my latest adventures with RBC (Royal Bank of Canada) and CRA (which

continues to change its name – so just remember it as the Canadian version of IRS).

An offer of contract becomes binding after 72 hours (3 days); after seven (7) days there is a default and

after ten (10) days there is a summary judgement. So handle your offers immediately.

The basis of 99% of all legal actions is derived from a ‘person’ (strawman) being sued, or accused of

a commercial contract. If the contract does not meet the four legal requirements, it is void. In order to live free

The most significant presumptions are:

1. that you are a resident;

2. that you depend upon the government for benefits;

3. that you are not responsible for your behaviour; and

4. that you need protection – an attorney, a financial advisor, a doctor, a fiat currency, etc.

(Protect me from the protectors.)

people are collateral for a debt which supports a fraudulent monetary system. All are based upon the

presumption that certificates of ‘birth’/ ‘title’, etc., in commercial law, waive our right to take responsibility

for our own affairs and own our bodies, plus life, liberty, and the property we accumulate through trading our

labour with others or creating from raw materials, if we don’t object to or arrange our affairs otherwise.

The PTB have established a long history (hundreds of years) of lending what is considered ‘money’ or

‘credit’ and then calling in debts, and creating wars around the world over these debts.

Believe it or Not!

1. IRS/CRA is not a Government Agency; it is a collection agency. All Alphabet Agencies (CIA, DOT, etc.)

are agencies of the IMF (International Monetary Fund) which is an agency of the UN.

2. SSNs/SINs are issued by the UN via the IMF, not by Social Security Administration or CRA

3. There are no Judicial courts and hence no ‘judges’ overseeing ‘law’. There are Executive

Administrators enforcing Statutes and Codes.

yours. You are listed as a Tenant.

5. The Revolutionary War was a fiction/fraud/ruse. The King of England financially backed both sides

of the American Revolutionary war.

6. America is a British Colony. Britain is owned by the Vatican.

7. The Pope can abolish any law in USA/CA. Pope’s laws are obligatory. The Pope has ordered the

genocide and enslavement of millions of people.

8. We are slaves and own absolutely nothing – not even what we think are our children.

9. The duty of the police is not to protect you; it is to protect the Corporation and arrest code-breakers.

10. Everything in CA/USA is For Sale: roads, bridges (yes, the Brooklyn Bridge is for sale), schools,

hospitals, water, prisons, airports, etc.

11. Social Security/Insurance is not insurance; nor is there a Trust Fund holding it. The SS/SI cheque

comes directly from the IMF which is an Agency of the UN

12. A 1040/ T1 (filing) form is for tribute paid to Britain – the interest on the bankruptcy.

13. We are enemies of the State pursuant to Trading with the Enemy Act, 1933

14. The Constitution cannot be used to ‘defend’ oneself as none of us is a party to it.

15. Can/Am is a British colony. CA/USA are private corporations, not territories.

16. The UN has financed the operations of CA/USA gov’t for over 50 years; it owns every man, woman,

and child and also holds all the land in Can/Am in Fee Simple.

18. All wars are a scam/farce/fiction. USA/CA and other corporations were making loans to others all

over the world during the Depression. USA financed the building of Germany’s infrastructure in the 1930s.

All those who died defending their non-existent ‘countries’ died in vain. Switzerland is ‘neutral’ as this is

where the Bank of International Settlements is located. Wars are simply a red herring to keep us believing

that government is necessary.

Crime

Impeding Commerce, via Breach of Contract, is the only crime.

USA: 27 CFR 72.11- code of federal regulations defines Commercial Crimes as any of the following

types of crimes (Federal or State): "Offenses against the revenue laws; burglary; forgery; counterfeiting;

kidnapping; larceny; robbery; illegal sale or possession of deadly weapons; prostitution (including soliciting,

procuring, pandering, white slaving, keeping house of ill fame, and like offenses); extortion; swindling and

confidence games; and attempting to commit, conspiring to commit, or compounding any of the foregoing

crimes. Addiction to narcotic drugs and use of marijuana will be treated as if such were commercial crime."

ALL CRIME IS COMMERCIAL!!!

Peter McWilliams wrote, Ain’t No Crime If You Do about victimless crimes. "If there is no injured

party, no deposable witness, no filed sworn complaint, how is it that the government gets away with charging

you with a crime?"

Extortion

How to handle a bully:

1. pay him;

2. obtain third party intervention;

3. learn his rules and beat him at his own game;

4. remove yourself

None of these heals the cause, yet sometimes the cause can’t be healed and treating the symptoms will

only encourage the bully. What we need to do is remove ourselves from the bully.

Corporations and Corporate Entities

Corporations are for unlawful purposes, primarily to escape punishment for their crimes by placing the

blame on a fictional organization responsible to no one. Their sole purpose is to shirk responsibility. One

who incorporates or even those who join a corporation are doing it for the purpose of avoiding personal

responsibility for their own lives. I realize this sounds harsh, yet take a look at the results for the evidence.

When corporations are established with the power to declare themselves ‘bankrupt’ that makes them

criminal. This is the situation of governments today. Corporations are legal fictions; that is, they do not exist

except in the minds of men. A corporation, being a legal fiction, cannot think, it cannot act in any manner, it

cannot even communicate with a natural man, and for this reason it must have somebody to speak and act for

it, and the lawyers have set themselves up for this task. The enormity of corporate enterprises is limited only

by imagination and they are gold mines for the bar associations, which are corporations themselves. Only 6%

of all corporations pay any tax whatsoever and the rest they get by taking our exemptions – think Enron – or

any tax whatsoever.

Powaquatsi (Powaq quatsi): life in transformation; a way of life or an entity which consumes the life

forces of other entities in order to further its own life; e.g.: a corporation

Yet, the most common and insidious corporation by far is the one for which you are personally being

held as surety. You have been tricked into this by the gov’t which created this corporation. Since all

corporations are gov’t-created, we can surmise that the sole purpose of all corporations is to generate revenue

for the World Bank. The corporation for which you are being held as surety is the one whose name

resembles yours.

If you’ve ever worked for a major corporation, you’ve heard the constant lament about trying to save

money for the corporation. Well, there is no money, and there is no corporation. So whatever they’re doing,

they’re doing for entities which don’t exist, and at the expense of living souls. The real problem is that real

living souls truly think that the corporation needs to save money and of course this is based upon the fear

that if it meets its demise, through loss of some kind or another, then so will they. What corporate people

need to do is walk away and privately contract out their talents. The wins to this are: no taxes withheld,

SS/CP becomes optional, reduced tax (if you choose to file and use business deductions), control over time,

etc. The benefits are endless. When the gov’t sends you a bill for taxes due and owing, you can’t ‘pay’ it yet

consultant; his income doubled and his taxes were reduced to a third.

I always worked for agencies rather than hospitals because I was paid about 25% more by remaining

somewhat independent. I’d ask the nurses on the ward why they didn’t do the same. "I want the benefits." I

told them that with what I earned I could easily afford to handle any ‘emergency’ which might come up, and

which probably wouldn’t, yet they are working 40 hours a week for peanuts in anticipation of their need for

surgery. These were young women. Talk about "getting yourself with a good company." They were

enslaved. The longer they were there, the longer they would have to stay – in order to collect whatever they

thought they might get when it was all over. I know people who can consciously say, "I can’t leave; I’ll lose

all my benefits." YIKES! They don’t see that there is NO benefit in staying. I’ll say it again, there’ll be no

pensions when its time for my generation to collect – 10 years from now. Yet, this is good, better, and best

news. More, later.

A corporation is an artificial, immortal individual. For an organization, e.g.: a church, seeking recognition

of tax exemption under section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code (and who knows what, in CRA), in

order to be an ‘organization’ in the legal sense, it is necessary to incorporate. As soon as it incorporates it

becomes a commercial entity and applies for and obtains an IRS 501(c)(3) status ruling (remaining nonpolitical

and non controversial) and it retains its tax exempt status. Essentially, the state then runs the church.

If you think your pastor/ rabbi/ priest/ minister can speak his mind, think again. Yet, churches are

automatically exempt from Federal Income Tax. Contributions to churches are deductible by donors so why

would a church apply for gov’t stamp of approval when it was already free? A church that is tax exempt is

not a ‘tax exempt church’ but a religious organization which applies for corporate status thereby going from

‘lawful assembly of private citizens’ to that of a ‘legal gathering of public subjects’.

"God never gives us more that we can handle." I want whoever said that to have a chat with those

desperate enough to have committed suicide.

Pritchard, 1973

Model Emergency Health Powers Act

Needless to say, this has nothing to do with health; it has to do with gov’t control. Remember who owns

your body, unless you have taken steps to secure it. Under this act:

1. you will have a mandatory vaccination or you will be charged with a crime

2. you will get a mandatory medical exam or you will be charged with a crime

3. doctors will give the exam or you will be charged with a crime

4. your property can be seized if there is "Reasonable Cause to Believe" that it may pose a public health

hazard... it can be burned or destroyed and you will NOT have recourse or compensation.

This sort of thing is flying around the Internet and although I have no doubt that it is accurate, whoever

wrote it sees this as attack as opposed to desperation on the part of those charged with collecting the interest

on the loan. The only reason things are getting more and more threatening for us and our alleged

‘possessions’ is because the powers-that-be are under the gun to "collect, ... or else." Remember, the gov’t

and all its branches are solely revenue-collecting agencies. If you have private, legal title to your property,

there is no way it can be confiscated; your property includes your body. When they issue warrants for

and to which you have only equitable title. If you already have legal title to your body, you can provide the

papers proving this. I am grateful that I knew, a decade in advance of my birthing my boys, that vaccines are

killers and so neither of my boys is vaccinated – or circumcised – and, of all the diseases deemed "normal

childhood diseases" they caught only chicken pox.

National Debt

The interest on fraudulent bonds also has to be created by more borrowing. The money supply has to be

constantly expanded because the interest has to be paid. Interest on the bonds (national debt) is paid before

any other gov’t expense. If not, the entire system will collapse. The debt can’t be reduced because when

funds are paid to reduce the debt (buy back the bonds and retire them) the money disappears from circulation

since it returns to from whence it came – nowhere. When there is no money, there is depression; the standard

of living drops which is why there is no middle class any longer. This is why the debt must be ‘discharged’

as opposed to being ‘paid’, because it CAN NOT BE PAID.

You might be interested in Jim Trafficant’s speech on The Bankruptcy of the United States. Look it up –

he tells the entire story, which is why he is in jail – but the feds won’t admit to that.

I swore I wouldn’t mention George Bush in this book ..... He claims that his country [corporation] (the

one which has been at war for every year of the past 54) is the most peace-loving country on earth.

Remedy

There must be a remedy. Since we are operating in commerce, the remedy must be found in the Uniform

Commercial Code. Remember:

1. signing the application for a licence is voluntary. You have the right to do these normal activities

2. the applications are for ‘benefits’, ‘privileges’, and ‘opportunities’, which justify denial of your

Creator-given rights with which you were born, but which were transferred upon birth registration;

3. we cannot acquire ‘true’ or ‘allodial title’ to any property purchased with such applications. We

must ‘buy’ property in order to obtain ‘legal title’. This can be done only by exchanging your

Advantages of filing a UCC / PPSA

Filing a PPSA/UCC-1 is rather like the husband putting an ad in the local newspaper (usually the case

and not the other way around) stating he is no longer responsible for his wife’s debts. This reminds me of

the husband who didn’t report his wife’s credit card as stolen because the thief was spending less than she

had been spending. So, the filing is stating something similar.

When completing a UCC/PPSA Financing Statement (FS) keep in mind that the Secured Party (SP)

must be a fiction/Strawman because only fictions can function in commerce. So the SP claims the Strawman

Debtor (SD). Then the SD signs over to the SP, for which you, the living soul, are the agent, everything it

owns via a private contract called a Security Agreement (SA). Do not file the SA, only reference its number

under General Collateral on the FS. The SA gives you, the agent for the SP, a superior claim over the SD

thereby removing you as Surety for the Strawman. The only way you can rebut their presumption that you

you and files the FS. So, it is the SP which files the claim against the SD. Now, any charge against the SD

interests of the Strawman. The problem the registries have in filing these claims is that the SD and SP appear

to be the same entity since both are in upper case. So, be creative: come up with different spellings, or

women can use a maiden name claiming the married name, or list minor children first in order to distract

them from noticing that the SP is also listed amongst the Debtors. If they reject the filing do as I did: I woke

up and remembered who I am. Since they are my servants, I realized that all I had to do is ‘Notice’ them that

the document is registered with Canada Post. I am first in line, first in time. My records show they received it

– rather the same as my car – it is not ‘registered’; it is ‘recorded’. We are to Notice, not request, our public

servants to do our bidding.

unlimited credit with the Fed we can access it through an account. Remember there is no money so it is not

as if you can mosy over to the FRB/ BC and get cash. This is for the discharge of public debt only. We are

intending to remove ourselves from needing cash so you don’t want to add to the problem by accumulating

longer for their benefit. By properly filing a FS we can become the holder in due course of the Strawman.

When we are charged, we can simply discharge the charge with our tax exemption. This is commerce – not

law. None of the charade. We simply accept the charge for value and return it for discharge, settlement, and

closure. Since the claim is pre-paid and our account at the Fed is exempt from levy, the alleged debt goes

away – sort of – at least until we have something with which to pay it.

Since any control, which any alleged authority has over you, comes from your giving it, I suggest you

A ‘judge’ once asked me if I understood the charge (traffic). I told him we couldn’t proceed until he

UCC 1). He just sat there stunned. Silence.

Once we file a Financing Statement we can ‘discharge’ any public claim presented to us. If we ‘honour’

the claim by accepting it, we can discharge it. If we ‘dishonour’ the claim (by resisting, fighting, ignoring,

arguing) we create a controversy which must be taken into court for resolution. ‘Accepting’ doesn’t mean

acquiescing; it means we now control the offer. E.g.: If you have paid the bank $10,000 on a vehicle you

don’t own it. If you show on a Financing Statement that you have invested $10,000 into the vehicle and then

The UCC in article 3, § 505 lists the rights of a party presented with a demand for payment, no matter

creditors. They continue to send me statements; I continue to demand an invoice, signed under their full,

commercial liability and I’ll be happy to settle the accounting, but they never do! To do so would be

committing fraud. How can I pay a bill if they won’t send me one?

The Powers-That-Be – the Global Elite

The top 1% of the world has the same combined income as the bottom 57%, and the disparity is growing.

At the top of the decision-making pyramid we have the Ruling Elite. They utilize psychopolitics

deliberately to influence all nine steps in the decision-making process. They control every step by:

1. Creating events and predetermining their outcome;

2. Manufacturing event details and controlling the information dissemination infrastructure;

3. Biasing the alarm faculties of common people by the selected dissemination of controlled information;

4. Molding knowledge and belief systems through ‘education’;

5. Intentionally providing the children of common people with inferior education through public

instruction while Ruling Elite children attend premier schools and colleges;

6. Controlling the emotions of common people through social rhetoric and religious dogma;

7. Enacting rules and regulations that influence common peoples’ decisions based upon expected

rewards and feared punishments;

8. Intimidating the decisions of ordinary people by enforcing codes, rules, and regulations with coercion,

the threat of force, torture, fines, or imprisonment; and,

9. Erecting surveillance networks which have the ability to monitor the behaviors and actions of groups

and individuals.

Investments

We will see neither our retirement investments nor our pensions. Do not get plugged in; this is good

news. It means the economic structure under which we have been living is about to collapse, and about

bloody time. Yes, there will be some casualties, but for the most part, it will wake us up to know that there is

no security outside ourselves.

A few years ago I took the advice of a friend who was encouraging me to get into the commodities

market and buy ‘March coffee’. At every turn I was stymied. I could not get anything to go the way I

wanted. With each passing week, the window of opportunity narrowed and my final exasperation came when

the fax machine wouldn’t fax the order. I finally said, "Someone doesn’t want me to buy this trade." I

emailed my broker complaining that everything was holding me up: Christmas holidays, bankers, wrong

telephone numbers, faxes, inability to get hold of my friend to ask for the stop date, etc.

He wrote back and said, "Patience, my dear. If you had bought when you intended, you’d be down

$2500". I knew this wasn’t possible since the worst I could have done was a loss of $1400; nevertheless, I

went to the trade website and saw that had I bought March coffee I’d have been out of the market for a nickel

and lost my investment. I laughed so hard I couldn’t stand up. Unfortunately, my friend, who had bought

while I was horsing around not knowing what I was doing, lost a chunk of funds.

returns of substance. The investment game is one which is run by the elite to get our funds. We can’t

possibly win. Its like going to Las Vegas. If you’re going for any reason other than entertainment you’re

putting your faith into something that doesn’t exist. I’m willing to concede that many have made the

proverbial killing in the market, yet they fail to see that what they have gained is a liability. Even more

important is they haven’t yet met the living soul who lost in order for them to win. I finally learned that I

particularly because it is an impossibility.

Sixty per cent (60%) of the stock market is the investments of the CAFR (Comprehensive Annual

Financial Report) accounts of cities. This is where your funds from traffic tickets, property taxes, etc. go – to

fund the gambling of the city officials. They are investing with our funds and winning; then they hide it in a

CAFR account and then cry that they don’t have enough $$$ to pay for emergency services – firemen,

paramedics, etc.

The reason we have the corporate scams (like Enron) these days is because of bad bookkeeping. This is

their only crime. There are no funds to steal; what they have stolen is the exemption of their (former)

employees. Even after you leave the job the corporation continues to use your exemption because they have

your SSN/SIN. The real question is, why haven’t the employees themselves been using their exemptions and

not leave them lying around for the crooked corporations to steal? Bush’s ostensible upset about cracking

down on corporate greed (what a skit!) is not to punish them but to remind them to clean up their act before

the sheeple catch on that they’re cooking the books. Since there is no money it is only credit/ assets which

they’re stealing by juggling the liability side of the accounts which they can do because the people have

turned over their exemptions to them. The cat is out of the bag. These corporations are in for a big surprise.

A woman I know is quite panicky about her future and states, "Well, at least I have my company pension

when I’m 65." I laugh – almost as hard as when I’m told I ought to be saving for my children’s college

education. That’s 3 years from now and the economy will be so vastly changed by then it will be

unrecognizable, not to mention that I don’t want my children programmed any more than they already are via

‘higher education’. So, where does my friend think she’s going to find this corporation which will have

already absconded with her alleged pension? It is a fiction; it doesn’t exist; nor does its alleged assets. Four

(4!) people have said to me, "My pension is ‘locked in’." Chortle.

Civil Liberties

Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991

Bush is in place for only one purpose: to get the American people to give up the last of their few

remaining rights.

Government

Chairman of the House Committee on Banking and Currency

– Thomas Jefferson

Government and hasn’t been in scores of years. To what they refer is USG, the belligerent, foreign

States of America for the sole purpose of conning the American people into believing that it represents them

and that it is its government. The USG, a private, fictitious, for-profit corporation, has no more to do with the

American people or the American territory than does SEARS, another private, fictitious, for-profit

corporation. ‘Americans’, which includes those of us in Canada, have long been subjected to the terrorism of

the corporations USG and Government of Canada. No one alive today has experienced a representative

government – which brings us to another point: why would anyone vote in a foreign election for a foreign

corporation? There is no one for whom to vote who could possibly represent us. Our country has been

under siege for so long I wonder if we will ever get it back.

Gouvernement – Canada

The Constitution and Charter of Rights and Freedoms does not apply to Canadians. Remember the four

elements of a valid legal contract: 1) full disclosure, 2) equal consideration, 3) lawful terms and conditions, 4)

signatures of all parties. Is your signature on it? No, you are not a party to it. Since CANADA is a

corporation, the Charter is precisely that – a charter for a LLC (limited liability corporation) not a contract

involving you because corporations can’t contract; only living souls can contract.

The Constitution is a body of law, written by the state, in order to control the government. The CAG is

controlled by a belligerent, foreign, fictional corporation called the Anglican Church, and known as the

British Crown. ‘Their’ Constitution does not apply to the people of the land mass known as Canada. It

applies, just as every other code, rule, regulation, ordinance, and statute applies, only to the Crown’s

employees – namely the federal and provincial governments and all their employees – and to anyone who

chooses to volunteer. See ‘application of charter’ in Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

32. (1)This Charter applies:

a) to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matters within the authority of Parliament

including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and

b) to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the

legislature of each province.

As none of us signed this contract it doesn’t apply to us. Our ‘charter rights’ are violated with impunity

by the privately-owned Anglican Church legal system franchise known as the BAR Association via the

Vatican and British Crown.

There is a difference between the CAG and the USG: the feds in Canada not only call themselves ‘civil

servants’ but also believe – maybe, they truly are the servants of the people and hence it is easier for them to

understand that the Canadian people truly are sovereign – maybe. Even though Americans are more

inherently sovereign than Canadians, the feds in the US are nowhere near as likely to admit it.

Government – America

There were only 4 purposes of government:

1) to provide a military to protect the American Republics;

2) to monitor commerce/trade among the Republics;

3) to maintain the overall welfare for ALL (not just certain groups or individuals);

4) to govern international commerce of the union.

The Bill of Rights dictates the limitations of government. The people of the united States of America

never had ‘Constitutional Rights’, they had a government with limitations in order to preserve their ‘natural’

rights. Alas, no more.

Socialism: gov’t controls publicly owned utilities (railroads, post, communications, etc.)

Fascism: the people ‘own’ but the gov’t controls everything.

Communism: gov’t owns and controls ALL productivity;

Since the name on the deed for your house is a government-created NAME, the government owns your

house. You’ll notice that this set-up falls into the last definition: Communism

They must distract the people with inane subjects, like sports, politics (thinking there is any difference

among party leaders), via TV, so that they don’t notice what’s really going on.

The first plank of the communist manifesto is: abolition of private property. The agenda of the Global

Elite is to steal land, control families, education, religion, implement a central private bank, promote immoral

behaviour, and eliminate countries and nationalities. DONE!

Court Justice Felix Frankfurter, 1952

Communism

the 10 Planks of the Communist Manifesto

1. Abolition of private property.

2. Heavy progressive income tax.

3. Abolition of all rights to inheritance.

4. Confiscation of property of all emigrants and rebels.

5. A Central bank

6. Government control of Communications and Transportation

7. Government ownership of factories and agriculture.

8. Government control of labour.

9. Corporate farms, regional planning.

10. Free education for all children in government controlled schools

The ‘state’ holds securities on your body, land, business, marriage, children, auto, etc. .. communism,

because state holds the title, state makes the laws, and the communist state keeps track of your benefits and

duties through a system of accounting, not through service and love.

Of the 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto, ALL 10 have been implemented. Women have been

tricked into thinking they have the ‘right’ to work (#8), when in fact it has become a bloody necessity

because of (#2) the heavy progressive income tax.

Thus, the lower class is taking down (strictly feeds off) the middle-class slaves. The upper-class benefits

from its corporate profit from the same slave-force. ‘Corporations’ (creatures of the State) have replaced

‘Companies’ (private with no gov’t control) and ‘Human Resources Departments’ have replaced ‘Personnel

Departments’ in the work place.

The federal government has its hands in nearly 50% of the Gross National Product (GNP). 25 years ago

it was 10%. Under the guise of a Free-Market Capitalist System, Communism has arrived.

When the USG/CAG cries ‘foul’ about anything it chooses, under the guise of ‘national security’, it is

never for the sake of the ‘nation’, or the people of the nation, or the territory of the nation; it is for the sake of

the ‘security of the corporation’ – their own private club. Its members think only of protecting its own

interests, not those of the land mass or its people.

I am reminded of a story of an evil man who was holding captive a little girl. He told her that he had put into

a cloth bag a black stone and a white stone from the path. If she chose a white stone from the bag she could

go free, however, if she chose a black stone she would remain with him. She put her hand into the bag, pulled

out a stone, and promptly dropped in onto the path. It was lost among the other stones. She appeared

regretful and then put her hand into the bag and pulled out a black stone. She said, "Since the black stone

remains in the bag the stone I chose must have been the white." Of course, he had put two black stones into

the bag and yet, due to her cleverness, he was forced to free her. We must develop this cleverness if we are

deal with tyrants.

Freedom

World Revisited, 1958

The problem with knowledge is that there is no going back – like taking the Red Pill in the Matrix. Do I

want to exchange my freedom for an easier life as a good slave? Our freedom will ultimately depend upon

whether we contract away our rights or remain aware of the nature of benefits implying the existence of a

contract, and by our failing to object to the presumption of a contract.

Our ability to ‘choose’ is what constitutes our freedom.

Paul Volcker, former Federal Reserve Chairman

What, Me Work?

Commerce is a game only the banksters can win. They have programmed us to believe that the more

money we have the better life can be – so now men work two jobs and every woman under 50 thinks she

ought to be ‘working’. I never intended to work; I never fell for the ‘women want a career’ nonsense. I’ve

never met a woman who isn’t angry and I contend this is why. Many women went into the work force

believing they could change the world, that the world would be a more pleasant place to be if there were less

testosterone in the powerful positions. Unfortunately, the women who rose to those positions became men.

They donned the three-piece suits and in fact made the problem worse. The only thing worse than men

happier world for their children to grow up, yet the result was they were conned into spending their days

genocidal pharmaceutical industry and medical mafia". I had long felt unethical about poisoning the old

folks so this was perfect. It crossed my mind that I still had two work days scheduled so I intended to keep

my commitment, however, as it turned out, through nothing I did or did not, that day was indeed my last.

I had allowed my RN ‘licence’ to lapse. I refused to submit any longer to extortion – "obtaining money

by compulsion or threat"(Oxford English Dictionary) – or to a licence – "permission to do that which is

otherwise prohibited". (OED) AARN is a corporation which will not permit me to work as an RN unless I

pay it a fee. That’s extortion. RNs are required to pay yearly fees which in 2001 in Alberta cost me

approximately six (6) days of labour – a total of $900 Cdn./$600 USD (a full year’s fee for the 7 months I

worked prior to the next year’s fee, both of which came within the same calendar year, along with union dues

of $400. The union, by the way, refused to assist me in getting wage compensation of $6 per hour for my 25

years experience. I was working for only 75% of my entitled wage). Taking care of the infirm is now illegal

without a permit. What compassionate entity conjured up this plan? This is corporate/ bankster thinking at

its best. I never went back and I never looked back; and they wonder why there is a ‘shortage of nurses’.

Minimum wage is a huge joke and no one could live on it. These jobs are for kids in school who still live

at home and who want some cash for the weekend. It is not designed for those who are intending to ‘earn

their living’, and yet many are grateful that they have these worthless jobs because most of what used to be

‘good jobs’ have been exported out of America (‘outsourced’). Never have more people been out of work –

not even during the Great Depression.

After many years of my being concerned about $$$, I finally had to face the truth which is that I’ve

never had to worry about ‘money’. I’ve always had cash. ALWAYS. I quit trying to figure it out. I don’t

really know how this can be, since, over the same 35 year period that my colleagues have worked and saved

for their retirements, I estimate I’ve actually ‘worked’ only one quarter of that time. I have never worked full

time, except for 2 brief periods in my twenties, both of which were less than a year. There have been entire

financially supported by their father. I wonder how I’ve managed to survive.

I’m not suggesting I did it all on my own; I am suggesting that I’ve never had to worry about $$$ and it

is not due to my having worked hard all my life. While it is true that no woman works harder for her money

than when she marries it, this was very short-lived. I attribute much of it to learning the credit card scam,

probably worth $90,000 to me. Cash has just always had a major presence in my life – not so much that I

can take year-long trips around the world or live in the lap of luxury, and, I’ve never owned my own house,

am better off – at least I know it and I am not deluding myself. No one can take anything from me – I have

nothing to take and that which I do have I know how to protect.

You’ve heard stories of wives who go off to work and, after commute/ clothing/ childcare expenses along

with what the gov’t confiscates in income tax, the family is actually farther behind in net income. What were

job in life is huge enough; – that of dragging their men from the ‘world’ into the spiritual realm. I haven’t

even touched upon the time and energy consumption of minding children and creating a home.

My divorced friend had to pay tax on her husband’s child support payments, which he got to ‘write off’

as an expense, but she, who desperately needed the extra funds, got to hand over the bulk of it in tax.

Something’s wrong, yet this is no surprise to anyone. So why are women working? I am reminded of the

woman who left a note on the refrigerator for her husband. "Supper’s in the oven; I’ve gone to law school –

I’ll be back in 4 years."

When the simple truth about banking is revealed, we’ll see that the economic effect of their stealing and

wives will have the option to stop working while keeping the same standard of living or working and

doubling the family’s wealth. If enough of us learn about the fraudulent banking system our loans could be

forgiven or discharged, the government’s budget balanced, and the personal IRS/CRA tax cut to zero with no

Unlimited Credit

The amount of credit the feds earned from investing in securities the credit borrowed from us via the

federal mafia is the debtor. They owe us interest for using our credit, yet, since they (the Public) are bankrupt,

there is no ‘substance money’ so we, as creditors, will have to get paid by taking equity, in the form of our

houses and cars, as the ‘set-off’ – the balancing of the account. They owe us interest on our credit which

they are using to pay for the manufacturing of all the goods and services we are buying. We have already

never disclosed to us. The feds are hoping we won’t request the profits of our investments, however, if and

when we do, it is substantial enough that we would never have to work again. We could never spend it all.

WE DO NOT NEED, NOR WERE WE EVER MEANT, TO ‘WORK FOR A LIVING’

The government floated a bond against our future earnings by using our birth registrations as the

collateral for our ‘promise to pay’. Income tax is just their having ‘educated’ you to pay the interest on the

loan YOU lent THEM. When we access our Direct Treasury Accounts, those held at the BC/ FRB under our

SINs/ SSNs, we will no longer ‘have to’ work. Meanwhile, we will continue to:

1. slave-labour for entities which do not exist except for the purpose of profit,

2. do something other than what we were designed to do, and

Our life’s labour and everything we’ve created, have become the legal, commercial collateral of the

bankrupt USA/CA Inc.

The feds give us back from our labour just enough to keep us convinced that we are actually earning

than for each other and for our own enjoyment but also we already have enough credit to buy anything we

want or need; we have just been, so far, prevented from accessing it. Since that is what ALL currency is

today – our credit – it ought to be easy to realize that we can use our OWN credit – credit from our

exemption, not credit which only creates more debt.

Think what would happen to the banksters if we all suddenly had everything we wanted. They would lose

their control over us. We wouldn’t need to work, nor worry about ‘paying the bills’, nor believe that there

was any authority outside ourselves. (We are an extension of, not separate from, our Creator.) It is our

concern and worries over ‘money’ which allow them control over us. How could the powers-that-be – those

who are running the world in what seems to be about as disastrous a manner as can be – continue to do what

that is way more fun. It is said that if we all ‘worked’ at doing what we wanted, all necessary jobs would get

done. The remainder, the manufacture of WMD, for example, would either cease to get done or the powersthat-

be would have to do it themselves. What a concept! What an interesting place to live this world might

become!

If you want to make someone angry, tell him a lie; if you want to make him furious, tell him the truth. So,

at the risk of infuriating you, isn’t it strange to think that all these years you have been working for what you

wanted and unbeknownst to you, everything you ever purchased from every corporation was already paid for.

All you had to do was go and claim it, sign for it, and take it home; and this includes your home – it too was

prepaid. You never had to work a day in your life to ‘pay for’ anything. All these years you could have been

playing and doing what you love to do. We were conned into getting a good education so we could get a

good job; all based upon the presumption that this is what we wanted. Would you work as hard as you do if

you knew that nothing, which you think you own, belongs to you?

Grachanin

***

PART III

KNOW THYSELF

REMEMBER WHO YOU ARE

The ‘System’

Most people in the world are wholly dependent upon ‘The System’ and cannot function without it. This

system forces them to live in a debt cycle which never ends. The system perpetrates an addiction to

materialism for the purpose of producing interest which is created from debt. Since debt does not really exist,

then neither does interest. Hence, the national debt is a hoax perpetrated by the PTB.

The biggest con game the world has ever known was perpetrated by those who control education, law,

we are unworthy, not to trust our intuition, that we must depend upon the authorities, that any punishment we

sustain is justified and deserved, that we have no self-generated power, that what is outside our minds is real.

They have confiscated our health, wealth, love, and peace of mind under this ruse. This scam is known as

The Matrix.

How did we ever get conned into believing that we are required to ‘earn’ our living? The perpetuation of

this myth is destroying our true spiritual nature. If my Creator and I co-created my physical existence, then

this makes me sovereign, right? Why would I do anything other than just be free to live, to experience?

Someone thinks we must pay for the privilege ... who? How did this ever come about? How could we ever

have fallen for this nonsense? Someone on this planet had the most brilliant, scathing idea in the history of

mankind – to appeal to our egotistical belief that we are all guilty and deserve punishment, that we are

something other than who we truly are ... and capitalized upon it.

When I began to study law, with the intent of understanding why the world is as stupid as it is, I got only

further entrenched. The expanding gap between my demand for peace of mind and that for resisting authority

made me crazier than I already was. I knew that what I resist persists and yet I kept trying to make work,

congressional complex", after Eisenhower’s suggestion. I was trying to make sense of something

completely nonsensical.

the ego mind. Our spirit mind is continuously intending to show us that getting upset by trying to change

something that isn’t real is the epitome of ‘effort in futility’. It took me years to stop trying to change what

isn’t and focus on changing the perceiver – me. The world was the way it was only because I said so. Finally,

Most of the so-called ‘Patriots’ I knew were busy studying laws, the Internal Revenue Code, statutes,

Code of Federal Regulations, US Code sections, US Supreme Court cases and decisions, judges’ rulings,

etc. For some reason I just wasn’t interested. They could quote all this stuff yet, intuitively, I felt ... so what?

The only one which I found to be significant and worth remembering was Miranda vs. Arizona, wherein we

are told, "... Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law." (read: EVERY thing you

say WILL be used AGAINST you.) No ‘maybe’ here. This particular supreme court ruling stuck with me

as being one of the most important things I could ever learn, and ... I was accurate. This is the entire purpose

A Course In Miracles

After thirty-three years of knowing something was seriously wrong, yet not knowing how things could

possibly be the way they seem to be, my demand for peace of mind led me to a set of three texts called, A

Course In Miracles.

The Course teaches that all which we experience is only a projection of our minds based upon our belief

happening except in our minds. Every event is just another opportunity to forgive ourselves for thinking that

we abandoned God, which is a laughable concept.

I think that everything about ACIM requires faith only until the evidence becomes obvious through

experience. The Course incorporates both the Big Bang and God's ‘creation’ of the universe. Actually, what

time, all dimensions, etc. were ‘created’ as a hologram in an instant, yet it was not a true creation because all

of this exists only in our minds – as a thought. The Course tells us that ‘thoughts leave not their source’,

hence, what we call ‘creation’ is in fact a ‘miscreation’. That which evidences that it does not extend outside

up down, light dark, male female, bad good, etc. If love is all there is – God being only a light/love energy

(and not an entity with human characteristics which the ego mind continues to threaten) – then what is allencompassing

what we perceive, thanks to the ego), then it can’t possibly exist except in our minds. We made up the entire

thing as a dream and our Creator is just waiting for us to wake up and ‘return home’ even though we never

left, except in our thoughts, for how could we leave something that is omnipresent? Our only sin is that we

Think of our Creator/God as a loving parent watching her child experience a bad dream (life as we know

it is often referred to as a ‘nightmare’). The parent has no idea what her child is dreaming; she knows only

that it is terribly upsetting to the child. The parent can’t intervene into the dream and change it to be more

pleasant because the dream exists only in the child’s mind. There is nothing to be done other than to get the

child to awaken and realize that he made up the entire dream. Only when the child awakens, will he see how

he caused himself such unnecessary grief. But while he is in the dream it seems completely real. The

following night, does the child go back into the dream with the intent to change the previous night’s bad

dream, or does he just move on with the next night’s dream’s adventures? The intent of the child is not only

to move on but also to experience his dreams as pleasant. Wouldn’t it be particularly convenient if he

remained conscious within the dream so that if a bad dream showed up, he could know that none of it was

real – that it was just a dream from which he would awaken and have no fear?

Thomas Szasz, in his book Myth of Mental Illness, acknowledges the dualities of life and those things

which we believe to be scourges of society are really just creations in order for us to be able to see ourselves

as opposites, e.g.: to assuage guilt, attorneys need criminals; to feel healthy, medics need sick patients; to feel

erudite, professors need students; to feel righteous, church-goers need sinners; to feel privileged, the rich

need the poor; to feel generous, philanthropists need welfare recipients, to feel powerful, the ‘authorities’

need the obedient, etc. We each created the opposite of ‘who we think we are’ in order to believe in our own

existence. We’re all just continuously attempting to define and defend our existence. The reverse is also true

in that our spirit selves – who we really are – do not require the projection of the opposite of us because there

Those in Medicine don’t know ‘health’

Those in Schooling don’t know ‘education’

Those in Religion don’t know ‘spirituality’

Those in Finance don’t know ‘commerce’

Those in Legal don’t know ‘law’

Those of us outside these disciplines tend to be aware of the mind-manipulation within them. Those

within these disciplines cannot escape due to fear for their identity – who they ‘think’ they are. If they ever

woke up, who might they BE?

Hence, we often reveal what we most loathe about ourselves via our jobs. They represent how we want

others to perceive us. I ask every nurse, "Why did you become a nurse?" "I wanted to help people."

Anyone who has ever done any inner work knows that we can’t ‘help’ anyone. We can only assist others in

their healing. We all must do our own work. Nurses tend to believe that taking care of others is more

honourable than taking care of themselves and their self-loathing is revealed by their rampant addiction to

substance as well as behaviour. Most nurses are one of or any combination of: overweight, smokers,

drinkers, or druggies. Those who aren’t don’t claim to identify themselves as BEing a nurse. They are likely

to know, "I am not my job." Those who try to hide-out with their professions are doing themselves a

disservice, not to mention those with whom they come into contact. Cops, collection agents, and all others

who intend to intimidate people want the world to perceive them as ‘powerful’ – but only because they

believe they are not. Since at some visceral level we all know this the cops become bullies because their jobs

those behind the titles are powerless, by their own estimation, or they wouldn’t have chosen that particular

vocation. As Ram Dass said, "Cops are just God in drag."

Lose the Fear, Mare

Because we attract only people, places, and things which vibrate at the same level at which we vibrate, it is

easy to discover at what level we are vibrating by taking a look at what we have attracted. I never had a clue

how frightened of life I was until I outgrew it enough to see the level of fear in my boys’ father. I must have

been that frightened and obviously operated at that low level in order to have attracted him to me. At the time I

couldn’t see how frightened he was of ‘authority’ because I was seeing him from my perspective which was

equally frightened – no contrast. I can now see that my entire quest in life was to outgrow this fear and the

route I chose was to test my knowledge about who I truly am – my real, sovereign, powerful, spiritual self –

against the alleged ‘authorities’ of this world. Like an ex-smoker’s loathing of the presence of a cigarette

smoker, it is difficult for me to be around frightened people – those who still do as they are told by the

‘authorities’ in their lives – the doctors, attorneys, teachers, bureaucrats, ministers, police, etc.

Guilt

Based upon the belief that we separated from our Creator – the one entity which loves us beyond what we

can comprehend – as long as we have an ego mind – we feel somewhat stupid about having left such a loving

energy. Who would do that? So, not only do we feel guilt over being stupid but also our ego has convinced

us that we have our Creator’s punishment to fear if and when we finally do get back ‘home’. Our spirit

mind does its level best to persuade us that this Creator is loving and isn’t even capable of blame and

punishment, but our ego mind tells us we are bad and deserve punishment and upon our death, we will ‘meet

our maker’, we will be judged, and there will be Hell to pay.

This is just more of the same bad dream. We have projected our ego thinking onto an entity which has no

ego. This is simply a love energy, the highest ever to exist, and our petty little minds think that It cares about

punishing us? For what? Making up nonsense in a bad dream? Does our parent punish us upon our

awakening from a bad dream? No, mum is overjoyed that our peace of mind has been restored and we are no

longer suffering. Does she have us tell her all about our bad dream and what horrible role we played in the

dream, thereby prolonging the agony? No; if she’s smart she will tell us that its all over and nothing to

worry about – it was "just a bad dream".

But, in this life on this planet – which we made up – we feel as if what we are dreaming – that we

on us. Why do most of us fear death? Because we fear the punishment that God is going to bestow upon us

in our bad dream or did she just hug us and say how glad she is that we are out of our nightmare?

We cannot usurp the power of an all-powerful entity, a ubiquitous loving light. What kind of arrogance

has this ego which thinks it can remove itself from something which is everywhere always? Nevertheless,

we are stuck with this absurd guilt from which we run our entire lives. What our egos tell us though is, that

what works better is to inflict this guilt onto someone else so that we don’t look so guilty in the eyes of God,

so that, upon our arrival ‘home’, our fellows will catch more Hell than we will. Well, the glitch to this is that

is not I, is just making my own circumstances worse. There is no one out there to accept my guilt and the

only thing I have accomplished is to go further unconscious. Now I am in a situation which will ultimately

cause me more grief because I feel more guilt for having attacked another aspect of myself. There is no one

out there. It is ALL my bad dream.

A Course In Miracles

No meaning that comes from outside ourselves is real. Nothing real can be threatened; nothing unreal

exists. Herein lies the peace of God.

The crux of the Course is the relinquishment of fear and the acceptance of love. As this process of mental

realignment works within the individual, it spreads through him to revitalize the lives of those around him.

The means of this transformation is the practice of forgiveness. The goal of the Course is the attainment of

inner peace.

We were given the Course for several reasons which include:

1) the necessity of healing the mind of its belief in ‘attack is salvation’; this is accomplished through

forgiveness and the undoing of our belief in the reality of separation and guilt.

2) correcting the errors of Christianity, particularly where it has emphasized suffering, sacrifice,

separation, and sacrament as inherent to God’s plan of salvation.

3) emphasizing the importance of Jesus and/or the Holy Spirit as our loving and gentle Teacher, and

developing a personal relationship with this Teacher.

Whatever I think is going on in the world is going on only in my mind. Many other aspects of myself,

those of me of different colour, race, economic status, location, creed, sex, build, etc. seem to agree with me –

well, its my dream, right? I can have it any way I choose, unless of course I am so unconscious that I am not

in control of my dreams. I notice, just for the