|
Table of Contents
Bank Fraud Exposed - Money out of YOUR Pocket!
Bank Fraud in Australia is Systemic -
part 2 -
part 3
The Foreign Currency Loan Experience in 1980s
Australia: Dwyer v Commonwealth Bank of Australia -
2
-
3
-
4
-
5
The Quade Appeal on Decision vs CBA
-
2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
Paul McLean is Back to Expose Bank Fraud
Bank Fraud in Australia Is a Step Toward
Controlling the Economy and the People
Bank Fraud in Australia Is Systemic and Affects
All Australians
Articles by Evan Jones
The NAB and Its Publicity Grabs
Innovation at the NAB and Grab
NAB accused of dirty tricks in Queensland
Bank Fraud and John Howard
Australian Four Pillars Bank Policy
Document Discovery and the Australian Courts

Final Warning: A History of the New World Order
When the Bankers became Con-men
Banks Behaving Badly
NABbed - an overcharging scandal involving the
biggest Australian bank
A Case Study in the
Adverse Small Business Environment in Australia
The Walter Family and
the National Australia Bank
-
part 2
The Victorian Courts
-
part 2
The Industry and the
Federal Authorities
The State of Victoria
and the Bracks Government
The NAB and the New
Public Relations Program
The Regulators, the Law
and Bank Malpractice
-
part 2
Conclusion and
References
Tony Rigg -Never in Default
1 -
NEVER IN DEFAULT - Rigg
2 -
Fraudulent Swiss Franc loans
3 -
Insider Trading within a Secret Society
4 -
Corrupt Receiver and Illegal Eviction
5 -
Collusion in Government
6 -
Commonwealth Bank Code of Practice
7 -
Pioneer in Steel Structure Building
8 -
Summary of Argument on Appeal from Federal Court
9 -
Brief for Joanna Gash, Federal MP from Gilmore
Steve Heinrich's Last Submission to Federal
Court
Wilfred Taylor
Corporate Australia
**********************
Patricia Poulos, Senior
Consultant and Head of Litigation
The plight of Tony Rigg and others is a disgrace.
What a blight on the Legal System and the government, when the likes
of successful businessman Tony Rigg has had to assume the role of his
own lawyer.
Try though they may, these wonderful Australians are no match for
those who act for the banks and other lending institutions and who,
without
conscience, sacrifice these innocents to the scrapheap.
It is imperative that the battle fought is on 'legal' grounds and the
result obtained is financially beneficial to the battlers.
I am saddened that so many, spend so much of their life, with very
little reward.
I have been where these fine people are, and now have a real
opportunity to assist. I now own an Incorporated Legal Practice -
"NICHOLAS POULOS LAWYERS" and we specialise in litigation (but have a
general practice).
With my knowledge and experience, no stone will be left unturned in
researching documents in order to uncover the truth and put it before
the
courts.
Kind regards,
Patricia Poulos
Establish a Family Foundation
to obtain the tax savings, transfer tax liability, create a lucrative
retirement income, and establish a legacy
...
here |
|
70. Despite Mr Quade 's single visit to head office in Sydney in October 1984,
the West Wyalong branch manager was the face of the bank to these appellants.
He was the person they trusted and looked to for direction and guidance.
People with the background, experiences and skills of the appellants
undoubtedly recognised the gap in knowledge and understanding of the relevant
subject matter between themselves and the bank. The fact that the bank
considered that an unhedged foreign currency loan was even feasible for them
would undoubtedly carry considerable weight. They would naturally put their
trust in its opinion on such a matter and the bank would undoubtedly be aware
of its influence on, and the vulnerabilities of, its clients in this area.
Their rural remoteness added to this reliance.
71. Although minds can differ as to precisely how far the evidence here goes
in that direction, and the precise legal definition of such a relationship may
need further thought, in my opinion it was plainly insufficient for the bank
to have invited these appellants not to 'hesitate to ask questions' or to have
told them that they could hedge the loan whenever they wanted to. A bank which
has undertaken the task of advising an intending borrower on such matters is
under a duty to provide a prior full, honest and clear explanation of the
nature and effect of the transaction being negotiated: Cornish v Midland Bank
(1985) 3 ALL ER 513 at 520 and 521; Perry v Midland Bank (1987) FLR 237. The
standard of care increases with the seriousness of the risk if the duty is
breached: Northwest Utilities Ltd v London Guarantee and Accident Co Ltd
(1936) AC 108 at 186; Swinton v The China Mutual Steam Navigation Co Ltd
(1951) 83 CLR 553 at 556 and 567. In a completely different context, Kirby P
dissenting in Ellis v Wallsend District Hospital (1989) 17 NSWLR 553 said,
with evident correctness:
The bigger the devastation of the possible risk, the
greater is the obligation to lay it before the
patient so that he or she can make an informed decision.
72. Statements made and not made are to be viewed in the total context of the
negotiations: Pappas v Soulac Pty Ltd (1983) 50 ALR 231; Elders Trustees and
Executors Co Ltd v E.G. Reeves Pty Ltd (1987) 78 ALR 193 at 242; Foti and Ors
v Banque Nationale de Paris (1990) Australian Torts Reports 81-025 (p
67,835), a decision of a Full Court of the South Australian Supreme Court. In
the total context of the present case, the extent of the risk being undertaken
by the appellants when contracting this loan can hardly be overemphasised.
73. In a lecture entitled "Developments in Foreign Currency Loan Litigation"
delivered to the Banking Law and Practice Conference in Melbourne on 24 May
1990, the respected Chief Judge of the Commercial Division of the Supreme
Court of New South Wales, Justice Andrew Rogers, drew a distinction between
the responsibilities of banks in transactions permeated by a risk element
where there is a fully informed client, and the conclusions which pertain when
"those who should be making the risk known to the customer and therefore
obtaining the customer's consent are insufficiently equipped to do so".
74. His Honour summarised the factual setting that had arisen in many cases
as follows:
1. The bank knew that such a borrowing was
pregnant with the danger of large capital loss
unless precautions were taken.
2. The bank knew that its staff was ill-equipped
to explain the risk to the borrower.
3. The bank knew that its staff was ill-equipped
to explain the nature of the available
precautions to be taken.
4. The bank was unwilling to accept the task of
management even at a fee, and thereby undertake
the task of implementing appropriate safety
precautions as and when required.
5. The customer was unaware of the extent of the
possible risk and of the available precautions
which could be taken and the techniques for
implementing such precautions.
6. The bank was aware of this lack of knowledge on
the part of the customer.
7. The customer relied on the fact that the bank
gave no warning of any of the foregoing
matters. By reason of the omission to warn of
the extent of the risk the customer relied on
the belief that any risk was limited or slight.
75. Virtually all of these factual criteria apply in this case. As if
speaking on some of the problems which existed at the time the appellants'
loan was being negotiated and in contemplation, Justice Rogers sought a
definition of the bank's duty to advise in the light of this common set of
circumstances that existed in many of these loans at the time:
First, the risk of depreciation of the Australian
dollar against the foreign currency in which the
liability of the borrower had to be repaid.
Second, the inability and, therefore, unwillingness
of the banks to manage customers' exposures to
foreign currency fluctuations. That meant that
customers were left to their own devices in meeting
the admitted risk.
Third, the bank's front-line staff up to and
including branch managers were substantially
innocent of any real knowledge of the difficulties
attaching to foreign currency borrowings. Whilst
charged by higher management with the task of
promoting such loans they were not equipped to
explain to borrowers either the risks attaching to
such loans, or the measures that were available and
required to contain the risk. Experience has shown
that even when bank managers called in "experts"
from regional offices the difficulties continued.
Higher management was advised that true expertise
was restricted to staff of the bank's International Branches.
76. I agree with respect with his Honour that these matters are all
distinctly relevant to the definition and delineation of the general duty of
care. In my view, the respondent having undertaken to advise the appellants,
what was required in this case was:
. for the appellants to be advised in plain language
of the magnitude of the risks and consequences they faced
. for the appellants to be informed what was needed to
protect them from the risks and to remove or
minimise the possible damage they might suffer,
including a detailed explanation of how total or
selective hedging works and how it may have such
effects on the cost of the money being borrowed as
to undermine the financial feasibility of the loan
in the first place
. for the bank to acquaint itself with all the
personal and financial circumstances of the
appellants relevant to their capacity to withstand
or meet currency losses
. for the bank to reveal its own commercial interest
in the loan and its lack of real knowledge and
experience in this area
. for the bank to make clear what type of professional
expertise was needed, at what times and intervals
and on what subjects, and where it could be obtained
. for the bank to advise the appellants that they were
not really geared or suitable for a foreign currency
loan, and should not contemplate it if they did not
have access to and were unwilling to take and
continue with the required outside advice
. for the bank to satisfy itself that this advice was
clearly understood before the loan was undertaken
77. The 'G' documents lend support to the bank's understanding of what was
required, and the consequences for unsophisticated borrowers if certain
fundamental precautions were not taken. In other words, the risk not being
explained and the means of its minimisation by stated precautions not having
been identified, the 'G' documents permit a finding, not open at the trial
because the documents were not available then, that the appellants were put in
the completely deceived and false position of being effectively required to
accept the risk of loss. They may be used to show that the bank embarked on
and undertook a presentation which was manifestly incomplete, with the
consequence for the appellants that they entered the loan agreement under
false sense of security or direction. If, as the respondent suggests here,
there was no call for further explanation, it may be found that the incomplete
information proffered may well have been worse than no information at all. In
the absence of full and complete information and advice of this kind, the
conclusion is manifestly open that what was imparted significantly failed to
fulfil the obligation to advise which the respondent had willingly undertaken
and volunteered to perform.
4. Trade Practices Act
78. As often occurs, there is considerable overlap between the question of
breach of section 52 and the question of negligence. Although, as I said
earlier, it was conceded that if the appellants fail on one, they will fail on
the other, it is useful to examine them separately. Was it misleading or
deceptive not to have undertaken the three objectives listed under the
previous heading of negligence?
79. Of course intent and knowledge are unnecessary: Parkdale Custom Built
Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd (1982) 149 CLR 191 per Gibbs C.J. at 197. But
with the 'G' documents accepted into evidence as they appear, this question
must be assessed in the context of the bank's policy to promote these loans,
their purpose for the bank of urgently improving its liquidity, its own lack
of the requisite knowledge and expertise, and the fact that it stood to make
considerable profits from their successful marketing. If the 'G' documents are
not successfully attacked or weakened, the bank's conduct will also fall to be
evaluated in the context of its patent and stark conflict of interest with the
appellants which was not even revealed let alone explained, and of the chasm
in knowledge between the bank and the appellants.
80. The appellants did not even prepare their own loan application form,
which was done by a bank officer. This and other facts found by Morling J.
establish the bank's knowledge that the appellants were placing their trust in
its advice on the possibility of taking out such a loan. It seems clear that
the bank knew that the appellants were unlikely to have ready access to
sources other than itself for expert advice. No doubt because a floating
currency was so new to Australia, few independent people outside the banks
appear to have been readily available in Australia at the time for private
consultation who even had the level of knowledge or access to the facts
possessed by the bank. If there were such people, they are unlikely to have
lived in West Wyalong or conducted a home visiting service to rural areas, and
the capital city yellow pages may not readily have provided their names and
telephone numbers. In relation to these appellants, who else besides the bank
would know who and where these people were? If from their own efforts the
appellants had found a person who claimed to be able to advise, how would they
know that he/she possessed the necessary skills? What effect would the fees
payable to such a person and the costs of carrying out their advice have on
their loan costs and outgoings, and therefore its feasibility? It is quite
understandable that the appellants would simply choose to trust their own
banker, especially this respondent with its statutory accountability to the
Australian people: see Commonwealth Banks Act 1959 esp.ss. 9(2), 11(2), 32 and
121, and what they may well have viewed as its special even historical role in
the nation.
81. In my opinion, the evidence at the trial, if supplemented by the
unsullied or unqualified 'G' documents, manifests a clear case of misleading
and deceptive conduct inducing the appellants to accept and enter the loan. It
does not seem to be disputed that their subsequent losses flowed from what
would then be a contravention of section 52.
Did Morling J. ask the right question?
82. His Honour found that the appellants were aware of the risks and that
there was accordingly no breach by the respondent of section 52 or of the
common law duty of care. However, his Honour did not specifically find that
the appellants were informed of the true nature and extent of the risks and
then advised to manage the risk continuously with the benefit of qualified
expert outside assistance to ensure the best possible decisions throughout the
loan. This is where, with very great respect, I believe the trial was caused
to miscarry by the absence of the 'G' documents. They constitute these as the
true matters in issue and the questions to be addressed and answered. In my
view, there is only one answer provided for them by the evidence on appeal. It
is that if the 'G' documents are accepted as they appear on their face to be,
the respondent, having entered upon the task of giving advice to these
appellants, failed to ensure that the advice it gave was comprehensive,
adequate and accurate in the respects I have earlier outlined.
Conclusion
83. I have read with care the views of Burchett J, and although in my view
there are grounds for concluding that the 'G' documents justify a finding that
the respondent's liability has been established, I have, like his Honour,
decided that a new trial is the appropriate result.
84. In view of the conclusions reached on the other heads of claim, it is not
necessary to pass on any special effects wrought on these facts by the
Contracts Review Act 1980 (NSW). I agree with the orders proposed by Burchett
J. including those his Honour suggests as appropriate on the question of
costs.

History of Banking Fraud:
The Coming Battle
By M. W. WALBERT
The
Coming Battle documents from Congressional records, newspaper reports
and writings by the founding fathers and others a chronology of events
long forgotten that shaped our fledgling nation from 1776 to 1899. Read
about the manipulation of our money and its supply, the intentional
creation of recessions, depressions and panics, manipulation of the stock
markets, and the demonetization of silver.
Secrets of the Federal Reserve
by Eustace Mullins
Eustace Mullins' carefully
researched and documented treatise picks up from Walbert's expose' and
brings it to the mid 1980's
Taking Back Your Power
by Allen Aslan Heart
WHAT CAN YOU DO? Stop playing THEIR game. Take back
your power. Stop paying taxes that are not legal or lawful. Stop paying
bills you don't really owe. Stop using THEIR money. There ARE ways if you
open your mind and look for the gaps in their fences that keep the sheeple
in their pasture. Are you chattel or a real person? You are the one who
makes that choice.
Our experienced
debt elimination
service professionals have been helping people with
debt elimination,
tax freedom,
and
credit
repair for over ten years. To contact them
click here.
Real Debt Elimination information is
for the purpose of education and broadening horizons ONLY.
Your Credit File Rights
For debt elimination
to be successful you must know your rights.
Zombie Debt:
Debt is Hard to Kill
There's a hot new growth industry: companies that buy
ancient bad debts for pennies and squeeze you to pay. Here's debt
elimination ideas how to
get them off your back.
Sleazy
New Debt Collector Tactics
It may not be your debt, but it
could be your problem. Collection agencies are bullying blameless
consumers into paying debts they never owed. Eliminate your debt and
be free.
Debt Collection Practices: When
Hardball Tactics Go Too Far
Dealing with a debt collector can
be one of life's most stressful experiences. Harassing calls, threats,
and use of obscene language can drive you to the edge. Debt
elimination is the solution.
An
Outcry Rises as Debt Collectors Play Rough
The rise in American consumer debt
has been accompanied by a sharp increase in complaints about
aggressive and sometimes unscrupulous tactics by debt collection
agencies, a phenomenon that has government regulators increasingly
concerned. Debt elimination removes any advantage they claim.
Debt Collection Puts on a
Suit
As consumer loans hit an all-time
high, the industry gets more sophisticated. That means that debt
elimination skills must are even more important.
© 2007,
Allen
Aslan Heart / White Eagle Soaring of the
Little Shell Pembina Band,
a
Treaty
Tribe of the Ojibwe Nation.
|